[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 700x450_Pilot_14741.jpg (53 KB, 700x488)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
Is it valid, and licit, for Christians to overthrow and subvert governments that get in the way of the Church's mission?

The Jesuits specialized in this sort of thing before they were suppressed. It got the Catholic Church into quite a lot of trouble. But did they have a point? If a political entity makes itself an obstacle to the preaching of the Gospel and the conversion of souls to Christ, isn't there an argument to be made that that entity has got to go? Even if it's the government of a nation-state?
>>
YES.

IT IS NOT ONLY LICIT, BUT, ALSO, IMPERATIVE.
>>
>>18242442
Cumgenio provee justificaciones de la Ley de reforma y la supresión de la iglesia.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.