[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: labour share.jpg (105 KB, 740x560)
105 KB
105 KB JPG
Why do Marxists believe that capitalists take the lion's share of profits if most profit goes to workers as wages? Was it different in the past, and if so, when did it change? Did the world become socialist without anyone noticing?
>>
>>18254295
>if most profit goes to workers as wages?
If it did then there would be no billionaires
>>
>>18254310
Billioners work billion times harder.
>>
>>18254313
Smarter maybe, but not harder
>>
wages are costs, not reinvested profits, retard
>>
>>18254313
0/10 rage bait little bro



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.