Can you honestly defend it 100% ? Even the parts where Israelites just kill everyone not sparing anyone on Gods order?
>>18249604There's nothing to defend. God said it therefore it is right. A 1st grader could understand that; Why can't you? Tumor flaring up?
>>18249610>this shit for brained moron is still postingYou utterly lost
>>18249604It's fascinatingly compact. The Torah section, particularly Numbers, is actually the best part.
>>18249615https://aicentral.substack.com/p/improving-science-modelsTick tock.
>>18249604Yes. The first reply you received might be shit quality but it more or less expresses the perspective you're asking about. You don't have enough information to judge God and him being God means he gets to not only know what's the best action, he even gets to dictate it like he got to dictate the shape of reality in general.
>>18249610Your “god” Yahweh is not a real god like Zeus is.Your “god” Yahweh is Typhon, the embodiment of chaos and father of all monsters.The bible itself proves this>It claims Yahweh will try to destroy this world (Book of Revelation)>It claims Yahweh is jealous of other gods (Deuteronomy 4:24 and Joshua 24:19)>It claims Yahweh is the “destroyer of nations” (Jeremiah 4:7)There's also the fact that Chaeremon, Apion, and Manetho all linked Yahweh to Set, the Egyptian god of chaos, destruction, and foreigners, whom later Egyptians equated with Typhon.You accuse the Olympians of being “demons,” but the reality is that the only "demon" here is Yahweh whom you worship.This is why your “god” forbids images of him, because he looks like this.
>>18249610>God said it therefore it is right.Nonsequitur.
>>18249610>>18249631>It claims Yahweh is the “destroyer of nations” (Jeremiah 4:7)I should also mention that the phrase “destroyer of nations” is translated from the Hebrew phrase mashkhít goyím (משחית גוים) and in some versions of the Bible, this phrase is translated as “destroyer of gentiles.” They are literally calling him the “destroyer of goyim,” this only proves that Yahweh-Typhon is a demon.
>>18249632:D
>>18249624>morons who can't do basic math think they've refuted directly proved and observed phenomena using ClaudeVoxday is utterly braindead, he's been corrected on this over and over and like you, he can not learn. You both have worthless brains.
>>18249637xD You're really dumb. Have fun burning!
>>18249604You don't get to judge God. What would be evil for us to do is not sol when God does it. This a very simple concept.
>>18249643Literally every single one of the posters in that link of yours are ~110IQ morons without even a basic understanding of math or genetics. A bunch of low IQ subhuman Christians gathering around a little blog to pretend that they can do math that they can't, thinking they've overturned reality for their shitty fairytale book. It's pathetic. The math has already been proved and the fixation rates confirmed empirically with modern GWAS studies. You losers lost.
>>18249633>It claims Yahweh is the “destroyer of nations”It was calling an invading conqueror the destroyer, not Yahweh. This is what happens when you don't proofread the script you keep using. Also, "destroyer of gentiles" isn't even the right meaning, goyim before its later usage means "nations".
>>18249668
>>18249691You lost
>>18249698Lost what
>>18249700Young earth creationism is not true
>>18249710It is. Read the Bible.
>>18249715The bible is wrong and it is not the word of God.>"e-enjoy b-burning"You lost.
>>18249719>Year after losing>Gaytheist is still having a meltdown>Meantime I'm looking at a second promotion in one year's time and just got halfway done with my master's degreeI'm not tired of winning yet! I want MOAR!!! xD
>>18249726You lost a year ago and you still post your stupid shit. Your brain is worthless.The age of the earth isn't even biology, it's chemistry and geology. You retards don't know a single thing about reality.
>>18249726Pride before the fall. Have fun burning
>>18249736>Have fun burningYou seem confused. Are you stupid? :o
>>18249739You are very stupid.
>>18249719The Bible is the word of God. I will pray for you.
>>18249744No, it's not. You're braindead.
>>18249746What happened to your AI images? Those were mad funny.
>>18249752What images
>>18249756The heads in cages.
>>18249757That's happening soon.
>>18249758>non-sequiturYa isn't two gud at thinkin' is ya?
