Sub-Saharan Africa has more genetic diversity than indigenous Eurasia and Americas combined."Asian" is also a vague and confusing term of a large landmass; North Americans think of Chinese and Japanese, whereas Brits think of Indians and Pakistanis. You're going to tell me they belong in the exact same classification of ethnicity? Where does the line blur once we reach the boundaries of Central and Western Asia?And don't even get me started on "whiteness," which is the most arbitrary concept of all whose definition is what I make it to be. All this debate about whether Spaniards are white nor not, but it used to exclude anyone who isn't a firm Anglo/Dutch/North German Protestant (Uncle Ben went as far to label Swedes as "swarthy"). Eventually it includes all Europeans, but the European Greeks don't look too different from the Asian Turks, so we expand the boundaries so far that it includes Somalis? Did the classification only change because Anglos want to "we wuz" Ancient Greece and Egypt? Most "white" people don't even have white skin, or necessarily any lighter than East Asians or albinos from East Africa or whatnot. The Irish can be pale as heck, yet historically they weren't considered "white." The boundary is meaningless too; you can easily find "German"-looking people in Afghanistan and North Pakistan, and also "Arab"-looking native people in Wales and England (see Rowan Atkinson).And finally, where do mixed race people lie here? People have been mutting since the beginning of time; "pure" ethnicities hardly exist.
>>18244115Ethnicity is mostly social, race is not.
>>18244115>Race classification is nothing more than a social construct>Sub-Saharan Africa has more genetic diversity than indigenous Eurasia and Americas combined.>No genetic data to compare
>>18244117Race isn't real. It's 100% social.
>>18244115>mountains/summits do not exist because there are valleys attached to it and where do you draw the lineGo back to plebbit, you faggot.
>>18244343Your skin color is tied to radiation resistance which is 100% real. If you want to test it go get a tan and see for yourself.
>>18244115nationality is not racenationality is a social constructrace is a biological reality, for example two whites can not have a black child and two blacks can not have a white childpic related is a helpful visualization of the relative genetic distance between the people from various places
>>182443642 whites can have a black child though. Research Sandra Laing
>>18244382>2 whites can have a black childThey literally can not. It is as impossible as two wolves having a fox.
>>18244115>Sub-Saharan Africa has more genetic diversity than indigenous Eurasia and Americas combined.yes, because various sub-saharan african groups never made contact with each otherit's not rocket science
>>18244393There was a literal case in South Africa about this. Sandra Laing
>>18244115>There are no dog breeds, they are all dogs anyway, and there are mixed breeds, therefore breeds don't exist
>>18244446kek nice b8 m8
>>18244446If you can't tell that isn't his daughter then you are retarded.
>>18244115Sorry, but genetic studies gave us this >>18244364 so everything you said has been proven wrong. Human subspecies are a thing based on actual genetic clusters, not just arbitrary concepts like phenotype or geography. Other animals are classified as subspecies despite being closer genetically than humans are. It is proven that human subspecies align with what was known as human races in the common knowledge.
>>18244115>The Irish can be pale as heck, yet historically they weren't considered "white." The boundary is meaningless too;What utter shite. No one has ever "considered" the Irish not to be white. Fuck off with your jewish lies.
>>18244115let me guess you're American or Latin American
>>18244364>PCA'salso a social construct they are completely arbitrary
