But it will never "win" because the idea that there's no God makes people feel uneasy.A great example is the popularity of the moral argument for the existence of God. The argument is basically:P1: If God didn't exist, there would be upsetting consequences.P2: I don't want that.C: God exists.I've also heard people say things such as "Christianity must be true because otherwise there can't be salvation". As I'm sure you've noticed, this implicitly has the same argument structure.
It's a Biblically-approved argument structure thoughbeit.
You don't win because that's a fucking trilby!
>>18250196Most humans do not want the truth. They want what makes them feel comfortable. And that's not necessarily bad... if humans only cared about the truth, they'd be like robots. But we are emotional beings.
>>18250196>But it will never "win" because the idea that there's no God makes people feel uneasy.The only reason you're an "atheist" is because the idea of a just God judging you and sending you to hell for all eternity makes you uncomfortable.
>>18250196It’s not that atheism won't win, it’s that humans *can't afford* for it to win.
>there's no god xd>U will burnWhen did you get tired of these two? Gentlemen: Tonight we burn in Hell on purpose! Accept Darkness and believe in Hell, and you shall come. Fuck these faggots, I'll jump in.
>>18250196>MFW your entire argument is sky daddy real cuz sad if notConsequences aren't evidence, cope harder. By that logic I can prove anything I'm afraid of is false. Absolute state of presuppositionalists.
>>18250441Christians always try to flip it like that but it simply doesn't work. If I believed God exists, I could just sign up for the free gift of salvation and enjoy heaven forever and ever.
>>18250441>judgingI thought the jew died for our sins?
>>18250441if atheists thought they'd be judged by a god, they wouldn't be atheists, retard
