[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1741535260375648.png (1.05 MB, 736x704)
1.05 MB
1.05 MB PNG
Priscus Attalus would've saved Rome, the sack of 410 could've been a rebirth like the sack of 387 BC.
>>
elaborate
>>
Stilicho was the greatest Roman general since at least Aurelian and even he couldn’t save it. What makes you think Attalus could? Shit was well and truely fucked by that point
>>
>>18255475
>>18255480
He would've started the reversal of the Empire's christianization because he was pagan.
>>
>>18255533
>Put in power by the Arian Visigoths
>Litterally had to convert in exchange of the nomination
Doubt



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.