>>18124464
>Was pride always a flaw?
That's largely a matter of translation.
Historically many cultures saw attributes that could reasonably be translated as pride (or at least an aspect of it) as something extremely positive, but it all depends on how you define the basic concept of pride.
Like take Aristotles, he considered megalopsuchia as the crown of virtues, and it's not uncommon to translate the term with pride, but also with magnanimity, so you see that it's an issue of terminology as much as it is an issue of viewpoints.

>>18124464
It seems that nowadays "pride" only exists in its worst form. Only lgbt "pride" is considered something positive lmao.