Everyone in this shitty board makes their own shitposts without effort or much thought put on. So here is my half-effort shitpost. Feel free to correct me or agree with me.Most historical genocides, as they are described by mainstream history lore, are a big meme, not only the HolocaustTo carry out the murder of over 1,000,000 in a relatively short span of time, without weapons of mass destruction, or assistance from disease (note, genocide cannot be attributed to disease, because genocide is defined as "Genocide is the destruction of a people through targeted violence.") or famine requires a comically high amount of manpower and effort, and ammunition and cost, why wouldn't you put all the victims to forcibly work for you instead? Indeed, it is what most historical empires did, and the victims often died from overworking, disease, starvation and accidents.It is generally agreed that the Spanish killed about 5,000-20,000 natives in Mexico and Central America as result of the initial wars, a reasonable number considering the multiple massacres of villages (which, were led by other indigenous mexicans as well with enough manpower to do so) consisted in numbers from the hundreds to the low thousands. Unfortunately, up to 8-11 million died of disease afterwards, the millions being common death tolls for diseases.So, why did death tolls afterwards increase from the tens of thousands to tens of millions? 1000x? And why do the numbers of different reports vary so much?Of course, propaganda. Everybody knows the Holocaust denial lore, that 6 million is an important number to the jews. So, what gives, it not being possible for other numbers to have been greatly exaggerated for the importance they would carry during the political discourse of the moment?
Dead Rising Genicide acheivement where you need to kill over 50K zombieshttps://youtu.be/G2mdPKDTmW0?si=676MijHr4ugNy-Nowe dont feel anything about such mind boggling figures because its not real, no connection can be made with such absurdities for good reason. The image we get of genocides are fake and gay.
>>18222061Well damn, that's over 50 thousand in just under 2 hours. Maybe genocides are an actual thing.
>>18222049You're a fucking retard. Do the math, have 1 guy kill 5 people every day. 100,000 soldiers vs a population of 10 million, it would take 20 days to eradicate them. This is assuming that each soldier lacks any empathy, the population is all easily accessible and not spread apart and hidden, and that the population has no capacity to resist. 20 days is all it would take. Now when you look at real genocides of history you realize they're perfectly possible, especially in modern industrial economies. The reason they take far longer than 20 days is because of the issues I said above and more. Holocaust denial is fundamentally anti-white by the way. If retarded niggers in Rwanda can kill 600,000 people in a few months I wholeheartedly believe a white civilization with its strong economy could kill six million kikes.
>>18222049>(note, genocide cannot be attributed to disease, because genocide is defined as "Genocide is the destruction of a people through targeted violence.")I hate to drive you back to the bucket of ice cream in despair, but whatever authority you've latched on to here didn't write that definition so that everyone would know that the green disease fatatlity counter doesn't count for genocide mode in the video game model of history that you have cobbled together.> the millions being common death tolls for diseases.what the fuckshit for brains, could you just say whatever you need to get off your clammy little-boy fatboobs without trying to build a case for it? Cause you don't know how to do that and it's no fun reading the shit you write
>>18222102Put it in practice.If you deployed a hundred thousand soldiers to go on an easter hunt and exterminate the entire civilian population of Hungary in a period of between 20 days and 6 years, do you think they would succeed?
>>18222137>I hate to drive you back to the bucket of ice cream in despair>fatatlity counter doesn't count for genocide mode in the video game model of history>get off your clammy little-boy fatboobsI agree with your post but man you made my audibly sigh
>>18222144>This is assuming that each soldier lacks any empathy, the population is all easily accessible and not spread apart and hidden, and that the population has no capacity to resist. 20 days is all it would take. Now when you look at real genocides of history you realize they're perfectly possible, especially in modern industrial economies. The reason they take far longer than 20 days is because of the issues I said above and more.
>>18222156Yes nigger I did read that. I am asking if you believe so taking into account all of those factors.
>>18222159Hungary is in NATO so you'd need a lot more than 100k men.
>>18222049>it's not genocidal to lock people in squalid dungeons without food or hygiene and then refuse to give people medicine when disease starts to spreadSounds like a cope to admit that yes, your side did that but if you change the definition of the word it helps rehabilitate that side, but go off.
>>18222160NATO is a joke.
>>18222102>Holocaust denial is antiwhiteReminder that you are now seeing this over and over because a literal Rabbi posted it on Twitter
>>18222241So why is Putin shitting and pissing his pants in wild fury every time a new country joins it?
>>18222249Why is the Russian army winning in the Ukraine?
>>18222262Just like they were winning in Afghanistan or how the US was winning in Vietnam? This is a disastrous quagmire which will end in an embarrassing pull out
>>18222292Why is Ukraine begging for a ceasefire?
>>18222309They're not? There's only the US pushing for a ceasefire which both countries don't accept?
>>18222344The US is pushing for a permanent negotiated agreement, not a truce. Ukraine wants a truce in order to rebuild its combat capacity since they know they're losing at the current rate.
>>18222358The US is pushing for a truce as well beside the agreement, agreements follow a truce.>Ukraine wants a truce in order to rebuild its combat capacity since they know they're losing at the current rate.Shit that never happened enthusiast
>>18222066you'd have collect, identify, transport, kill and then burn all those bodies in their proper facilities. This is before considering feeding such people leading up to that point and dispose of the fecal material they produce.
The Irish were not genocided, their crop failed. That's a famine. They continued to export unprocessed oats and winter wheat, not food crops. Britain did aid them just not enough. That's not a genocide it's just bad luck+ poor famine relief