>>18249761You're utterly retarded
>>18249741Tick tock ;)
>>18249770*yawn*You lost
>>18249624So to give an actual disproof of this retards nonsense:What he's doing here is trying to add 2 undefined parameters to the standard logistic growth equation for the sweep of a beneficial allele. That equation is t_fix = (2/s)ln(2N).His modification of this equation adds two parameters d and s_max. d and s_max are not derived from anything, they are arbitrarily made up variables that he just made up and added to the logistic growth equation of a beneficial allele. Therefore, no implications can follow from this, despite what he says, because these variables are not defined and are not derived from anything empirical or mathematical. If you are modeling overlapping generations, that is already handled by converting between years and generations using a measured generation interval. You don’t introduce an made up drag factor d without a derivation. Population genetics already handles these things, you guys just literally don't know what you're talking about. The logistic growth equation never has an unbounded s, so the s_max is completely redundant. Overall, it is another example of you all not understanding what the math or equations are saying, similar to how you thought that the generations for a neutral allele to fix means that you need to wait sequentially for a neutral allele to fix, misunderstanding that alleles fix in parallel. You are mixing up the equation for the sweep of a beneficial allele with the drift of a neutral mutation. You quite literally do not understand what you're modeling or what your own argument even is. You are very, very confused.
>>18249624>>18250977The Wright-Fischer model is a null hypothesis. Models already factor in differential reproduction and overlapping generations. The argument that you're making is that overlap between generational reproduction or differential reproduction would somehow cause fixation to occur more slowly, what you call "drag". First of all as has been stated, the logistic equation for the fixation of a beneficial allele has nothing to do with the fixation of a neutral mutation, so it's not even relevant with respect to the theorem that the fixation rate k is equal to the mutation rate u. Secondly, overlapping generations do not create a new bottleneck for the rate of fixations of neutral alleles, and beneficial alleles still fix faster than neutral ones. This here is really shows that you all have no idea what you're talking about: You are mixing up models for the sweep of a beneficial allele vs. the drift of a neutral mutation, and you continue to have this extremely stupid idea that one fixation happens, then you have to wait n generations before another one happens, then you have to wait again, etc., in a sequential fashion, when in reality alleles move in parallel.The logistic growth of a beneficial allele fixes faster than a neutral mutation under drift, because beneficial alleles have greater-than-neutral fitness. The logistic equation already shows how beneficial alleles fix faster than neutral ones. It's actually flabbergasting how you guys talk so confidently when you display a complete lack of understanding of everything that you're talking about, and you're confused about your own argument. You've mixing up two equations that model different things and somehow are thinking they're related. You've basically just added two made up variables d and s_max and added them to the logistic growth of a beneficial allele equation to use it to argue about neutral mutations which it doesn't even describe.
>>18249604Yes
>>18249604>Even the parts where Israelites just kill everyone not sparing anyone on Gods order?No one had a problem with God attacking human-sacrifice cultures (and this is the reason, stated repeatedly in the texts) before feminism and Roe. You don't see Victorians or medievals agonizing over Muh Poor Molech Worshippers. It's because people now empathize with the killers rather than the victims. I'm seeing Aztec rehab and "maybe Carthage wasn't all that bad" at the same time and let's not pretend we don't know what it's about.
>>18249604>Can you honestly defend it 100% ?Easy. It's almost completely fictional. There's so little to actually defend. So much of it is written way after the fact, to write down their stories, as they get fucked up by Babylon.>Even the parts where Israelites just kill everyone not sparing anyone on Gods order?It's fiction.Now if you wanted an answer from someone who believes, they're just going to define their god as good, so anything the god says is good. Even the things that are bad. Or they'll twist the meanings of everything to mean the opposite. Or say that some word is unclear so we can't be sure if it was a command to murder everyone.
>>18249604There’s no part where the Israelites do anything like that. The text was written by Israelites themselves, so self-slander wouldn’t make any sense
>>18251908It's not slander. They're people from the Bronze Age. They thought those things were fine.
>>18251802There was never anything wrong with human sacrifice, you have a puritan morality.
