If the ancient Sumerians were supposedly swarthy wogs, why do so many of their statues of kings and gods have blue eyes? Is it possible they might have had a blue-eyed elite ruling over the brown-eyed masses?
>>18219354>we wuz kangz but white people
>>18219357But is it wrong doe?
>>18219354Fuck off
>>18219375clearly. White people were retards until the renaissance
>>18219415>t. some unwashed global southerner
>>18219354They must have had blue nipple elites according to your retarded logic
>>18219354>Is it possible they might have had a blue-eyed elite ruling over the brown-eyed masses?They basically all but say this outright. If not, their white larping makes no sense. Every indian implicitly acknowledges the elite castes were historically white skinned and viewed the brown skinned as human cattle. The way to get them to admit it is to let them talk about why they're really honorary Europeans and it will slip out
>Is it possible they might have had a blue-eyed elite ruling over the brown-eyed masses?Muh elite is always the cope they fall back on when genetic data doesn't line up with the dumb nordic theories. The phenotypes in their art are not European at all, but depict large sloping nosed MENA types with unibrows and gracile jaws.
>>18219416alright I'll give you until the late medieval period
>>18219445it's the other way around, the elite cope is what THEY rely on to larp as white.
>>18219457>t. guy who would REALLY hate to classify Greeks or Romans as white people because that inferiority complex would get a lot worse.
>>18219354The Sumerians referred to themselves as ùĝ saĝ gíg-ga (cuneiform: 𒌦 𒊕 𒈪 𒂵), phonetically uŋ saŋ giga, literally meaning "the black-headed people", retard.
>>18219487they were meds
yes the other defining european trait besides blue eyes is thick bushy unibrowsdead ringer
>>18219487let's consult the whiteness map
>>18219499Black haired people can have blue eyes.>>18219530O.k. now do since all of history.
>>18219536that would shift it over to the middle east bub
>>18219354Yes the Ancient Middle Easterners were white like Armenians until the Arab invasions.
>>18219540Which was White-ruled from the Sumerians to the Arabs
>>18219536Europeans have brown hair, not black, jackass. Those with dark hair are Asians and Africans. The allele for blue eyes is polygenomic with the one for lighter hair, and the hair of the Sumerians, in addition to being black, was curly, not straight like most people with blue eyes.
UD REA
>>18219354Lapis Lazuli was expensive so they used it to make their statues more valuable.
>>18219354Because the lapis lazuli is a pretty color? The Sumerians didn’t even exist in terms of genetics. Other than their culture they are indistinguishable from their Semitic speaking counterparts up north or modern day Iraqis.
>>18219354Swarthy people can have blue eyes.>>18219357Absolutely not the same thing Iraqis and the Sumerians are Caucasian so racially very similar to white people.>>18219409Blue eyes are not exclusive to white people I can't believe I even need to say this.
>>18219854do you realize middle eastern people can have blue eyes?
The use of these statues was to have them placed in temples as a substitute for the worshipper, so they were eternally praying to the gods as a proxy (the clenched hands is the prayer gesture). From that it's assumed that the lapis lazuli found in the higher status examples doesn't indicate eye colour but 'purity' of gaze/intention, or an idea of the worshipper being filled with divine power through gazing on the statues of the gods or, quite possibly, that the gods will find the gaze of a statue with lapis lazuli eyes more appealing/eye-catching and will therefore favour the worshipper more - there are extracts in myth of Inanna and other gods specifically liking lapis.
>>18219939The other thing is also using more wealth to make something = more piety or, rather, piety appropriate to someone's station, and there's a certain limit on form in the sense that the statue has to be of a dude worshipping and can't be insanely big as it has to go inside a temple (and also the king wouldn't like that). So you would make it out of as costly materials as you could and add them where you can, so irises and nipples. I imagine there must have been even higher statue gold or silver ones but those would have been eventually melted down.
>>18219357white people having done everything everywhere is just historythats why its sad and funny when non whites claim they weren't either slaves (blacks) or shameful irrelevant mixed race mutts (browns)
>>18219996"Slave" is derived from white Slavs who were slaves of brown Byzantines and Arabs.
