The metaphysical basis for right wing thought is “human race doesn’t exist, only distinct ethnicities are real”, and on surface levels that is true. But it breaks apart in the level of the subconscious, which is far more important. I was watching the Japanese film Bansho the Bailiff and the way it resonated with me and crawled under my skin and made me cry made me realise peoples really do share the same stuff deep down.
>>18223573Cope and seethe mutt. Shared subconscious is just christian universalism with extra steps. Meanwhile, your distinct ethnicities cope gets BTFO by a single DNA test. Enjoy your larp, reality is a spectrum and you are malding over a social construct.
>>18223573>I think I'm Japanese
>>18223578t. IQ of 86
>>18223578Touch grass. Too many memes in one post.
>>18223573>made me realise peoples really do share the same stuff deep down.What even is this thread? No serious person denies that humanities various groups have a transcendant spirit. That's isn't a basis on which you should seek to turn man into a homogeneous brown blob amalgam.
right wing and left wing are only economic termsfor social politics you may use the terms progressive-reactionary
>>18223611Humanity is already extremely homogeneous genetically speaking. I like diversity of cultures. But my intention was to show how a transcendent spirit is behind it all like you said.
>>18223645>Humanity is already extremely homogeneous genetically speaking.I can't speak on the minutae on this subject but this seems outwardly obviously untrue. If the outward appearances are an extension of genetics than would it not stand to reason that we aren't genetically homogeneous? We don't see 2 bantus under any circumstance giving birth to someone physically indecipherable to a Chinaman, to any statistically significant degree, let alone any at all. I don't think that the value of philosophies and creations of enthnicities can only be appreciated by the enthnicities which birthed them. I think that's a rather insane idea, but I think it's naturally quite ignorant to think that because that's not the case, that these ethnicities are unimportant, and shouldn't seek their own preservation. Afterall, these groups came to be over many thousands of years of history, and it was through them that their creations came to be. It seems rather haphazard to suggest that which brought about all of this should be done away with in favor of a race blind regard for peoples because their value transcends their race, no? Forgive me, it just seems silly. I see where you are coming from, but personally, I only see it as a tastament to the success of homogeneity. It works, it was formed in the fires of history, and it brought people together. Homogeneity is strength. Perhaps we're just missunderstanding a bit.
