Can't I believe in historical materialism without any of the dialectic magic?
>>18254312No. The dialectic is the central element in it. This is what Hegelianism is all about.
>>18254329A right answer and a wrong answer don't combine to make a half roght answer.
>>18254312That's liberal tech determinism.Without dialectics it's just >technology goes brrr then politics changes.
>>18254421>technology goes brrr then politics changes.This is unironically true though.
>>18254439Never post again.
>>18254399Thesis and anti-thesis aren't equivalent to right and wrong, dummy. Thesis is an initial proposition, the anti-thesis is an opposition to it. The Synthesis results from the resolution of that opposition.
>>18254499A thesis that is true and an antithesis that is not true don't synthesize into a half-truth.The thesis BTFO the antithesis.
>>18254714If you insist on the oversimplified example- the truth becomes a greater truth by understanding it's relation to the falsehood. So yes, it's not a half-truth.
>>18254714Is the Bourgeoise 'true' and the proletariat 'not true'?
>>18255327A prole can be classed as a bourgeoisie.
>>18254312next time someone wants to talk to you about dialectical materialism you should point out that dog spelled backwards is god
