Why don't secular societies forbid usury?
Because the entire economy is based on it. Including your savings account and pension
>>18241411Usuary needs regulations because otherwise banks and savings & loans and other financial services quickly degenerate in criminal loansharks
>>18241417this makes economy sound like jewish psyop desu
>>18241425but banning it and public executions of those who practice it is also a form of regulation
>Why don't secular societies (((gibsme money 4 free)))?
>>18241411>retarded people need to be protected from the jooooooo
>>18241440Yeah, a little too extreme of a ban
>>18241411Why would you loan money without interest?Like if you lend me $500,000 to buy a house and I pay it back in installments over the next 30 years that total $500,000. Why would you do that?
>>18241534You wouldn't in this case obviously. Investments aren't usury though so I'm not sure where the line isI guess the problem are people who are just money lenders and make money out of a meme profession that undermines society
>>18241450>it's okay to financially exploit retarded people
>>18241417FPBP. At this point debt is money and money is debt. If you ended usury then congratulations, that's a global financial collapse that would make all previous financial crises in human history combined look like nothing. You'd probably kill more people than WW3.
>>18241770Sacrifices have to be made. We have a LOT of easily expendable excess population anyway.
>>18241770all those people will die anyway sooner or later, it would totally be worth it
>>18241411Your question should be>Why don't secular capitalist societies forbid usury?Usury is banned in all communist countries, which are secular.
People make it seem like you cant survive without modern economic system North korea does just fine wuthout usury
>>18241806go live in north korea then
>>18241438because it is
>>18241806>state entirely propped up by China>doing fine
>>18241417The 'usury' part is that networks of debt are kept in place so people can make money on the interest. If they were rationalized, the people would still have access to credit and debt, and bankers would still make huge amounts of money, it just wouldn't be enough money for them to control the entire society.
Brainlets and midwits fail to understand credit
>>18241541Investments are usury. How are they not? I give you money and in return you give me the money back plus an agreed upon extra amount per year l.
>>18241411Finance just wouldn't work without interest. In fact, Medieval European societies allowed interest and similar financial practices. And not just because of Jews. A catholic institution, the Knights Templar, pioneered many modern banking practices, actually.Idk why people zero in on banking as the Jewish profession, when technically they played all sorts of expert and merchantile roles in medieval Europe. So did Muslims, curiously. At least in areas where muslims could be found (Spain, Sicily for a time, Hungary). >>18241541Usury is all interest.
>>18241411Because "Stupid people are too dumb to understand this so we should ban it" is not a valid argument against any aspect of society. In a just society people that can't handle usury without bankrupting their family would simply be a worked to death as third class citizens. Be thankful that is not the case and accept the necessity of usury for grown up society.
>>18242584Another thing they did very famously which peasants hated them for was Tavern Keeping, in poland famously. Admittedly in this case Jews were only complicit. The owners of the distilleries were the polish nobility, who often made consumption of vodka compulsory. This Vodka was also of very low quality because the nobles often had monopolies on alcohol production.
>>18241417>>18241450>>18241770What a jewish thread.
>>18242604Have you closed your savings and retirement accounts and put that money in your mattress?
>>18242613A real (((Banker))) hater would put all that money into bouillion.
