Is it just me or were most of the works in the NSDAP Degenerate Art Exhibitionactually pretty good?
>>18130136
Its just you
>>18130142Explain how those pieces are bad.
>>18130136Hitler flunked art school, I wouldn't trust his opinions on art to be honest. In fact his taste seems to be awfully generic Romanticist and NeoClassical slop, which was just the 19th/20th century equivalent of Marvel movies, completely unchallenging and for the masses. Hitler was also a huge fan of Disney cartoons so it doesn't surprise me that his taste in art would be so pedestrian.
>>18130142failed out of art school, huh?
>>18130146They look bad and lack skill. Ive made drawings from when I was a child that were more compelling.
>>18130152>they look badHow?
>>18130148Explain why art needs to be 'challenging' and why this most often manifests as 'blobs of meaningless color'
>>18130155Because it's boring. Romanticism is great when you're a small child but you should have major Romanticist fatigue as an adult, there's only so much you can do with overly idyllic landscape #1958298.
>>18130141https://youtu.be/PHhMeLHEs5c?si=kQpu3fLwr4rZPhkh
>>18130160Ah yes, art for adults. Picrel. I could sell you my cum if i told you its for adults. Hey kid, wanna buy this pound of broc- i mean weed? Only 300 bucks, thats a great deal for an oz lmao
The aesthetics of Nazism are enough to discount it for me. Totalitarianism is always so devoid of soul or passion
>>18130166>mfw i have no picrel
>>18130170Complete strawman, there are more types of artwork out there than romanticist slop and Suprematism.
>>18130175This is your home
Weird how the country with supposedly "good" art lost WW2
>>18130192>the piece of art designed specifically to enrage basic bitches is still doing its job 100 years laterContender for the most successful piece of art ever, surely?
>>18130192Readymade art is basically just realism taken to a purist extreme. It's something that really only exists as a result of the industrial revolution since the point is to step back the trivialization of manufactured pieces. It's meant to say "If you really stopped and thought about it, bicycle wheels are pretty cool" which is one of those things that I also think has a novelty that wears off pretty quickly, which is why I think it died so quickly. Found Objects are similar but they can be for more than just manufactured items, which I think is somewhat more interesting since the objects have more of a story behind them
>>18130136I can appreciate their aesthetics while also acknowledging that outright hatred for humanity of those artistic schools and their masters. I would especially be sore about them if I could in any way draw a correlation between the themes in their art and the pillaging of my country. Was it perfectly rational in an aesthetic sense to call them bad? No. Is it understandable why the NSDAP hated them? Yes.
>>18130169Mussolini and Lenin presided over extraordinary art and Hitler sponsored one of the 20th century's most important filmmakers at least. Totalitarianism increases variance at least as much as it reduces quality
>>18130211>art became abstract following the invention of cheap photography>this means artists hate humanityTouch grass you fucking wierdo.
>>18130216>there's like, a plane, and it's like flying. In clouds. And it lands people are like there, cheeringWow, how innovative!
>>18130216>one of the 20th century's most important filmmakersRiefenstahl? LMAO
>>18130217I mean read into the thoughts that a lot of these artists had on humanity and the natural world. They actively detested it and this is never mentioned because getting bogged down in aesthetic critiques of modernist art during Weimar Germany is much easier to do.
>>18130228I mean she was incredibly important to the art of film making regardless of how you feel about her political leanings.
>>18130217The sole point of abstract art is to make a mockery of humanity. If the photograph renders art meaningless then we should abolish art altogether. I'd rather destroy all beauty than allow it to be perverted and ridiculed endlessly
>>18130260>I'd rather destroy all beautyOf course you would, schizo
>>18130136Tribal negro art is unironically better. Why don't we all just become negroes?
>>18130260How is it a mockery?
Do people who hate modern art and think everything should be realistic+representational think this is bad?
>>18130269It satirizes the human form and natural world in a very dark and sardonic way. It expresses negative emotions very well but it kinda overdoses on despair and the only respite you get from that is in a weird and frantic euphoria.
>>18130280What the fuck abstract art are you looking at?
