So this nigga Indian, right? Why the fuck are Koreans and Japanese fucking with him? Japan is famously known for rejecting foreign religions but they fellate this Indian to death.
he was scythian/sogdian
>>18221787Damn these niggas looking like a 1/3 Magic card
>>18221784>Japan is famously known for rejecting foreign religions but they fellate this Indian to death.Buddhism was introduced to Japan way, way earlier on. The commoners were still pit dwelling when Buddhism had come to Japan. It was a baby nation and it was one of the first things it was exposed to.You cannot extirpate something so deeply enrooted in your society.
>>18221784>Japan is famously known for rejecting foreign religionsonly Christianity reallyIn addition to importing Buddhism to begin with, they regularly accepted new Buddhist sects from the continent instead of going their own way. Both Zen and Shingon have Chinese origins and Onmyoji is rooted in Taoism.
>>18221784>The Shakyas were an eastern sub-Himalayan ethnic group on the periphery, both geographically and culturally, of the eastern Indian subcontinent in the 5th century BCE. Bronkhorst calls this eastern culture Greater Magadha and notes that "Buddhism and Jainism arose in a culture which was recognized as being non-Vedic". According to Levman, the Shakyas were considered outside of the Āryāvarta and of ‘mixed origin’ (saṃkīrṇa-yonayaḥ, possibly part Aryan and part Himalayan). The laws of Manu treats them as being non Aryan. As noted by Levman, "The Baudhāyana-dharmaśāstra (1.1.2.13–4) lists all the tribes of Magadha as being outside the pale of the Āryāvarta; and just visiting them required a purificatory sacrifice as expiation" (In Manu 10.11, 22). This is confirmed by the Ambaṭṭha Sutta, where the Sakyans are said to be "rough-spoken", "of menial origin" and criticised because "they do not honour, respect, esteem, revere or pay homage to Brahmans." Some of the non-Vedic practices of this tribe included incest (marrying their sisters), the worship of trees, tree spirits and nāgas
>>18222001Also:>However, Buddhism notably rejects fundamental Vedic doctrines such as atman (substantial self or soul), Brahman (a universal eternal source of everything) and the existence of a creator God (Ishvara). Instead, Buddhism teaches not-self (anatman) and dependent arising as fundamental metaphysical theories. Buddhism also rejects the scriptural authority of the Vedas (and other Hindu texts) and rejects Vedic teachings regarding ritual, caste and sacrifice
>>18221787Bro, they had Literally 50% jeet ancestry
>So this nigga Indian, right? Why the fuck are Koreans and Japanese fucking with him?Go back to WorldStarHiphop, nigger.
>>18221784>Why the fuck are Koreans and Japanese fucking with him?Because they're smart.
>>18221784>Japan is famously known for rejecting foreign religions but they fellate this Indian to death.He's just that good.
>>18221784He's either Indian, Nepalese or a Nomad. The language has drifted too much to be sure.
>>18221784Japanese language/culture/religion is based upon a mix of Chinese and Brahmi script mixed with Korean and native Japanese characteristics.
>>18221951It wasn't even really a nation then, and they didn't have an inclination to reject anything foreign then. In fact for the most part they embraced anything new they encountered.They did worry that worshipping buddha would piss off the kami, so they did a test run, and by the Meiji restoration they couldn't distinguish Buddhism from Shinto
>>18221784Why the fuck are Koreans and Japanese fucking with him?Buddhism came to China first, and the Chinese basically rewrote all the scriptures in Chinese, and turned the whole religion into a Chinese version which they liked. And the Koreans and Japanese liked anything that was Chinese, so it was a hit
>>18222126He was a Scythian royal. They segregated themselves from the peasants.
>>18221784>>18221787Siddhartha Gautama is a near cognate with Sigvart/Sigebert Geatman/Gothman, and probably referenced Massagetae or Gothic heritage in his family.Batman of Gotham being trained by monks is no coincidence.
>>18221784Jesuits were just absurdly cancerous and, I hate using this word, Subversive. That's the main reason Christianity was prohibited.I don't think there is any religion Japan rejected aside from Christianity. Maybe Tibetan Buddhism coming from the Manchus?They really didn't come to contact with anything that wasn't Buddhism or Chinese. Maybe a stray SEA hindu once a decade.
>>18222001The Buddha was a hapa
>>18222452Banning Christianity was, bizarrely, a national security measure.
>>18222459Shakyas ancestors were banished by his Ikshvaku Vedic Aryan parents to the interior of Himalayas. I think they mix because of the infertility/madness caused by inbreeding.>Ikshvaku is first recorded in the Rigveda (10.60.4) in a position of high honour and being associated with the Pancha-jana or "Five Tribes". These Vedic tribes included the Anu, Druhyu, Puru, Turvaśa, and Yadu who were prominent in the Early Vedic Era and associated with the Lunar Dynasty, signifying an Aryan origin>"At the place of the ship's descent at the top of the Himalayas, there resides the vision of immortality from which the Kushta plant was born; which the Ikshwakus previously knew" —Atharvaveda, 19.39.8–9>This is confirmed by anthropological research showing that incest was institutionalised in Rama's race, the Ikshvaku dynasty of Aryan Kshatriyas : "In the Anabattha Sutta and the Mahavastu Avadana we are told that the Ikshvaku princes, who were banished by their father and took shelter on the slopes of the Himalayas, and from whom the Sakyas traced their descent, married their own sisters in order to maintain the purity of their line." -- [Chandra, p.155]
>>18222437You sound like you read Miguel Serrano books
>>18222483tldr;Sakyas are the "Ptolemaics" of the Himalayas,- being of ethnic western steppe origin much like the yamna-macedonian origin of the Ptolemaics themselves.
>>18222490>You sound like you readWhy should I limit myself to the opinions of men when the birds tell me all that happens in the realm, master bateman?
>>18222001>>18222005>>18222483The funny thing is that Buddhist writers we wuzzing Chandragupta Maurya, founder of the first Indian empire, with the Shakyas because of his grandson Ashoka's patronage of them.>The Puranas describe Mauryas as Shudras>'Mudrakshasa' of Vishakhadatta uses the terms Vrishal/Kulhina (of low clan)>The Classical writers, such as Justin, describe Chandragupta only as a man of humble origin>The Junagarh Rock Inscription of Rudradaman (150 AD) has some indirect evidence, suggesting that Mauryas might have been of Vaishya origin>The Buddhist work, on the other hand, try to link the Mauryan dynasty with the Sakya Kshatriya clan to which Buddha belonged>According to them, the region from which the Mauryas came was full of peacocks (Mor), and hence they came to known as 'Moriyas'>It is obvious from this that the Buddhists were trying to elevate the social position of Ashoka (their patron) and his predecessors>In conclusion, we can say that the Mauryas belonged to the Moriya tribe and were certainly of a low caste, though it is not clear as to which low caste
>>18222492Incest was not only common among and before the (foreign) nobility in Egypt, common people practiced it as well.https://desuarchive.org/his/thread/17575821/
