how could the Crusades, something considered sacred, religious, holy, end in defeat?
>>18133474There was nothing "holy" about them, even as early as the First Crusade they killed Christians in the Levant.
>>18133474>>18133479Also, something is not holy because people consider it to be so, God has to be the one to choose you and make you holy. God is not bound by what people consider sacred.
>>18133474lack of support from "fellow" christians
>>18133479we know, but they were considered holy, sacred and religious back then, or at least they were marketed as such
>>18133484>we know, but they were considered holy, sacred and religious back thenSee:>>18133481
>>18133481so God wanted Islam to win ?
>>18133492I do not presume to know what God thought of the Crusaders, and neither should you.If God wanted them to triumph, they would have. The Muslims could have won due to God's favor, or due to their own merit, without divine sanction.
>>18133496>do not presume to know what God thought of the Crusaders, and neither should you.why? What's wrong with that
>>18133508>why?Because you do not know the mind of God.
>>18133511idk last 1400 years seems like he favorize Islam a bit
>>18133474The point was to kill as many Tartars as possible, which they were partially successful.
>>18133516The world has been under the spell of Lucifer that's why.
>>18133546where is God then
>>18133549>has never studied eschatology
>>18133474Because popery and crusaderism are wicked