>>18251921We've had homo marriage since Obama and there are already nine-year-old drag queens and sons of divorcees getting gelded by their mothers because they wanted one twin of each gender and possible revenge. (James/Luna's mother is the only person in history who really does deserve to be a Mengele test subject. Assuming his stuff even happened.) The old religions warning us about this stuff is at minimum "they observed a bad social trend and told us to avoid it"
>>18251921Army of lovers doesn't need to mean gay buttsecks.
>>18252086Jesus spoke fondly of eunuchs thoughbeit
>>18249604the christian dilemma: not wanting to admit that ancient israelites were the same evil semites that modern jews are while trying to defend all thr jewish bullshit the old testament figures did
>>18251802The Aztec (by which I assume you mean the Mexica of Tenochtitlan) were militaristic conquerors who did large scale religious killings, but that can be said of a number of major civilizations and military powers across history.The Aztec "weren't all that bad" in the sense that they aren't UNIQUELY bad (especially considering their rule of conquered states was pretty loose and hands off), and popular understanding/culture tends to turn them into primitive savages who do nothing but violent orgies where tens of thousands of people, when actual archeological evidence of their sacrifices suggests scales of sacrifice a fraction of that size (though a fraction of tens of thousands is still a few hundred or a few thousand people a year), and when even the literal Conquistadors and Missionaries, Friars etc who colonized them praised their cities, art, intellectualism, governance, social order and systems of law etc as being worth respecting and learning about, see pic
>>18249604God's actions are in no need of any defense. God decides when people live and when they die. We are not entitled to life.Cope.
>>18253414>The Aztec "weren't all that bad" in the sense that they aren't UNIQUELY badThey would flay women and wear their skins while masturbating and demanding female pronouns for Ochpaniztli. Explain to me how this helps militarily. I don't recall Patton or Julius Caesar doing this. Were they doing it wrong?
>>18252205He was talking about enforced celibacy in the context which goes with His warnings about adultery and lust.Modern troonery is powered by extreme lust (they're all porn addicts) and is basically the opposite. >throughoutOne or maybe two mentions; it wasn't a big thing with Him.
>>18249604>18253424>Can you honestly defend it 100%Yes, thanks for aksing
>>18251802>lets combat child sacrifice by raping, torturing and murdering the same children The Israelites were shit people. By the end of the OT, the understanding of God is radically different from the time of Moses.God didn't change. The people did.
>>18254042I am legitimately curious where the hell you heard about masturbation as part of the rituals for Ochpaniztili, because as far as I know no such thing happened.You're correct that there was a male deity impersonator of Toci, a goddess, and that also involved wearing flayed skins, but actual sex never occurred as far as I am aware. If you can find a reputable source that says otherwise I'd love to see it.Men portraying female deities or historical figures was also absolutely something other cultures did, and I can find all sorts of gruesome examples of religious killings from other cultures to. Maybe you could say the Mexica had a knack for doing it in particularly and uniquely flashy ways, but the actual practices of religious murder and the scales at which it occurred at weren't unique, even if the Mexica were high up in the runnings.Actually, to be fair, I'd grant you that the Mexica were unique in the scales of REGULAR religious killings, EX: on an annual basis, since they probably sacrificed a few hundred to a few thousand people a year, and nobody else was doing that much religious killings annually... but on the flip side, you have religious was in Eurasia like the Cathar Purge or the Thirty Years War that killed tens to hundreds of thousands or even millions within a few decades, and would match a full century or more of Mexica sacrifices at once.
>copy pasted gilgamesh>this just doesn't matter apparentlySo did God reveal himself to sumerians first or was he just using them as a test run?
>>18249604Bible is not God’s direct word, it’s a divinely inspired text written by different Hebrews with their own cultural contexts playing a huge part. Bible is an epic saga, the flood the wars and everything is epic exaggeration and hyperbole. Also keep in mind for a Christian what matters is the new covenant, the old covenant that presumably made hebrews do such stuff is broken. Maybe because they were not supposed to do all that horrible stuff. TldrThe OT is not very relevant.
