How would you rate these men from most to least evil? Personally I think Hitler was the most evil and Roosevelt was the least evil
Roosevelt > Stalin > Mussolini > Hitler > Hirohito
>>18238948>chaotic evilStalin, Churchill(if he was on the list)>neutral goodMussolini, Hirohito>true neutral Roosevelt>chaotic goodHitler
>>18238954>>true neutral>RooseveltConflicts with Stalin being chaotic evil since FDR simped hard for him
>>18238948From most to least evilRoosevelt>Hirohito>Stalin>Churchill>Hitler>Mussolini
>>18238958Roosevelt seems more like an immoral opportunist rather than someone with any ideological convictions
>>18238948>lawful goodStalin, Mussolini>chaotic good>Roosevelt>neutral evilHitler>chaotic evilHirohito
>>18238948FDR and Stalin were good guys who saved White civilization from child murdering fascists
>>18238948humans arent evil, actions arethat said, most evil is roosevelt followed by hirohito followed by stalin, least evil is mussolini
>>18238967He loved commies and hated old European empires
Most evil is the most authoritarian one, least evil is the least authoritarian one.
>>18238948HirohitoChurchill FDRHitlerMussoliniStalin
OP, your thread is bad
>>18238948>Stalin PURE EVIL>Roosevelt PURE EVIL>MussoliniINCOMPETENT EVIL>HitlerGOOD-EVIL>HirohitoOBJECTIVELY GOOD, nothing hirohito did or stood for was even evil why is he with the rest?
>>18238948Hitler>Stalin>Hirohito>>>>>>POWER GAP>>>>>>Mussolini>Roosevelt
>>18238948Stalin most, Hirohito least
>>18238948Hitler is easily the most evil for killing 6 million Jews and 30 million Soviet civiliansLeast evil is probably Stalin for liberating Europe from fascism and fighting against the international banking cabal
>>18238967Did anybody use his naiveté?
>>18239589Are you a fucking jeet? Cause they're one of the few people I see defending Imperial Japan.
>>18238948My fuarking heroes. None of these men did anything wrong
Roosevelt most, Hitler least
>>18238948Roosevelt > Mussolini > Hirohito > Stalin > Hitler
>>18239898Roosevelt as least, Hitler as most, I'm not Nazbol
Hitler > Mussolini > Hirohito > Roosevelt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stalin
>>18238948From most to leastStalin > Roosevelt > Hitler > Hirohito > Mussolini
>Hitler>Hirohito>Stalin>power gap>Mussolini = Roosevelt
>>18238948Stalin>hitler>fdr>mussolini>hirohito
>>18239589>>18238970Kys chinks/mutts
>>18238948Hitler is the most obvious Chaotic Good character that has ever lived, disregarding any weird israeli-hollywood propaganda they say about him.
>>18238948There is no good or evil. There is only power and those too weak to seek it
>>18239755let's review each of these men's achievements so all of you kike and heet loving cucks can shut the fuck up:> StalinDirectly responsible for 30 million white deaths, 40 million indirectly. Statist commie. Kike lover. 200 million white people are suffering in poverty because of his actions of implementing communism>RooseveltDirectly responsible for 5 million white deaths, 10 million indirectly. Statist commie. Kike lover. Suspended Gold standard listenting to his kike masters. Only reason the US is NOT a 100% controlled kikemunist state is he died before finishing his 4th term.>MussoliniSelf-proclaimed socialist/ communist. Hated the nobility. Brought in thousands of inferior sicilians to the north.>HitlerOnly killed 2 million kikes and 1 million jeets. So obssessed with killing kikes and jeets (objectively good) he is directly responsible for the death of ~20 million white people. Good objectives, evil execution. >Hirohito>Directly responsible for 30 million dead chinks and jeets>Maintained the power of the nobilityI rest my case.
>>18239923This
>>18238948Emperor Shōwa was a good man who cared about his people. Don't compare him to the tyrants in that picture
>>18238948>How would you rate these men from most to least evil?Stalin > Roosevelt > Hitler > Mussolini > HirohitoHitler and Mussolini could debatably be swapped perhaps. I don't think I know enough about the latter to say for sure.
>>18239063So the most evil is EBK Stalin, and the least evil is ineffectual Hirohito.
>>18239589If you call Mussolini incompetent evil then you must apply that same label to Hitler and Hirohito who both failed to control their empires contrary to as would be expected of a great leader.
>>18239750This take was brought to you by /leftypol/.
>>18238948>Personally I think Hitler was the most evil and Roosevelt was the least evilAmericanism is a disease. Enjoy your collapse.
>>18238948Stalin > Hiromoot > Hitler > Mussolini > Roosevelt (jewish puppet)
>>18238948>RooseveltThe most evil, no contest. He tricked America into a world war he wanted all along with that whole Pearl Harbor inside job thing, and then he forced everyone to use SOCIAL SECURITY like a total communist.>HirohitoPretty chill guy, just liked looking at marine biology stuff. His generals were the ones who got a bit rowdy. HOWEVER gets second-most-evil just because his country fought America (good guys).>MussoliniMade the trains run on time, you gotta respect that. Not that evil, just had a big ego and cool uniforms. More of a joke, really.>StalinMisunderstood. Yeah, he killed a bunch of his own people, but he also helped beat Hitler, so that's a point in his favor.>HitlerLeast evil. Sure, he did some not-great stuff, but he pulled Germany out of an economic depression and was a great public speaker. People focus way too much on the Holocaust, which was probably exaggerated anyway. He really loved his dog.
