On December 25, 274, Aurelian, after unifying the Roman Empire, instituted Roman monotheism under the god Sol.The other gods were relegated to mere saints focused on practical causes, such as the saint of marriage (Eros) and the saint of metalworkers (Hephaestus).Later, the only thing Flavius Constantinus and Flavius Theodosius did was replace the god Sol (Sol was the god's name) with Jesus, who had been created by his family during the time of Flavius Vespasianus and Flavius Titus.And, over time, the names of the saints were changed from pagan names to Catholic names.Until the 4th century, Christianity was merely a game played by the Roman elite, who controlled writing in the Empire. Only a small elite had full literacy, money to buy writing materials, and the right to produce and reproduce texts in the empire without being killed.The much-talked-about persecution of Christians was nothing more than conflicts between the elite who wanted to adopt Christianity as the state belief and the elite who opposed it.There is NOT A SINGLE ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE of the existence of early Christian groups in the first two centuries. Nothing. Zero.We have some texts from the 2nd century written by members of the elite allied with the Flavian family, the elite who destroyed Jerusalem. Many of these texts were written using false names and based on lies and propaganda.THERE IS NOT A SINGLE ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF EARLY CHRISTIAN GROUPS IN THE FIRST TWO CENTURIES. NOTHING. ZERO. NIENTE
YAWNyeah whatever ok but did you look at Carotta’s theory like I told you to? This is not entertaining at all, you need to graduate to wackier shit
>>18249853Based
>>18249853You mean the first century? In the second century we are starting to find things like the Catacombs of Domitilla and arguably Alexamenos graffito at the tail end.
>>18249853>There is NOT A SINGLE ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE of the existence of early Christian groups in the first two centuries. Nothing. Zero.What is your definition of archaeological evidence?
>>18249853I mean yeah, first two centuries AD christianity was the obscure cult of Yeshu
Christianity is simply one big forgery from beginning to end.Or, speaking more intellectually, it was crafted by the Elite who understood its esoteric truths, and they relayed the literal interpretation to plebeians to keep them in line.
>speaking more intellectually
>>18251243You mad? Jesus Christ never existed. It was to keep plebs like you in line because you are an overly emotional and evil flesh being (cattle).
>>18251249Why would I be mad over conspiracy theories? I was just amused you think they're intellectual.>inb4 elites created the term "conspiracy theory" to suppress truth!!
>>18249853Why were there Christian communities in Armenia founded by a Parthian noble?
>>18251252Conspiracy theory?LMFAO.It doesn't matter how much evidence Mythicists bring to retards like you.The mountain of Christian texts cemented in your mind and the aura of Christ confuse retards like you into believing that there must be some singular figure behind the concept.Anyone who looks into this realises very quickly, that not only did the very basic tales never happen or were exaggerated, but that the figure himself was a fabrication from the beginning.
>>18251268>Roman elites conspired >LMFAO a conspiracy theory? how??Ok
>>18251271Constantine embracing Christianity and making it the state religion across a vast empire is indeed a conspiracy because you have zero evidence he believed 100% of Christian doctrine.Thus, we can conclude, that there is a degree to which the embracing of Christianity by the chief ruler of the state was partially political in nature.So yes, that is the definition of a conspiracy, Constantine conspired with Christians.
>>18251274>you have zero evidence he believed 100% of Christian doctrineWe have zero evidence of this for most Christians who have ever lived. You're being dishonest.>we can conclude... was partially political in nature.If we want to commit an argument from silence fallacy, we certrainly can.>so yes, that is the definition of a conspiracyGot him.
>>18251276Do you reject that Constantine partially supported Christianity for political reasons?
>>18251279I reject the logical fallacy.
>>18251253You can't answer this because it doesn't fit your retarded theory. Did you even know that Armenian became Christian before Constantine even became emperor? Did you know that it was a Parthian noble that is responsible for it?
>>18251280...
>>18250959There's first century stuff too. He's just ignoring it because it doesn't fit what his masters told him to spam. Just sage it, report it and move on.
>>18251326There's nothing from the 1st century LMFAO.Please post one example, thank you.
>>18251347We didn't find artifacts which means their culture was mostly sung. What's the matter, you don't like arguments from silence?
>>18249853>who had been created by his family during the time of Flavius Vespasianus and Flavius Titus.There was no relationship, Flavius was basically just a title in late antiquity.
>>18249853>Christmas is pagan Oops!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uU8e-pDqYQ
>>18251347The ossuary inscriptions are what I posted last time, just go back to your last spam thread for the details. There's further if you keep records.
>>18251966AHAHAHAHAHHAThe ossuary is not even ACCEPTED as the place of ChristAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
>>18251292Still no answer OP?
HER NAME PLEASE
>>18249853What evidence would you find convincing?
>>18252636AI Sloppenstein
>>18252803No...
