[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_2164.jpg (328 KB, 2076x329)
328 KB
328 KB JPG
What has led people to call century-long colonial projects and slavery done by whites as “jewish”? It seems to be a deflection campaign of some kind. These are the same people who say “da JOOZ took over in 20th century”. Use critical thinking and ask yourself how jews could ferry millions of people when they didn’t even have power yet.
>>
>>18216746
Just lol at the idea that a tiny, persecuted group secretly orchestrated the very empires that were oppressing them. Ask yourself, who actually benefits from pushing this kikeboogeyman version of history?
>>
>>18216759
Rich elites with a vested interest in expansion and imperialism and the super vocal minority of middle class guya who are super sychophatic and vaguely educated?
>>
>>18216759
>Just lol at the idea that a tiny, persecuted group secretly orchestrated the very empires that were oppressing them
Yeah it’s strange when they blame jews for the Atlantic Slave Trade when most slaves were brought over by Spain and Portugal and Spain and Portugal literally expelled the jews at the start of the Atlantic Slave Trade.
>>
>>18216761
You don't actually believe it's rich elites peddling this right. Like any /pol/fag can rock up to the Gates Foundation and get a $100,000 grant to write a book about why The Jews™ are responsible for Russia's high HIV rates
>>
>>18216746
They say jews did the colonizing and owned the slave ships. But if whites ever feel that brown/blacks are being too "uppity", they will gladly correct themselves and set the record straight on how whites were the ones holding the wheel.
>>
>>18216810
They always flip flop
>>
>>18216746
It was the trade specifically from the Caribbean to Newport RI that was Jewish
>>
It's the age-old anti-semitism bell curve. What separates the Kevin Mcdonalds' from the Candace Owens'.
>>
>>18216768
They expelled them to Holland, the Ottoman Empire, and the Colonies
The jews engaged in slave trade everywhere they went
Curacao has the oldest jewish synagogue, North Atlantic slave trade was also jew-domimated as the records show
>>
>>18217128
>>18217078
It’s like they are living in a parallel reality
>>
>>18217140
https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Jews_and_the_transatlantic_slave_trade
>>
>>18217128
Jews ruled the Ottoman Empire. Incredible. And every single colony (you don’t even specify what colonies you’re referring to).
>>
>>18217521
>jews ruled the Ottoman empire
source?
as for the rest of your comment, I already posted a link
>>
>>18218117
A link that doesn’t work. Just shut the fuck and stop with your historical revision.
>>
>>18218411
works well enough for me
>The first Jew to begin trading with the Indians was Hayman Levy, who imported cheap glass beads, textiles, earrings, armbands and other cheap adornments from Holland which were traded for valuable fur pelts. Hayman Levy was soon joined by Jews Nicholas Lowe and Joseph Simon. Lowe conceived the idea of trading rum and whiskey to the Indians and set up a distillery in Newport, where these two liquors were produced. Within a short time there were 22 distilleries in Newport, all of them owned by Jews, manufacturing and distributing 'firewater.' The story of the debauching of the Indians with its resultant massacres of the early settlers, is a dramatic story in itself.

>It is essential to comprehend the seaport of Newport. It is important in order to recognize the Jewish share in the Slave commerce. There was a period when it was commonly referred to as 'The Jewish Newport-World center of Slave Commerce.' All together, at this time, there were in North America six Jewish communities: Newport, Charleston, New York, Philadelphia, Richmond, and Savanuah. There were also many other Jews, scattered over the entire East Coast. Although New York held first place in the settlers of Jews in North America, Newport held second place.

>New York was also the main source of Kosher meat, supplying the North American settlements, then the West Indies and also South America. Now Newport took over! Newport also became the great trade harbour of the East Coast of North America. There, vessels from other ports met, to exchange commodities. Newport, as previously mentioned, represented the foremost place in the commerce of rum, whiskey, and liquor dealings. And to conclude, it finally became the Main Center of Slave dealings. It was from this port that the ships left on their way across the ocean, to gather their black human cargo and then derive great sums of money in exchange for them.
>>
*ahem*
DESPITE
>>
>>18216746
jews are white, as white as any other euro ethinicity
>>
>>18216746
Name a single phenomenon from the Big Bang to the heat death of the universe that didn't happen because the Jews willed it so.
