what would you think of someone that follows these philosophical positions?gnostic atheism - positive belief that there is no godphysicalism - that everything is made out of physical matterpresentism/a-theory of time - that only the present exists and past/future does notcausal determinism - that everything is determined due to cause and effect since the big banghard determinism - that free will is not compatible with determinism and isnt realfatalism - that humans cant change fate due to inevitabilityontological realism - that a mind-independent reality existsmoderate realism - the view that universals/forms exist in the universe without the need of a separate realm like in platonismmathematical realism - the view that mathematical truths exist mind-independentlyscientific anti-realism - the view that scientific theories dont fully describe reality empiricism - the view that all knowledge comes from sense datacorrespondence theory of truth - statements are only truthful if they correspond to realitycausal tracking reliabilism - a belief is justified if it comes from a truth producing mechanism and if its caused by actual factepistemological realism - that mind-independent facts/knowledge existsmetaphysical realism - the view that a objective reality exists outside of our mindsnaive realist disjunctivism - the view that we directly perceive the world as it truly is and our senses giving us access to objects and their properties like colorrealist color primitivism - the view that color exists mind-independentlyaesthetic realism - the view that there are mind-independent aesthetic factsgastronomic realism - the view that flavor is mind-independent and objectivemoral realism - the view that there are mind-independent moral factsnegative consequentialism - the view that suffering takes precedence over pleasureobjective naturalism - the view that there is an objective meaning of lifelegal non-positivism - the view that law should include morality
>>18241627>you thinkA bit generous, you think?
>>18241641or at least what /his/torians would say about these positions
I would think he's a redditor
>>18241738but redditors are moral relativist, nihilist nominalists
isn't good place for this discution. 4chan like short posts. try on redit
