>ends monarchies across the globe
>>18126216The future is monarcho-communism, communism being imposed from above by an absolute monarch. This is the necessary dialectical synthesis of the antinomy of absolute authority and absolute equality. It's going to be based.
>>18126291Incoherent
>>18126310Wrong :)
>>18126216COMMUNISM IS THE WORST
>>18126291We already had that with Stalin and Mao. Didn't work out so well.Politics is the balance between three forces: Monarchy, Nobility and Democracy. It has to correlate to the productive forces, otherwise it will be impotent.There is no doubt that Stalinism and Maoism correspond to the "enlightened despots" of the 18th and 19th century, the Labour Aristocracy (quite literal in most cases) the union leaders, bureaucrats, intelligentsia, and technocrats and Democracy the wage workers. The period of enlightened despotism, or Stalinism, did prove the economic foundations of socialism sound, maintaining high productivity, but proved completely reactionary politically,
>>18126325>but proved completely reactionary politicallyAnd that's a good thing!
>>18126371No. Why the hell would anyone support arbitrary rule when it doesn't bring a benefit? The secret of all oppressive power is that it claims its necessary to keep things running, if it doesn't keep things running or progressing anymore, then then that justification erodes. Stalin might've been able to boast to a nation of shit eating peasants he brought to them electrification, it would be much harder to convince a nation of wage workers, a scientific, practical and battle hardened class, that abdicating their own power to one man rule is beneficial.
Punch a commie.
>>18126291They often say this of Korea that it is a “communist monarchy” but Kim Jong Un isn’t even the actual acting premiere. His title of Supreme Leader is largely symbolic. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pak_Thae-song>when you find out Korea actually has a premiere and that they vote for him in elections as a country
>>18126291North Korea is a Communist Dynasty that is passed father to son. It's far from utopia.
>>18126426Monarchy isn't hereditary rule.
>>18126426See >>18126421literally the post right above youKim Jong Un isn’t acting Premiere.
>>18126426>>The supreme leader (Korean: 최고령도자; MR: Ch'oego Ryŏngdoja) is the de facto hereditary leader of the Workers' Party of Korea, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) and the Korean People's Army. The title is honorary, given only after death in the first two cases. >>>the title is honoraryKim Jong Un isn’t actually the head of the workers party of Korea and his job title is pretty much to look pretty and represent socialism to the world. Park Thae song is the Korean equivalent of President who handles the heavy desk work.
>>18126426Communism isn't a utopia. Not to say North Korea is even Communist, but the very idea of Communism is anti-utopian. Karl Marx wrote a tract against this.
>>18126460>very idea of Communism is anti-utopianTrue. The mere concept is terrible beyond belief.
>>18126310He's kind of right. It's the ideal Caesar the dumb masses are yearning for
>>18126421>>18126437Other than the Tsar which monarchical head actually had the final say in most cases?By this logic the UK isnt a monarchy because Charles has no real power at all
>>18126216Ends monarchies in>Russia>Bulgaria>Hungary>Mongolia>EthiopiaAnd that's pretty much it, far from the whole world
>>18127164>By this logic the UK isnt a monarchy because Charles has no real power at allYes
>>18126216Replaced them with non-hereditary monarchies you mean. And non-electable too obviously - just the most primitive mafia-style organizations kek.
>>18126216I don't even know who was the British King during WW2 (was it some George?); but everybody knows that the Soviet Union was Stalin's ranch kek.
>>18126216There are several monarchies that still exist. And no, not like Japan or the British, there are still true absolute monarchies out there so you are wrong.
>>18127503You can't get closer to absolute monarchy than what's Cuba and Best Korea has kek.
