Why aren't reproductive rights guaranteed to men?
>>18133600They shouldn't be. If you can't get a single woman to agree to be impregnated by you, that's a sign from nature/God your genes are meant to die out. Letting the utterly dysgenic procreate regardless just so they feel better would be an absolute disaster for our species in the long-term.
>>18133614Normie sadism
>>18133600Arranging marriages has historically been common in many cultures and religious traditions. It remains widespread in certain regions, particularly South Asia, West Asia and North Africa, Central Asia, Southeast Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. In other parts of the world, such as Europe and East Asia, the practice has declined substantially since the 19th century.
>>18133614Why does rape petrify you?
>>18133624The population is dysgenic enough without the most unfuckable of the unfuckable being permitted to breed thanks to state intervention.
>>18133625Just let people enjoy things
>>18133614Not that I disagree with you, but the 'God' part is funny
>>18133600male pill feminism kill
>>18133600Because retards and failures shouldn't propagate their corrupted genes.>>18133614This. It's so incredibly easy to reproduce. Even the most retarded shitskinned subhumans can do it. If you can't even fuck then what the fuck is your problem?
>>18133614>>18134312>women are good judges of genetic qualityare they? prove it.
>>18133625actually the most unfuckable of the unfuckable are the ones reproducing with each other and its the higher quality more beautiful more intelligent people who are dying out.You didnt know this?income and high social status are NEGATIVE corollaries with fertility.Shouldnt we, being an enlightened society, work to countermand this?
>>18133614fpbp>>18134341>reeeee womenneither of them said
>>18133614>>18133625>>18134312>>18134350Yawn
Women literally choose to mate with short fat mentally ill retards.Basically the opposite of what both incels and normie-sadist eugenicists preach is true
>>18134350>women are the gatekeepers of reproduction>also reproduction has nothing to do with womenso which is it?If women get to judge men, well are they good judges?
>>18134417By that logic I should be having sex. Well besides the retard part. I am a huge reader of natural and social science theory books as well as history.
>>18133600Umm its not a right sweaty, we are not communists here. Though I guess the closest thing to an answer is that feminism gained popularity at the same time socialism did, which then abolished all the calls for free love in favour of female agency.Free love and redistributed means of reproduction were all the rage in Utopian, anarchist, even some scientific socialist circles. Bolsheviks had a brief sexual libertinism phase, for example.>>18134417Thuletide was a mistake.
>>18133614>>18134312>>18134341Anyone see that chart of Mozart's descendants the other day? Spooky shit. Even successful people married to nobles have a significant chance of dying out within a few generations for no real reason. They just gave up the fight or something
>>18135786
>>18136083all those incels and spinsters. breeding is for the genetic elite >yuo mean like mozart?I guess not
>>18136083but then, perhaps this wasn't Mozart's fault, his two sons lived to age. It was the nation that died and regrew chaotically. Maybe what robbed him and made him a peasant was the fact that he lived in deepest darkest Europe while the modern age turned wheels to grind that wilderness away. If he were an Englishman this would've never happened, though his powerful jungle rhythms and eerie spirituality would likely not happen either.
>>18134367underrated gemBelieving that women's sexual selection is somehow le good because evolution said so, is not only retarded because it is an example of appeal to nature fallacy, but also because by the same logic morbidly obsese amerimutts are in the right because our brains are programmed to love sugar