>>
>>18216746
This is a bizarre theory being pushed by chuddies but it hits the most basic obstacle - Spain and Portugal not only became infamous for expelling Jews but they explicitly prohibited them from travelling to the New World. Not just Jews but anybody who was not a Spanish speaking Spaniard from Castile was pretty much forbidden to set foot on a ship travelling from Seville to the West. Even Catalans were barred from migrating to New Spain. This only changed after 1800s when most of the Spanish empire collapsed.
>>
>>18219837
Not really, since they only gave a shit about *unrepentant* jews. "New Christians" were free to do whatever
>>
>>18216746
For whites, blaming everything on "jews" has become something of a moralistic laundry scheme where they can attribute all the evils they have committed onto a very influential population of whites. Jews do something similar where they blame stuff on whites on mainstream media. The goal is the same as always: detract as much of the public's focus on class struggle as you can. Focus on race, culture, ethnicity etc.
It goes without saying that whites and jews are literally the same. That's why white "Christianity" like Catholicism and Mormonism is so radically different from actual Christianity.
>>
>>18219846
This is why we need flags, I don't know what sort of mystery meat diasporoid is behind posts like this
>>
>>18219852
That would just drop the quality of posts down and give you more reasons to be off topic instead of addressing the question. I thought you left /his/ a few days ago because it got really bad. Why are you still trying to derail good threads?
>>
>>18219861
>I want to treat this place like /int/...but with zero pushback!
Ok mystery meat, I mean that's what you're doing now lol
>>
>>18219839
>it was the conversos!!
There is no winning with you people…
>>
>>18217128
>Jews bulid all European empires
why are white "people" incapable of doing anything by themselves?
>>
>>18219863
It’s so tiresome
>>
>>18216759
Jews pretending they are weak and helpless is very funny to me.
>>
>>18219852
>I can't argue against this guy so I need a flag to detract meaningless shitflinging from the conversation instead of admitting I can't btfo his viewpoint
Just go back to /pol/ or /int/. You aren't emotionally mature enough to hear opinions you don't like without breaking down about niggers and brown people.
>>
>>18219846
This is accurate. Every fucking time someone posts an infograph from /pol/ about how jews in control of everything all that I see just a white people being in charge.
>>
>>18219846
>class struggle
Commies have an incomplete analysis on class based societies that completely ignores the realities of racial congregation, with one ethnically homogenous upper class, and numerous conquered swarthy peasantry that are forced to minimize contact with the aristocracy. Why? Because it helps keep the bloodline pure.
>>
>>18220904
Ashkenazi are jews that skinwalk as white people, tranny.
>>
>>18220918
>stop talking about rich people fucking you over and start hating the black guy next door instead REEEEE
It's not gonna work anymore, glowie. Inflation is killing working people. Hungry people don't care about poltranny ideology.
>>
>>18221047
How deluded do you have to be to pretend not to notice how racist the working class is becoming?
>>
>>18221070
>dude some normie criticized Israel that means we'll all be Nazis in two more weeks
The working class despises Israel because they operate within the moral framework of "we don't want children to be bombed by the idf". You despise Israel because they're jewish and you associate that with some german tranny losing a war he started 80 years ago.

You are not the same.
>>
>>18216746
Many historical books written by Jews proudly describe how Jews participated in thralldom as thrall owners. For that distant epoch, it was prestigious.

In Judaism, the Book of Exodus (Shmot) 21:2
"If you buy a Jewish thrall, let him work for six years, and in the seventh let him be released for free."
In Christianism, a Christian thrall worked for a Christian thrall-owner all his life, until death
>>
>>18221142
>random, unprompted rant about israel
Your master has a lot of work to do.
>>
>>18216746
(((merchants))) are jewish and navy is (((phoenician)))
colonial enterprises could only be made and funded by people with money = jews
>>
>>18220944
>tranny
Why are trannies always on your mind?
>>
>>18221244
>why is this thing constantly shoved in your face sometimes mentioned in discussion
I dunno. It is a mystery
>>
>>18221283
This topic has nothing to do with trannies. You brought them up because you’re insane and obsessed.
>>
>>18221244
And yet ashkenazis are still not white.
>>
>>18221047
>erratic babbling
I can tell this post is written by a miscegenated irishman.
>>
>>18221142
Why is it that pinkos like to virtue signal so much when their daddy Marx spits on moralfagging humanists like yourself?
>>
>>18220918
>Commies have an incomplete analysis on class based societies that completely ignores the realities of racial congregation
Marx's blunt observations on capitalism hurting your feelings isn't an incomplete analysis. But we both know you didn't read his book to even know what he talked about.
>Because it helps keep the bloodline pure.
