Can the work of Otto Dix and similar artists truly be considered art? His creations are demoralizing and ugly, which is contrary to what art should be.
>>18257873I think youre just stupid and things like abstract art are irritating to stupid people
>>18257892I'm okay with abstract art if it depict beautiful things like pleasant geometric patterns.
>>18257873Was he Jewish? Their art tends to be creepy and ugly. You can tell at a glance.
>demoralized by a paintingYou're getting the black triangle.
>>18257873>is contrary to what art should be.Art's objetive is to express thoughts and emotions and the artist can express negative thoughts and emotions too.
>>18258062No. Art should be sublime and uplift people. Negative emotions are degenerate.
>>18258070Negative emotions are part of human nature. So no paintings of sad things? Then half of the paintings wouldn't exist.
>>18257873>Can the work of Otto Dix and similar artists truly be considered art? That you even ask this question makes me wonder if anything you consider art deserve being classed as such.
>>18258079If it were up to you, everything would be state sponsored art pompier directed towards promoting 'good values'. You shriveled little bureaucrat you.
>>18258070This painting depicts negative emotions so it must be degenerate.
>>18257905It can look nice, but I don't really see why should they be paintings in a museum. I wouldn't mind having a sweater or a mug with this pattern, but if I go to a gallery to look at paintings, I would like them to represent something like people, an event, a place etc. Similarly, I wouldn't want to wear a sweater with a print of a renaissance painting. I guess these abstract paintings also work in offices where you don't want people to get too distracted.
>>18257873The main problem the Nazis and their modern counterparts have with art like this is that it depicts distorted human figures. The Nazis were obsessed with phisical health and said that art like Dix's depict 'cretins' and their officially sanctioned art was mostly idealized, phisically perfect bodies.Which is ironic since one of the big reasons Hitler was never successful as a painter was that he sucked at painting people, so there was also some projection there.
>>18257873you are a stupid subhuman who wants to be fed propaganda slop like marvel movies and nazi sculptures
>>18257921German war hero.
>>18257873Looks like malformed A.I.slop
However, I’m sure this horrible scene depicting grotesqueries purposely meant to outrage and disgust onlookers is actually based and redpilled aryan art.