>>18130266Negroes invented surrealist art before whiteoids did, AND they're better at it! Another victory for the Black Man
>>18130272Abstracting is fine, it just can't get too grim all the time.
>>18130281This kind
>>18130281Eh I mean I go to my local museum often, really good abstract modern/post-modern art usually plays to dread or lost innocence or other unpleasant themes. It's not bad in isolation but when it comprises most of what makes art nowadays it can get a bit tiring. If I were to think of an example of the respite I mentioned probably something along the lines of Yayoi Kusama. I contrast this heavily with the time I spent in Europe looking at the works of the Renaissance and Baroque masters in all mediums. They definitely feel different.
>>18130282Honestly I'd rather look at African art than whatever garbage is currently being touted by contemporary art critics. It's pretty much the same thing but less condescending and pseudo-intellectual
>>18130148>In fact his taste seems to be awfully generic Romanticist and NeoClassical slop, which was just the 19th/20th century equivalent of Marvel movies, completely unchallenging and for the masses.I mean look at the movies produced in the Third Reich. A lot of light-hearted romantic comedies and musicals and stuff like that. Leni Riefenstahl was famous but they didn't actually make very many political movies.>>18130192>This is your homeWhat's wrong with Dadaismhttps://youtu.be/PTFwQP86BRs
>>18130169>The aesthetics of Nazism are enough to discount it for me. Totalitarianism is always so devoid of soul or passionThe forms vary but what totalitarian systems have in common is that art has to be clear (unambiguous), uplifting, and directed in a way that it's like a teacher telling you what to think, how to behave, what to look like, and so on. It's usually really melodramatic and kitschy. Here's some High Stalinism:https://youtu.be/UE-jGjCEzH4
>>18130136It definitely makes useful kindling
>zis is DEGENERATE ARCHITECTURE oder etwas>REEEEEEEEEEE
>>18130362Classical style is better. Sorry faggot
>>18130136The statue is pretty cool
Nazi views on art never made much sense doctrinely. For instance they banned the sculpture of pic related, a man who based his style off traditional north German peasant art, and instead favoured discounted and shoddy derivatives of Greco-Roman styles.
>>18130136Yes, this art is so "good" it hangs on the walls of every Target and Wal-Mart on Earth.......Very Proletariat! SAD!
>>18130136Abstract Expression is the Be-Bop of the art world. Decent talent wasted on pure pretense and low effort. Invariably, in both instances the response to the complete and utter lack of emotional response to their "art", or outright revulsion, is simply to say that the viewer "just doesn't get it, bro", or it's "too complicated", or "you're not supposed to like it", or "then don't look at it", or "I don't care what you think. It's not for you.", "muh Identity"......nothing but excuses for bad work, which they know they can't defend either. If there was any value to this "art", it would have endured, but it does not, so it did not. /thread
>>18130175See, here's the "you just don't get it, bro" cut I was talking about. Yes, there are many kinds of art in the world......and this is shit art ;) You just don't get it.
I despise having to pretend Hitler’s art is anything but uninspired mediocrity just because I otherwise admire the man.
Because, "art" is more about "let's make this look as realistic as possible". If we were to go the route of "lets make this look as realistic as possible", then that was perfected already in the 1700s.However, if you recall, there was an important invention around the late 1800s called photography. This made the whole "let's make a realistic painting" kind of useless. Just take a picture of something. Then in the late 1800s/early 1900s, art became "let's make stuff that cameras cannot", and thus you see impressionism, abstraction, pointillism, futurism, etc etc.
>>18130136>weimar
>>18130136>>18130141These are not good
>>18130282Lol, based negro poster
>>18132107kill yourself nigger
>>18133319Racism is not allowed here! MODS
>>18130160>overly idyllic landscapeThe landscapes in European painting are literally what most of Europe actually looks like. It's not "overly idyllic" unless you're only familiar with ugly urban sprawl and pollution.
>>18130200>designed
>>18130810The point being he had much shitier contemporaries who, nonetheless, became "darlings of the Academy" despite playing the """anti-establishment""" card whilst becoming world famous millionaires, of course. The original DEI policy where "ugly is beautiful", blah, blah, blah....It's all so tiresome. "Help! Help! I'm being repressed!"