>>18220120>we wuz kangsYou wuz slaves and shameful mixed race brownoids. That's all you ever were and there's no point trying to rewrite your history.
>>18219423Literally, yes, faggot. Even the ancient Greeks painted/tattooed blue on and around their nipples ;) We got it on statues and everything. Often is a bit of a sun ray patter. Go look, Retard ;) 100% white figure with intentionally blue eyes........."It's clearly my Jewish ancestor". LOL! No, this PROVES that the swarts were rules by the Brights. Many, many, many, many such cases
>>18219891Because they are "impure" Middle Easterners with lots of pure White blood in them. There is no such thing as "naturally blue eyed" Semite. No, no there is not. Name one kike in the kike book that is described as having Blue-eyes, which were always of note among the swarts from the Greeks to the Romans to the Carthaginians. Name one blue-eyed Jew........I dare ya ;>)
>>18219499That only raises more questions. White people can have black hair. But basically no one but White people has anything but black hair. So if the Sumerians identified themselves by their black hair who were they comparing themselves against that didn't have black hair?
>>18219354the Sumerians like the world was is taken over by the Ke Na Ani i mean Ani Na Ke
>>18220315>neolithic farmer stock so white europeanidlol
>>18220298Most Europeans have brown hair. Blond hair are uncommon in Anatolia because the gene for blue eyes is polygenic with the genes for lighter hair and they have little EHG/Steppe mixture who carried this. Even the EEF (ANF+WHG, who had blue eyes) were a predominantly brown-eyed population because because they are mostly ANF and the lack of polygeny with EHG/ANE. Otherwise, the EEF would be so white that the IE that all Europeans would become Nordic.
>>18219354In thousands of years when archaeologists are examining anime artifacts what race will they think the Japanese were?
>>18220344What I mean is that lighter hair and eyes are not impossible for a population with genes that didn't originate/carry that trait, it's possible to change that, and even the EHG/Steppe themselves were originally populations with dark hair/eyes that underwent sexual selection because they had that gene and geography where this was advantageous. But even the ANF/EEF didn't undergo sexual selection for that in Europe even when being neighbors/mixing with populations that were already doing so, so what would lead you to believe that it would be common in the Middle East, where they barely have WHG, EHG, Steppe, etc... which would create polygenesis for sexual selection these tractes?
>>18220367That's a bad comparison. There's shit tons of anime and manga with true to life hair and eye colors. And they even frequently use characters being blonde haired and blue eyed as an explicit signifier of foreignness.
>>18220344>Most Europeans have brown hair, not dark hairFix'd and repeating this again so you don't create a strawman.
>>18219354that must be it, you should rule the world from your mama's basement
>>18220277I said name one, Moshe......and you cannot. I win!
>>18220282It describes yahoo's dick in detail and may other traits. The reason "nobody" has their eyes described, is because there was nothing "remarkable" about the fact that they were all black-eye shitskins. It's just biology. 100% of your history takes place among black people in Africa and swarts in the neighboring regions. You have the lips, noses and "fros" to prove it ;) Other charcters in the kike book are also described by color, such as David being called "red", et. al. They were well aware of anything interesting/unusual in physical appearances and any "blemishes" would've made a priest "impure" and unfit for duty. Therefore, no such trait would be selected for. Meanwhile, 100% of all other peoples in the region make note of the innate beauty of White people. From Rhodopids to Helen to Cleopatra to Artemis to Athena to Ganeymeade, etc...etc.....were all noted by your fellow browns and black for their light, bright, white, golden, grey/blue/clea eyes. You're a jew. You're a nigger. COPE.
>>18220284Next you're gonna say they have blue nipples too, amirite?
>>18219423Explain the multiple egyptian statues with blue and green eyes
>>18219499Why the black headed people and not just the black people? Black hair doesnt automatically mean they were nafri niggers
>>18219357We were Kings.
