[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: hans-frank.jpg (221 KB, 1200x1662)
221 KB
221 KB JPG
>Gon' get hanged next week, so fuck it
>Ummmm...Literal Hitler was a jew
>>
>>18130690
>dude christianity lmao
He really thought this would work?
>>
Just one of many instances of people breaking down and giving insane confessions in the face of death.

>Hans Frank: I investigated Hitler's Jewish ancestry and found that he was part-Jewish!

>Franz Ziereis: I was involved in the gassing of 1,500,000 sick prisoners at Hartheim, even though Mauthausen had its own gas chamber!

>Rudolf Höss: I murdered 2,500,000 out of a total of 1,300,000 inmates at Auschwitz!

Holocaust deniers should be studying these confessions for material, not writing nonsense about swimming pools (which were there for firefighting and used as ersatz pools by camp guards) and brothels (which existed as a reward for collaborative inmates). A lot of the Holocaust's historical and legal evidence hinges on verbal and written confessions by Nazi officers and camp commanders, but these confessions don't match the state of the art of mainstream Holocaust research at all. Typically, if a death toll is mentioned, it's at least 2x the amount of deaths currently estimated by Holocaust historians.

Actually, I'd love to see someone accuse a mainstream historian - say, Van Pelt - of Holocaust denial for denying that 2,500,000 people were killed at Auschwitz between 1941 and 1943. After all, that is what Höss claimed initially, not 1,100,000 between 1941 and 1945, which is the current consensus among historians.

>>18130705
He should have read the room better if he wanted to act the part of a reformed Nazi who had come to God. He wasn't talking to an audience that valued Christianity, especially not Catholicism. None of the primary judges were Catholics. One of the judges was a trade union man from England, another was a state atheist from the Soviet Union, a third was a WASP from America, and even the French judge was a Protestant. The reason Speer was able to save himself is that he presented himself not as a good Christian, but as a prim and proper upper middle class professional whose moral turn could serve as an example to others of his class.
>>
>>18130690
>be Albert Speer
>express remorse at Nuremberg
>be handsome
>die of natural causes in your mansion in the 80s after being released and having a best selling memoir

>be Hans Frank
>express remorse at Nuremburg
>be ugly
>get executed in disgrace in 1946
>>
>>18130736
Van Pelt report is a rip off from Pressac and is exposed by Mattogno. .

Van pelt doesn’t take questions.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.