https://openpsych.net/files/papers/Parra_2025a.pdfWhite British = 100. DiscussAlso, why does Greece score so low?>Greece: 92.57Is it likely the Ancient Greeks also averaged similarity in genetic potential for intelligence?
>>18170408Skimmed through the numbers. Seem pretty accurate. Lines up with the results of non-racist academics too.
>>18170434>non-racist academicsDo you mean non-pro-White academics (which are the vaaast majority of people in university today) or academics that are certified not to be racially biased in any direction whatsoever (which could be a little rarer) ?
>>18170564I mean people who don't have RationalWiki page
What makes Belarusians and Slovaks dumber than Russians and Poles?
Estland Übermenschenhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adaGDCDbhb8
>>18170564This just proves Pol Pot kind of had a point.
>>18170408>>18170408>Saaaar new IQ study saar>Just a rehash of Richard Lynn's already debunked statisticsEurocucks are shameless. Capitalizing white wont give you an ethnostate BTW
>>18170587Nice ad hominem faggot. Do you filter all your studies this way?
>>18170408its culture and environment.
>>18170637Slovakia has a lot of gypsies (about 10%) Not sure about Belarus. It did better in other studies though
>>18170651Every global intelligence study will be a rehash of Lynn's numbers anon because Lynn was correct.But you're not ready for that conversation.
>>18170408>why does Greece score so low?Too much darkness has contaminated those lands for they to fully express the glory of the light.
>>18170651Assraged poopy person.
>>18170655Any reasonable person does
>>18170408Is this also based on Becker and Lynn? Or a new study where they actually have samples/tests from all of these countries
>>18170845Mankind quarterly did the standard matrix testing for Russians in Siberia and Yakuts and got 85 and 80 against the English average of 100. Lynn's stuff probably exaggarates Slav stats.
>>18170651>capitalising the first letter of a new line is racially chargedinterdasting
>>18170408Ancient Greece was probably the most urbanized society in antiquityUrban life is the seed of development and greatness. It has its cons but this is undeniable
>>18170730>all rational people engage in logical fallacies
>>18170699
>>18170408>Israel - 93.88>Iran - 83.71Huh, I thought they were stereotypically smarter.The sharp contrast between N. Korea and S. Korea also shows how important environmental factors are to IQ.
>>18171215How did they administer iq examinations in North Korea?
Shouldn't the gap have gotten bigger with the flyn effect?
>>1817040892 isn't that low lol. People don't understand these numbers.
>>18170564Paranoia does not look good on you
>>18170408>Qatar higher than IranGulf Arabs have more black admixture and were historically known for being retarded compared to Persians so I'm skeptical of these numbers.
>>18171534>>18170587I mean that anon appears to be correct as the first poster revealed himself immediately in his response.
>>18171576>anon appears to be correctNot at all
>>18171562>so I'm skeptical of these numbers.Did you actually look at the data sources for each? You cant just say "X has Y admixture" and handwave shit away like that.
>>18170637Probably a combination of Brain Drain (Ukraine lost an entire fourth of it's population after the Soviet Union fell) and the fact that it's currently a bombed out hellhole that has lost a fourth of its population again. Basically anyone who had any kind of education got the fuck out of dodge leaving only the dregs behind.
>>18171576Claiming modern academics are pro-white isn't even a take, it's a Marxist lie. And at this point, really more of a "the Soviet grain harvest is incredibly bountiful, isn't it comrade?" fealty test.Insisting there are credentials which are required to be non-biased is just confirmation. Of course truth comes only from a Professor of Gender Equality employed at the Diversity and Decolonization department. All who diverge from these proclamations are to be shunned and beaten, lest you be shunned and beaten.
>>18170408Poor people = low IQ, nothing surprising.> why does Greece score so low?Greece is le poor.
>>18170408>same rehashed data from Richard LynnWe really don't need to rely on this crap anymore now that this site exists: https://international-iq-test.com/en/test/IQ_by_country
>>18171649How can there be +3IQ diff change in a year? Are people getting smarter because ChatGPT?
>>18171655It's a literal online IQ test. Not even proctored. Imagine if Lynn used that kek
>>18170408>Turkey and Central AsiaDoes Turkic dna make any other dna they mix with dumb?
>>18171605?Belarus and Slovakia haven't been bombed.
