[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
Is the King James Version misl(...) 12/22/25(Mon)17:31:07 No.18249648
File: IMG_4045.jpg (370 KB, 1320x1868)
370 KB
370 KB JPG
Is the King James Version misleading? Anonymous 12/22/25(Mon)17:31:07 No.18249648 Archived
>>
Anonymous
12/22/25(Mon)17:32:37 No.18249654
Anonymous 12/22/25(Mon)17:32:37 No.18249654
>>18249648
No.
>>
Anonymous
12/22/25(Mon)19:00:28 No.18249864
Anonymous 12/22/25(Mon)19:00:28 No.18249864
>>18249648
This could be explained by "literal" interpretations of words not uncommonly missing the mark on meaning.

Look at "missing the mark". If you translated that literally into another language, it would seem to say something different than you, a fellow speaker of English, knows what it in fact means.
>>
Anonymous
12/22/25(Mon)19:17:25 No.18249899
Anonymous 12/22/25(Mon)19:17:25 No.18249899
>>18249648
only the illiterate complain about KJV
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.