Christianity worked great until they dropped the part about whites collectively being the body of the one true living God upon the earth to rule all of creation forever. Whites collectively, as the body of Christ, subjugated the earth in the Son's name, and that included enslaving the non white and the slaughter of any who opposed the rule of Heaven. Islam was created for those left out of the salvation of the light, so that instead of being destroyed the dark might be led to worship the light of God. Today Muslims instead worship a cube and no longer recognize the God that they're meant to serve. All who oppose the rule of the one true God are subject to death, because they seek to interfere with the salvation of the light. Love of ones enemies does not preclude the possibility that their death is required. Those who fail to submit are guilty and there is no condemnation from heaven for their destruction. It is because of love that such enemies should be afforded the option to worship the one true living God instead of being summarily slaughtered as they surely all deserve.
>>18246574>Christianity worked great until they dropped the part about whites collectively being the body of the one true living God upon the earth to rule all of creation forever.When was that ever a part of Christianity? Got any verses you can cite?
>>18246580>When was that ever a part of Christianity?I'm really tired of you brainwashed chuckle fucks spouting off about Oceania, Eurasia, and Eastasia having always been at war.>Got any verses you can cite?You can start with 1 John 1:5 and 1 Corinthians 12:27.
>>18246586Galatians 3:28
>>18246612>you are all one in Christwritten to Galatians, who were whitenot "everybody is one in Christ"it says "you (Galatians) are all one in Christ"I understand you may be ESL and so that distinction was hard for you to pick up on. Also, 1 John 1:5 still applies, if you aren't white you aren't a part of God.
>>18246615>written to Galatians, It's directed to all Christians. Is the epistle to the Romans directed at Romans only, who were definitely not all white?> Galatians were white.Source VERY much needed.who were white
>>18246574>>18246615You know that black people are mentioned in the Bible, right?>And he rose and went. And there was an Ethiopian, a eunuch, a court official of Candace, queen of the Ethiopians, who was in charge of all her treasure. He had come to Jerusalem to worshipActs 8:27
>>18246619>lyingjust stop, you are full of shit and it is beyond tiresome
>>18246625>implying everyone from Ethiopia was a blackmodern racial demographics ≠ modern racial demographics
>>18246642>Ethiopians were white back then!
>>18246644150 years ago you would have been laughed at for saying that a black man could be French or British. Racial demographics have changed dramatically on the southwest shore of the Red Sea in the last two-thousand years.
>>18246652>150 years agoThat's 1875, there certainly were black French and British people back then.>Racial demographics have changed dramatically Then what's your evidence that Ethiopians were white in Biblical times?
>>18246656There certainly may have been a small handful of blacks in france or britain back then, but it is unlikely they would have been considered "french" or "british". As for evidence for the existence of whites south of the Sahara, that is plentiful. There is genetic evidence from the mass migration of whites into those lands about 5k years ago when they colonized around the lake Chad region. There are the historical accounts from people like Pliny the Elder, Pomponius Mela, Ptolemy and Orosius who refered to what they called white ethiopians that inhabited those regions before presumably being race mixed out of existence. You can also refer, if you want, to the first Christian king of what is now Ethiopia, a man called Ezana who was white.
>>18246677>There certainly may have been a small handful of blacks in france or britain back then, but it is unlikely they would have been considered "french" or "british".So? They were French and British.>As for evidence for the existence of whites south of the Sahara, that is plentiful.I said Ethiopia, specifically, don't expand this to mean all of the fucking Sahara, nobody mentioned the Sahara, we're talking about Ethiopia in Biblical times.
>>18246682>They were French and British.I don't personally consider any non white capable of being either french or british, because the non white aren't really either of those things.>>18246682>Ethiopia in Biblical timeswould have had white people, for example the first Christian king of what is now Ethiopia was a white man.
>>18246690>I don't personally considerWho cares what you consider? They were French and British.>would have had white people, for example the first Christian king of what is now Ethiopia was a white man.source?
>>18246714dumbass
>>18246644Ethiopia in the Bible does not refer to the modern borders of the country called Ethiopia today. It included areas like Yemen, where the city Saba existed. The queen of Sheba was from biblical Ethiopia/Yemen.And people down there in southern Arabia are more tanned due to higher levels of sun exposure. That doesn't mean they were negroes.
>>18246677>There is genetic evidence from the mass migration of whites into those lands about 5k years ago when they colonized around the lake Chad region
>>18247580They're described as having a different skin color from Israel. Jeremiah 13:23Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil.
>>18248438Yes anon. Read the second paragraph of the post you just responded to.
>>18246574>>18246615>>18246635>>18246723Christogenea shill thread
>>18246615>>18246586>>18246574>>18246635You're schizophrenic. There is nothing white about this piece of shit desert death cult. It was written by jews for jews in a jew land.
>>18248439They're described as being tall and hairless ("peeled") in another chapter. It's more than skintone.
>>18248446not sure what your homosexual fed honeypot has to do with this thread but I hope nobody is retarded enough to take your bait
>>18248450Whites collectively, as the body of Christ, subjugated the earth in the Son's name, and that included enslaving the non white and the slaughter of any who opposed the rule of Heaven.