>>18171699Turkey scores 90, which is above the world average of 85.
>>18171610>Poor people = low IQToo many states break that rule. There's rich "low iq" states and "high iq" states where everyone is underpaid and earning way below what they could if they moved elsewhere like East Asia and East Europe.
>>18171608You talk like a terminally online boomer. Word for word, and just as delusional too.
>>18170434>Implying GDP=tourism
Am I a shizo or wasn't IQ basically debunked as a tool of measuring intelligence years ago?I am very happy to be correctedon this but I am certain that "IQ" has joined BMI in the list of basically worthless measurements which tend to not really be useful to show anything at all (or have been replaced by far more useful metrics)
>>18171870It's meant for educational testing in a school system and testing within a system/sample pool. Outside of that it doesn't rrally translate well.
>>18171870No
>>18170408isn't 100 meant to be the mean iq. if so, the fact that this map is showing almost half of the population of the earth with sub 80, while the rest is around 100 and that does not compute. if africans are lower iq then europeans, the increasing population of africa is actually increasing the overall iq of the world by making the average / 100 loweradd about 10 to all these numbers and it makes sense
>>18171900The ethnic British is set to 100.
>>18171900and by increasing the world iq in a sense that today's 100 is actually lower than 100 was 50 years ago.
>>18170408Why is there such a big drop-off in IQ between Hungary and Romania? (Considering most of Romania used to be a part of Hungary)
>>18171903You mean that if we are using the central tendency stats and norm of those pegged to the 1970s, people in 2025 would score lower?
>>18171157This is cherry-picked. Most countries in Africa and elsewhere have decent sample sizes
>>18171864>Too many states break that rule.Maybe read the paper? In an OP paper strong correlation between IQ and GDP per capita was observed (r = .82).
>>18171649Thirdies love this website because it gives absurdly high scores to their shithole countries. Just imagine believing that Iranians are as smart as Japanese kekw
>>18171870its good for noticing actual intellectual disabilities but for any sort of objective intelligence no.
>>18171912Its full of Romanians.
>>18170564the industrial revolution was a mistake.
>>18170408bump
>>18172551>Most countries in Africa and elsewhere have decent sample sizesNot even close. Some use estimates (lol) based on surrounding states. Others use EXTREMELY old and/or outlier data in tbe worst ways possible for really high and low values.
>>18172630>Just imagine believing that Iranians are as smart as JapaneseThey are though based of their proportion of the global pop.
>>18170408>MoroccoLmao big L
>>18170408>Leonardo ParraFirstWho is this guy??Second >Pisa testSerious that rich countries can provide better education and conditions for their population? That's surprising.
>>18170408Are Inuits really smarter than the rest of the Amerindians or is that just local whites tipping the scale?>>18170564Get a job, stinky.
>>18171912Every smart person left Romanian as soon as they possibly could in the 80s and 90s.
>>18175324Romania*
>>18170408National IQ stats are worthless, desu.
>>18170408What would IQ averages and maps look like if we removed all the red countries in the OP? Which countries become the new red ones?
>>18174308>Some use estimates (lol) based on surrounding states.Who cares? Why do we have to autistically stay within the borders of fake third world "countries" if the populations are the same?
>>18174341I don't think Saudi Arabia scores very high on PISA desu
>>18171649>>18174312everyone can anonymously do this test online, cheating and doing it again, absolutely useless
>>18170408I’ve heard a theory before that meds are more artistically intelligent then north euros but less mathematically intelligent. Kinda explains why their IQ scores aren’t impressive but they’re so much better at creating art and culture. Italian painters and German engineers you know?
>averageBut what's the median
>>18175735And when would that have become true? Surely not during antiquity. Not during the medieval period either. If that's true it can't have been always true.
>>18170408if afghanistan is so low IQ how did americans lose with such humiliation? low IQ map
>>18175769Why not? The avg person in ancient/medieval times was an illiterate peasant farmer. They didn’t need to be that smart. The top 25% of people were running society, they were the only ones who needed to be smart. Besides 95 IQ isn’t THAT bad, you can build a somewhat stable community with that.
