Historically from an effective ethics standpoint is it more effective to kill military generals/scientists/intelligence or kill the hard to replace, civilian professors at the top of fields that could be used for war, even if the scientists themselves are not directly contributing to their countries military?
>>18248382>from an effective ethics standpoint is it more effectiveWhat does this question have to do with ethics?
Actually, the ultimate 5D chess move is to kill neither.Instead, you infiltrate and subvert the pedagogy... the textbooks, curricula, and fundamental paradigms taught to undergraduates for 20 years. You poison the well of knowledge itself.A generation later, the entire intellectual ecosystem of the enemy is built on faulty axioms and crippled methodologies. Their top professors are now high-IQ useless idiots, teaching their own successors to be even more wrong.
>>18248398clickbait headline
>>18248394the countries are not a war yet so it could prevent millions of deaths