>>18219996sorry anon but the bronze age was not defined by white people
>>18219354>Snownigger Nordic: You Seanigger christian Meds aren't descendants of these ancient civilizations it's us>Seanigger Meds: You Sandnigger muslim Menas aren't descendants of these ancient civilizations it's us>Sandnigger Menas: You Sub-saharan pagan niggers aren't descendants of these civilisations it's usSamefag abrahamic wewuzzers = Memefag larpagan wewuzzers
>>18219354>kings and godsthese were of alien origin and I mean space aliens not guys hopping through border
>>18219423>he didn't have blue eyes, blue blood and blue nipplesyou are not of godly heritage
>>18219530>swedes aren't whiteI am OK with this
>>18219354The eyebrows do not look very European.
ok why didnt the nordic blue eyed white kangz develop a sofisticated ancient civilization in spain or southern france thenno muh it was too cold excuse
>>18221330because they were all brown and therefore "unremarkable" whilst blue-eyes were noted by all other peoples around the world throughout history. There were no blue-eyed jews. There are no blue-eyed jews.
They had blue eyes and fair to olive skin. So did Hebrews.
>>18222020Carrying the allele ≠ having it as a dominant trait in the body. Populations where these recessive alleles arose did not manifest them until polygenic and sexual selection.
>>18222031Kys. Yamnaya had alleles for blond hair and blue eyes but did not express them like their matrilinear descendents with Corded Ware.>People of the Yamnaya culture are believed to have had mostly brown eye colour, light to intermediate skin, and brown hair colour, with some variation>Some Yamnaya individuals are believed to have carried a mutation to the KITLG gene associated with blond hair, as several individuals with Steppe ancestry are later found to carry this mutation. The Ancient North Eurasian Afontova Gora group, who contributed significant ancestry to Western Steppe Herders, are believed to be the source of this mutation. A study in 2015 found that Yamnaya had the highest ever calculated genetic selection for height of any of the ancient populations tested. It has been hypothesized that an allele associated with lactase persistence (conferring lactose tolerance into adulthood) was brought to Europe from the steppe by Yamnaya-related migrations>A 2022 study by Lazaridis et al. found that the typical phenotype among the Yamnaya population was brown eyes, brown hair, and intermediate skin colour. None of their Yamnaya samples were predicted to have either blue eyes or blond hair, in contrast with later Steppe groups in Russia and Central Asia, as well as the Bell Beaker culture in Europe, who did carry these phenotypes in significant proportions
>>18222034And where in your text does it say these Levantine men and women had the blue-eye allele?
>>18222039>Levantine men and women coupleFix'd.
>>18222045And where in your text does it say these Levantine men and women couple who had the blue-eye allele met so often that they created a minority local ethnicity with blue eyes in the Middle East? This shit only happens in Central Asia.
>>18222046Where are the Tajiks of the Middle East, retard?
>>18222057>PalestiniansTopkek. They don't even compare in terms of blue eyes to those in Central Asia.
>>18222064For comparison, people without blue eyes there still appear whiter than they do.
>>18219890>Blue eyes are not exclusive to white people I can't believe I even need to say this.Blue eyed people are overwhelmingly in Europe, and are insignificant populations in other places, all of which are partially European admixed. All of the current theories on the emergence of blue eyes point to Europe as the origin. So it kind of is a "white people" thing.
>>18219501In other words Southern Europeans in other words European in other words descended overwhelmingly from ANF, PIE, and WHG, in other words white.
>>18222264greek don't see you nordic as european.
>>18222029Use some common sense. You're too ignorant to get the nipple reference and you've never seen this dune coon's genome, so you have no idea what is "real" and what is not. Blue eyes require matched, recessive alleles which isn't possible among two "true Semites", like yourself. Blue eyes were always remarkable among your swarthy ancestors and other medfags. The fact that they were never remarked upon in the bible proves they weren't there at all. It's the same reason snow and reindeer aren't mentioned, but are also real.
>>18219354They were genetically semitic despite the language not being semitic
