He's one of the emperors most responsible for Rome's fall desu, even if on a personal level he wasn't the most incompetent.
>>18251212He had a grand idea, that was actually working in practice. Maybe if he had 20 years it would have been successful.
>>18251212Julian was only emperor for two years and died unexpectedly. So of course his reforms wouldn’t last a while or have long-term effects. If he reigned for say 20 or 30 years, I think the Christianization of Rome could be reverted.
>>18251212Stfu cuckstian pleb scum.
>>18251223>died unexpectedlyHis Persian campaign was completely unnecessary and very poorly executed. And remember he only died because he was prancing around the frontlines unarmored to inspire the troops. It's inexcusable, his little stunt was the end of the empire's post-Diocletian upswing. And ironically his reign only accelerated the Christian takeover, because it now looked to everyone that God had punished him and the empire for this apostasy.
