Why is there so much art of naked twinks in history?
pedophiles rule the world
>>18238792Because they're aesthetic?
So beautiful and serene, they don't make them like they used to.Anyway, did you really need to censor the statue? They made naked statues of pretty much everything anyway.
>>18239268This is a blue board, anon. Have some shame.
>>18238792there isn't, but the 19th ct homos cherry picked it and filled every textbook with it
>>18239909Even when there are naked female statues, they don't sculpt the vagoo. But they lovingly sculpt every pair of penis and balls.
>>18239905I have more...
>>18240017They absolutely sculpted vaginas, but full nudity was an archetypal form of statuary for it's emphasis on athletic prowess, women generally did not participate in this. The statues usually depict figures in an athletic display or shortly after it, which why the junk is usually quite small, even on the adult male figurines, of which most nude male statuary is composed of. Female figurines, likewise, had their bare breasts exposed and hips emphasized to demonstrate their fertility. Treating historical societies and their culture as goon bait for your retarded culture war shit is cringe and you should stop.
>>182387921. Because you are homosexual.2. Because you like minors.Stop opening threads about this you degenerate sodomite.
>>18240750I'll STOP when I'm DEAD
>>18240752>appreciating beautiful (and sexy) classical sculptures makes you a homosexual nowwhat has this world come to? can people really not enjoy anything anymore?
Can we please start getting these threads moved to /lgbt/ or just deleted entirely? Shotafags can never shut their fucking mouths.
>>18240769Nigga that guy has wings on his back, its not human.
>>18240773>s-stop talking about parts of history i dont like!Reminder:>This board is dedicated to the discussion of history and the other humanities such as philosophy, religion, law, classical artwork, archeology, anthropology, ancient languages, etc. >classical artworkThere are lots of classical sculptures of youthful males in history. Asking why this is the case is a legitimate question. This thread is perfectly suited for /his/. If you don't like it, maybe you should go to another board, such as /lgbt/.Sorry if you can't appreciate classical art, or have no interest in discussing art history, but it doesn't mean you have to seethe about it.
>>18240785You aren't talking about history, you are narrowly selecting a form of cultural expression, in this case nude male statuary, and then aggressively misinterpreting it to bait people into a fight about culture war shit. You would literally be right at home at /pol/ or /lgbt/, fighting with morons about stupid bullshit. Instead you take it here, further worsening the already decaying culture of this board. Please, fuck off.
>>18240789>y-you're destroying the sophistication of muh erudite /his/!No... you're coping and seething because you don't like the fact that people in this thread have an appreciation for classical sculpture of youthful males and want to discuss historical aspects of these sculptures. There are plenty of actual low quality/culture war threads on this board that you could seethe in. I don't even know how you hallucinated muh culture war. Take your medication.
>>18240769>please do not touchKek
>>18238792I recently saw this in person, Orestes and Pilades a roman copy from around the 1st century BC. One of the heads was replaced by Antinoo and the arms were reconstructed.
>>18240794This statue would be less gay if he was actually naked
Would you consider this more hetero- or homoerotic, if it were to be erotic?
>>18240794That outfit is LEWD>>18240769>rekindling the torchThe title of the statue kinda makes it seem like a Castor and Pollux situation where one brings back the other to life
>>18238792It's kino
No? There have been plenty of sexy nude female sculptures as well.
>>18238792patrician taste
>>18240769>>appreciating beautiful (and sexy) classical sculptures makes you a homosexual nowthis is false but that other anon is still correct in asserting that you are a homosexual pedophile. your persistent spam makes this clear enough.
>>18241169Not what was asked.
>>18241169You didn't entertain his stupid bait post, he's going to sternly correct you while he has something shoved so far up his ass he isn't sure if it's going to come out of his nose.
>>18241064This
>>18238792why did you censor a statue? You make me angry
>>18240769>>18240785>>18240794These are 18th century, not ancient. Almost certainly made for closeted homo aristocrats.
>>18241169with Barbie doll crotches. Meanwhile every guy has his foreskin and wrinkled balls perfectly detailed
>>18240769Why are you afraid of being gay?
>>18242053In both renaissance/baroque statuary (you have not been clear which schools you are referencing with your examples) the fully nude female form is present, ubiquitous even. When looking at classical pieces we are of course only discussing the incredibly small volume of extant works, and considering most statues of nude women would have been statues of pagan deities, it is easy to see why they may not have made it down through the historical record.
>>18238792Artists are generally faggots.
>>18242218Feel free to post some
>>18242261Posting images in this dogshit thread will auto bump it, feel free to google nude female statuary followed by whatever school interests you, there is plenty frontal nudity in all mediums and they are mere seconds away.
Boy love is mega based
>>18242267I didn't say frontal nudity, did I? I said non Barbie doll crotches.
>>18242277At most they are covered or obscured in statuary, not smoothed over, but Baroque work especially introduces them and in paintings they are abundant. What exactly are you trying to get at?
>>18242290When are you playing coy? You know exactly what I'm getting at.
>>18242057>appreciating a sculpture makes you gay now
>>18242314You can't reference your own thoughts and get mad when no one has any idea what you are talking about.
>boy statues get posted>enjoyers are normal and chill>poster brings up female statues and vaginas>discourse gets worse and argumentativeTALE AS OLD AS TIME
>>18242341>enjoyers>same dude flipping his VPNs country 5 times in a row to agree with his own thread
>>18242354
>>18242321That is definitely a gay statue. Just come out of the closet. It's almost 2026