Late 1800s Europe was the best example of the might of the common man (Napoleon and his armies) and the cowardice and impotence of "noble dynasties". Even before that, Byzantines giving their daughters out to Arab warlords of commoner origin to delay facing the consequences of their poor administration should have gotten the message across that man is merely a man and the mark he leaves to the world is his own to forge. The false notion that someone is inherently born above others has proved to be untrue time and time again. I really wonder, has this world view of yours been a factor in you being a shut in? Seriously this reverence for noble dynasties borders on cuckoldry.
>>
>>18221229
>>18221332
>>18221335
Cope harder stormnigger. Anti Jewish criticism is mainstream now because of bleeding heart leftoids. Not balding neo Nazis in mommy's basement.
>>
>>18221283
Trannies haven't been mainstream for over a year now. You are just an obsessed homosexual at this point.
>>
>>18221338
>Marx's blunt observations on capitalism hurting your feelings isn't an incomplete analysis. But we both know you didn't read his book to even know what he talked about.
You leftypol midwits love to make a bunch of ungrounded assumptions about other's people characters and their intentions.
>Late 1800s Europe was the best example of the might of the common man (Napoleon and his armies) and the cowardice and impotence of "noble dynasties".
Napoleon and his armies consisted primarily of Norman stock, which is why his armies were so successful. Evidence being that the majority Frenchmen managed to return from the winters of Russia during France's invasion, while the Prussians did not.
>Even before that, Byzantines giving their daughters out to Arab warlords of commoner origin to delay facing the consequences of their poor administration should have gotten the message across that man is merely a man and the mark he leaves to the world is his own to forge
This only further cements the rule that empires rise and fall once the ruling classes face the very real threat of mongrelization, and in turn a foreign ethnicity takes over.
>The false notion that someone is inherently born above others has proved to be untrue time and time again.
Vacuous statement.
>I really wonder, has this world view of yours been a factor in you being a shut in? Seriously this reverence for noble dynasties borders on cuckoldry.
You completely misunderstand my position because you're a braindead commie. Class exists due to race, not the other way around.
>>
>>18221366
>Anti Jewish criticism is mainstream now because of bleeding heart leftoids.
And?
>>
>>18219852
>gets intellectually btfo so he desperately wishes he could try and derail the debate by focusing on something else
Flags are irrelevant in the age of VPN anyways, who the fuck still uses the internet without one?
>>
>>18221374
Napoleon's army didn't consist of any one stock. That's logistically impossible. "Norman" is strictly a regional toponym among French. Ethnic/national connotations to the word faded away after Normans settled and mixed with locals.
And besides, Vikings were massive pussies. They failed every invasion they tried to launch against noneuropean people. They got chased out by Arabs and Native Americans. There's a reason why Napoleon opted to hire Mamelukes as his personal guard and for his imperial guard.
Anatolia has never mongrelized. The small populations of Arabs and turkic tribals were not settling the area during Rise of Islam. What happened to the Byzantines was that an opulent nation of "noble" degenerates stuck on their past wanted to keep play tit for tat with Arabs forever like they did with Iranians for thousands of years. Arabs weren't interested in wasting their time so they curbstomped the byzantrannies instead.
>>
Look at how this thread has been derailed.
>>
>>18221410
>Napoleon's army didn't consist of any one stock. That's logistically impossible. "Norman" is strictly a regional toponym among French. Ethnic/national connotations to the word faded away after Normans settled and mixed with locals.
Yes, Normans are indeed Frenchmen. What sheer pedantry on display.
>And besides, Vikings were massive pussies. They failed every invasion they tried to launch against noneuropean people. They got chased out by Arabs and Native Americans.
LOL. You are a very funny man.
>There's a reason why Napoleon opted to hire Mamelukes as his personal guard and for his imperial guard.
Take a wild guess as to what "Mameluke" means in this instance.
>Anatolia has never mongrelized. The small populations of Arabs and turkic tribals were not settling the area during Rise of Islam.
It doesn't matter, they were inferior and brown which is why they never mastered civilization like anglo-norman bvlls did before them.
>What happened to the Byzantines was that an opulent nation of "noble" degenerates stuck on their past wanted to keep play tit for tat with Arabs forever like they did with Iranians for thousands of years. Arabs weren't interested in wasting their time so they curbstomped the byzantrannies instead.
Okay, the multicultural empire miscegenated itself out of existence which slowly destabilized the empire until the semitic middle eastern barbarians raped everyone. What's your point?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.