>>18175735Meds got Ayyrab'd. Modern meds are emotional creatures like Arabs and Indians unlike their forefathers who invented stoicism
>>18175813/pol/
>>18175815>no argument
>>18175819>haplo retard
>>18171157According to Lynn Data Jamaica has an average IQ of 72-79 yet on every international testing Jamaica scores the Latin America average All confirms he was bias against blacks if that country scores around the same as Argentina
>>18171610>North Korea says hi
>>18170434>>18170587>>18171534Wakanda will never exist. You will never ever have a functional civilisation
>>18175792>you can build a somewhat stable community with that.You can do thay with 85s. Community stability is much more complex than just asspulling speculatiom based off memeQ numbers.
>>18175363>Why do we have to autistically stay within the borders of fake third world "countries" if the populations are the sameNot even remotely close. Pulling that logic in any rigourousnsettingnhwta you laughed out the building
>>18174308Yes it is true.Out of 24 countries only 2 have N<100. Markings are next to the six countries mentioned in your pic. It's pure cherry picking nothing more.Also notice how there is exact sample size stated in all countries but two (Eritrea, Somalia) these also happen to be the countries with the highest sample sizes in that selection.Hmmmmmmmmm almost as if...
>>18175791Taliban government fell within two months of the invasion anon
>>18170587>I mean people who don't have RationalWiki page
>Your intelligence is based on how you predict the next item in the sequenceWhy did this meme become popular?
This is going to blow your fat little minds all the way to wherever your real father is hanging out, but people who hold racial antipathy can produce and report solid data, and if the data is solid it does not indicate racial antipathy either way.You don't understand this because you are personally sweaty and deeply emotionally involved in what you think are rational debates, but it's really just you shrieking at your broken-down drudge of a single mother to get you more choccy milk and tasty snacks, and both of you always lose.Grown-ups who count things for a living aren't like that.
>>18176234Get some new material, thanks
>>18176231What else do we have? Numbers of objects and simple mathematical patterns are one of a handful of things that can be universally agreed upon by everyone who isn't basically a dog
>>18176075Jamaica participated in EGRA in 2014 and they scored 374 points which is equivalent to 78 IQ.They haven't participated in anything else expect for 2022 PISA
>>18170408Isn't there rational variations?For example, Northern Italy has some of the highest average IQs in Europe
>>18176231because it's true? How else do you measure intelligence?
>>18176239>Get some new material, thanksYeah fat-ass wants his "le niggers le jews" map painting thread to be cracking with fresh new contentIf he gets bored and angry he's going to violently eat for 6 hours straightGotta keep the /his/pol/ niggers jews thread innovative all 20 times it gets posted in a day
>>18176217>government falling = people are stupidwow such a bright conclusion
>>18176260>implying that is what I said = (You) are stupid
>>18176253So no new material? Disappointing
>>18176266You keep asking for new material, but let me ask you this: Every time you see this content, are you still a big fat-ass fat guts little butterball fatty fat?Can you get us some new content before we have to put in the work to clean up your greasy, jizz-stank environment?Or are you the special little guy who makes the rules?
>>18176274You can report the thread, anon, you don't need to have a meltdown over it
>>18176278If you literally self-throatfuck half the volume of food in 2026 than you did in 2025, will that be exciting new content that you want, Captain Blood Sugar?Or are you going to do it the same way again?I bet you're going to give us the same content again, aren't you? Disappointing an hypocritical
>>18176283>the meltdown continues You'll burst a blood vessel if you keep this up
>>18176293Here this is some new content I made just for youYour nutritionist isn't just warming up the same old content for you every year, you just keep being morbidly obese during your physical primehere this new content will stimulate your freudian nightmare of a brain the way you want, but you will still be angry and eating
>>18176302Your blood pressure is spiking over an IQ chart
>>18176307you should get some new material
>>18171157Data having a large margin of error does not make them automatically wrong, nor that no correct conclusions can be drawn on it. If you know and can identify the bias of the data you can account for it and get a largely correct result. The fact that data free of said bias shows the same results is proof that Lynn was correct.
>>18176408This is correctFor instance, if you see somebody write "one set of data proves that a uselessly flawed set of data is correct" then you have a data point suggesting the are stupid as fuck and have no clue how any of this worksIf you run into other evidence that suggests the poster is stupid and illiterate, then it proves the flawed conclusion you drew from the tiny meaningless sample sizeExcellent work fellow scholars
>>18176415>you drew from the tiny meaningless sample sizeyou still sticking to this meme nigga? What about 37 thousand people is tiny >>18176198
