Based Churchill
>>18125443He was a Soviet agent. Based!
>>18125443>Germany has just finished breaking every single arms limitation and non aggression treatyDid the person who made this image remember about Chamberlain's speech saying Hitler violated nothing?
>>18125458all the more reason to like him
>>18125474He then proceeded to hold a speech where he accused Hitler of breaking the Munich agreement so no.
>>18125580That treaty only gave a vague promise of guarantees to the Czechoslovak state. That state then proceeded to fall apart, making those guarantees void.
>>18125597Doesn't change the fact that Chamberlain held a speech where he said that Hitler broke the Munich agreement, which is what I was responding to.Your personal interpretations are irrelevant to the fact that Chamberlain held the speech and that the speech exist.
Insulting hitler is very considered very offensive by members of the latinx communityIn the future, be more considerate, be an ally, and DO BETTER, op
>>18125443Churchill is in Hell alongside Hitler for denying Christ's divinity
>>18125606But Chamberlain also had a speech saying Hitler did nothing wrong, furthermore, Chamberlain's speeches are irrelevant, Hitler never violated any treaty.
Churchill cut our armed forces when he was Chancellor. He was a big part of the reason we were so unprepared for war. Paying American creditors was more important than defending ourselves. Him being half American is just a coincidence of course
>>18125797Which speech was the most recent anon?Also, you seem to have problems with logic. YOUR interpretation of his speech is irrelevant.What is relevant is that Chamberlain believed Hitler had violated the treaty, and he declared to the parlament his belief that Hitler had violated the treaty, which the parlament accepted, otherwise it would have been their first comment to his speech.The point here is that Chamberlain the speech where Chamberlain said that Hitler had violated the treaty does exist and it's the most recent speech of the two, so the fact that he said this makes your >>18125580 post null and void because it contradicts the entire point of your post which was that Chamberlain said that hitler DID NOT violate the treaty. Do you understand this plain and simple logic of reasoning towards the argument that your post made?I honestly don't think I can explain it any clearer so if you still don't understand then you're suffering from terminal brain damage.
>>18125965>makes your>>18125580post null and voidWrong quoted post.Meant >>18125474
>>18125965>Chamberlain believedso what? He was clearly experiencing some kind of cognitive dissonance.>your postThat wasnt me.You are unable to understand Chamberlain is unreliabe.
>>18125993Ok well whoever made the >>18125474 post is clearly wrong and that was my entire argument when i highlighted the more recent speech that said the complete opposite of what the anons posted.Now kindly fuck off.
>hey britain we are gonna drive to the east>no.>okay then we are gonna fuck france and then we are gonna drive to the east>no.>your call but your empire can't survive another war. remember what happened with ireland?>no.>*ends up massively in debt to its own colonies and becoming historically irrelevant forever*
>>18126642The allies were confident in victory because Germany was still relatively weak in 1939. France absolutely mogged Germany in heavy armaments, and both Britain and France were beginning to outproduce Germany in aircrafts.Germany had no answer to the blockade which would only further tip the scale as allies mobilize 1/3 of the world under their respective empire. French airfields were just a few minutes away from the industrial Ruhr heartland. The maginot line was considered unbreakable.On paper, Germany stood no chance given enough time, she had to go on the offensive as soon as possible, and Case Yellow was a one-in-a-million shot of succeeding.So yeah, it makes sense that Britain nor France never believed it would be a war of +40 million dead over the course of 6 years, but then again, neither did the Germans.
>>18126794They weren't confident in any such thing, which is why their strategy was a super cucked defensive "Sitzkrieg". They were waiting for Germany to attack France and hoping to bog them down into a meatgrinder. And even that failed miserably. Britain had no real strategy for winning the war after the fall of France.
>>18126794No one thought the Nazis were batshit enough to start another war. Annexing all of Czechoslovakia in violation of their agreement on the matter was pushing it, but the appeasers still gave Adolf a pass. It wasn’t like he hadn’t been told that France and Britain would consider an invasion of Poland an act of war.
>>18126642>let us murder 70% of europeans, at least you get your beloved indians and nigerians with you!
>>18126797Sitting and waiting made the most sense because they need to mobilize their respective empire and they were still rearming. Like I said by 1940 they were already beginning to outoroduce Germany. Another year if sitting and the advantage would be overwhelming. Plus the naval blockade already put German industry in a critical position because the allies were going to block off iron ore.Germany had to make a move while they were still somewhat equal.The allies wanted to win with as less casualties as possible. Thst means starving and bombing Germany since Germany can't keep up in the long run. If the Germans try to end the war the allies would brace behind strong French fortifications that would bleed the attacker more than the defender.You literally don't even have the most basic knowledge on ww2. Never post again retard.
>>18125612Is it worse than offending spainjeet empire
>>18125618Roosevelt and Stalin are in hell as well.So is Mao
>>18127601They didnt annex Czechoslovakia and they never violated Munich.Why do you make things up?>appeaserswho?Chamberlain was extremely antagonistic towards Hitler, who tf is he to threaten Germany over a German-Czech dispute?Is it Germany's place to oversee British-Irish relations?The Nazis didnt start "another war".
>>18127945but the advantage wasnt overwhelming and Britain played a relatively minor role compared to the US and USSR and had to be carried hard by the US and the Commonwealth, the US especially.
>>18129382The advantages were overwhelming on paper, and if Britain and France had been allowed to fully mobilize their empires & armed forces.No one expected Case Yellow to succeed, not even the German command. Hitler had to veto the decision and even Hitler was on the edge about it.Even Norway was a massive gamble that shouldnt have been successful yet was.These two miracle-offensives however made Hitler and the wehrmacht overconfident and it contributed to the worst mistakes made later in the war.
>>18129377Give it a rest.
>>18129454I am not wrong, your refusal to admit the facts changes nothing.You have, for over a year, been completely unable to actually demonstrate any violation of Munich.Furthermore you continue to pretend Czechoslovakia was annexed when annexation is a formal term with a specific meaning in geopolitics, that of a formal recognized land transfer.No such formal recognition by Germany or the Czech state took place after Munich.You continue to lie about this for some reason.
>>18129516Why dont you write a book if you're so sure you're not wrong then.Better than chronically spam 4chan.
>>18129542Why dont you accept the facts instead of lying about them chronically on 4trans?
>>18129547Because you're not correct. You only win by sheer persistant autism.Again, write a book if you're so convinced because that will require you to actually argue your positon from intellectual academic logic and facts against other historians rather than autistically shitpost about how right you are against people who generally dont give a shit what you think.
>>18129377>they never violated Munich.why are you lying
>>18129542'cuz there are probably plenty of them already out therearchive.org link https://dn790009.ca.archive.org/0/items/WhatTheWorldRejectedHitlersPeaceOffers1933-1939/WhatTheWorldRejectedHitlersPeaceOffers1933-1939ByDr.FriedrichStieve.pdf
>>18129659That text was written by Hitlers government in 1940 lol
>>18129671Read the Complete Works of David Irving
>>18129865Can you shut the fuck up?I never asked for book advice you dumb Hitler cocksucking retard.People with insufferable autism should be executed. Especially if they're transatlantic NA mestizo mutts who are chronically online to larp as german ethno fascist.Kill yourself.
>>18129904Huh?
>>18128001Mao reincarnated into a fly