>>18239750>Hitler is easily the most evil for killing 6 million JewsHmmm, source?
>>18239755>>18239646Empire of Japan help Jewish too
>>18238958>>18238967>>18238954Stalin is a true neutral politically speaking, FDR is ordered evil.
>>18238948stalin > roosevelt > churchill = hitler >>> hirohito >>> mussolini
>>18239755What bad thing did Emperor Shōwa ever do?
>>18238948Stalin is objectively the worst
>>18243163Churchhill was worse then Roosevelt desu but the rest is spoton
>StalinPsychopath. To him, everyone was either an asset to be squeezed or a threat to be eliminated, and as time went on more and more people went from the 'asset' column to the 'threat' column.>RooseveltSociopath. His whole thing was, he wanted war with Germany. He had to operate within America's constitutional system, so he couldn't go to war with Germany immediately, but he spent two years (1939-1941) trying to incite Germany using threats, insults and unilateral military actions in the North Atlantic, and then when all of that failed he switched to inciting Japan, not because he wanted war with Japan but because he wanted Japan to call Germany to its aid.>HirohitoOpportunist, underrated in terms of personal agency. His apologists love to blame others for all the bad stuff Japan did, but when it looked like he would end up controlling Japan, China and Southeast Asia, he sure was happy to lend his aid to the pro-war faction. His only regret is that he lost, but even then he was able to 'Speer' his way out of trouble ("yeah, I did some bad stuff, but others made me do it and I'll be better from now on").>HitlerTrue believer in his own fantasies, who made a series of catastrophic choices and ended up dragging the war on much longer than it needed to because of his genuine but incorrect belief in the superiority of 'will' (which the Germans and Japanese had) to terrain, logistics and firepower (which the Allies had) in modern war.>MussoliniHad he not taken Hitler's side (and become known as Hitler's soft underbelly), he would have been remembered as just another shitty tinpot dictator whose only saving grace was that those who came after him were even more corrupt. Nevertheless, not very evil, just very bombastic and ineffective. A bit like Goering in that respect.
>>18240708>Directly responsible for 30 million white deaths, 40 million indirectly Love everytime a commmunist leader is mentioned people use a number randomizer and put millions afterLegit how did you reach those Numbers? How is Stalin a kike lover?
>>18244809In Hirohitos defence, it had been tradition for a thousand years for the Japanese emperor not to get involved in politics, and the Japanese constitution from the 1800s allowed the military to even have free reign over the state,Hirohito had divine mandate to in theory he could have had every politician and officer executed on the spot, but his greatest crime was simply to stand by tradition which wasnt inherently evil.Everything else is largely correct. Roosevelt wasnt evil but he wasnt good either. He played along US foreign interests and managed to frame it as USA acting on self defence and for the good of everyone (kinda like how USA does things today).I'd rank them from most evil to least evil:Stalin>Hitler>Roosevelt>Mussolini>HirohitoThere is a big jump between Hitler and Roosevelt. Both Stalin and Hitler were psychopaths, the other 3 were mostly just pragmatic evil, which is almost necessary in times of war.
>>18244921Hitler wasn't a psychopath. He was obsessive, but he cared a lot - if anything he cared too much about construction projects and state welfare state policies, which is why he made some of his biggest strategic mistakes, including being hesitant on fully militarizing the German economy in 1939-1942 (after which, even though German military-industrial output peaked in August 1944, it was far too late to make any difference).You can hear Hitler reflecting on this particular mistake in the secret recording of his meeting with Mannerheim in 1942, when the Eastern Front was starting to go the other way.>Today there is a tank plant [in the Soviet Union] where (...) a little more than 60,000 workers work, in a single tank plant. A gigantic factory. Masses of workers who live like beasts (...) Unbelievable (...) Only [effort/money spent] on arming themselves.
>>18244940What are you even talking about you austistic moron.Hitler was a evil because he killed based on ideological conviction, same as Stalin. They both wanted to achieve utopia and killed millions because it was seen as a justified means for the greater good. Both were completely indifferent to the suffering they caused because they were convinced that their cause was righteous.Yeah everyone who was around Hitler and who later wrote a testimony, such as Traudl Junge, described Hitler as a loving and caring fatherly figure who could never bring himself to do any harm against anyone in his immediate surrounding. Most evil people are very often extremely empathetic, and it's what leads to their self-righteousness to commit evil against their ideological opponents.Roosevelt also killed hundreds of thousands of civilians through bombing campaign but this was more of a 'pragmatic evil' for the war effort and achieve national interests in times of chaotic change, rather than ideological conviction. Neither Britain nor USA was out for blood when it was no longer necessary
