[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why were the only two succesful colonies in the americas ones in which the natives were all killed and replaced by whites and there was also no mixing with blacks?
>>
>>18133653
Because the Spanish and Portuguese did not take their families with them from Europe
>>
>>18133653
Because cohesive, homogeneous communities tend to be the most successful.

It's just a default human norm. You don't have to be an edgelord about it to recognise this.
>>
>>18133668
>e cohesive, homogeneous communities
I don't think this true even in nature
>>
>>18133653
Because they were actual whites (anglos) instead of moor rapebaby iberberians, however being anglo comes with being a nigger and kike worshipper
>>
File: 1762281600467.jpg (80 KB, 597x374)
80 KB
80 KB JPG
>>18133653
It's because American colonists developed their own philosophy. On the other hand, the philosophy of the spanish and portuguese was some feudal mindcontrol stuff like "suffer your whole life to make some random noble rich and go to heaven, bro. If you question these things, you get the Inquisition special".
>>
>>18134080
What the fuck are you talking about?

Alike kinds group together. This is literally how everything in nature functions.
>>
>>18133668
>Because cohesive, homogeneous communities
Lol
>tend to be the most successful.
Lmao. Fucking dropout
>>
>>18135447
>Alike kinds group together
Not exaclty. They have a lot of competition. On topbof that humans have been migrating and mixing for ages so many group you say are "alike" have actually pretty diverse lineages and histories.
>>
>>18133653
>natives were all killed
>there was also no mixing with blacks?
Both false
>>
File: cherokee.jpg (5 KB, 195x258)
5 KB
5 KB JPG
>>killed all natives
>>no mixing with blacks
What the fuck are you saying? The united states didn't killed all the natives, they literally created an exclusive land for them.
African americans have between 30-20% white ancestry, and the native american tribes also mixed with the white americans of the XVII-XIX century, specially the "civilized tribes" (cherokee, chocktaw, creeks, chikasaw, seminole).
But because Reddit memes sold the false idea that
>>spaniards were the hyperfuckingbasado and didn't do anything, but the anglosaxons were le bad and didn't mixed with blacks and natives
then everybody believes it.
Pic rel is an example of a cherokee mixed person, Joseph Vann.
>>
>>18135447
see
>>18135499
Also basically the idea of natural selection/evolution means that populations that are MORe competitive and hetrogenous are more successful overall because all the tumult selects for the most adaptive traits. its counterintuitive and goes against our sense of community and racial purity and its sort of disgusting but i think its true. thats nature for you, the bloodsucking leech survives but the chad dies in real nature
>>
Anglo vs spanish colonizations didnt even happen in the same century so they hardly can be compared.

Also just look at geography to answer your question. The 13th colonies literally could trade with each other by sea, internal colonization was aided by inland rivers

Meanwhile mexican cities are surrounded by big mountanous terrains and south america is too far away from connercial routes
>>
Every where catholic is a corrupt shithole name one catholic country that isn’t corrupt, broke or borderline failed state
>>
>>18135660
>>18135499
That's true to a degree, but only a degree. Heterogeneity has benefits to a point, but its not infinite. You only have your cousins and second cousins to fuck? yah probably not good. a gene pool of a million? that's all the heterogeneity you need. Adding in more randos who can breed doesnt necessarily make the whole a lot better.
>>
>>18135916
Actually second cousin marriages are like 99% fine, even first cousin marriages are like 95% fine, im pulling those numbers out of my ass but i remember reading something along those lines.
the point I'm trying to make is that nature unconsciously selects for heterogeneity because homogeneous populations get completely wiped out when a threat is introduced. when there are 10 different humans and 1 gets killed from disease and the other 9 survive, evolution considers this a success, even if that 1 was a 6'6 blue eye blond nordic aryan gigachad and the 9 were various short browns, or something along those lines.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.