[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why were the irish the only european country to develop its own caste of untouchables? Or preserve it if it was an aryian thing
>>
File: les cagots.jpg (185 KB, 760x790)
185 KB
185 KB JPG
>>18249496
Ahem.
>>
>>18249496
Irish as a whole are untouchables.
>>
>>18249551
The irish and the southwest french then
>>
The pagan Scandinavian Thrall/ slave class feels a bit like an untouchable class. Iron Age Germanics really seemed to perceive nobility and peasants as being different races entirely, and certain sources tend to describe Thralls as being stupid and ugly. That being said, they aren’t properly an untouchable class because slaves working on land was the pinnacle of productive infrastructure for like all of history until the Industrial Revolution. They were an extremely important facet of society. Having an entire group of people that you literally can’t touch feels like an autistic pajeet addition
>>
>>18249496
Travellers were never a caste or "untouchables".



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.