/pol/ told me they are the proto-whites. How true is this claim?
>>18265304You shouldn't trust anything /pol/ tells you. But also, what does proto mean in this case?They aren't like the pre-historic whites. I would hesitate to even say they are 'white'. Considering they have very little connection to basically everything one considers white.
>>18265903They are whiter than Volga Tartars, that's for certain.
>>18265304You have to go back further than this
>>18265304maybe before getting flooded with black and south east asian black genetic admixture
>>18265903Let me guess white is when you worship a kike on a cross?
>>18265987When was north caucasus flooded with those?
>>18265304>pol/ told me they are the proto-whitesThat's where Dariel is, literally "the Gate of the Aryans".
>>18266015black slaves have been transported in for thousands of years and brown gypsies have been escaping from india for at least as long
>>18265304their ancestors were incubators for what would become wh*tes. over half of chechenya and dagestan's male lineage got replaced by yamnaya. both are majority R1b which is a foreign haplogroup in that part of the world.
>>18266037>their ancestors were incubators for what would become wh*tesThat doesn't make sense. Blondes come from the far northeast
>>18266041And blue eyes come from Italy. There used to be a semitist theory that semites civilized and colonized the whole world and developed blue eyes as they went west, but that was never taken seriously, as often as it was repeated in 20th century Cold War era texts
>>18266030You're thinking of Europe
>>18266050this map I made should help you get to grips with the situation
>>18266041not that im challenging your evidence, but i find it funny how your definition of white is blonde and blue eyes. if i ask another chud, the definition changes to pale skin and straight nose.what is for certain is the women of these nations is where CHG among europeans comes from. these churkjeets are your brothers, no matter what aesthetic criteria have for your "whiteness" social inertia.
>>18266067>but i find it funny how your definitionWhat we can say for certain is that the nose played some sort of role in Europhobic racism.
By the way, I don't know what CHG is.
>>18265987They are whiter than Volga Tartars despite Iranjeet admixture.
>>18266077CHG is one of the core ancestral populations for Europeans. It's a good metric to define whiteness. Nobody but EuROPEans and Eurasians have it. East Asians and Near Eastern Semites like Arabs don't have those genetics.
>>18266122No such thing as Eurasians, they're just Mongols, some rapebaby Indo-European daddy bvll admixture doesn't change that.
>>18266135it honestly does. that's why the politics of jeets and churkas is parallel with wh*te global interests: anti china, pro capitalism, conservative politics abroad, remittance/colonization apologism, etc. they have been brainfucked by "europeans" ever since they got invaded by them.i fully expected you to pout your lips, cross your arms like a gigantic manbaby. "They're not my brothers!!!!" but when the "race war" comes, youd be wise to accept this subhuman fifth column for what they are. everybody else is tired of you.
>>18266122Interesting. What's it stand for?
>>18266173>anti chinaImplying that being anti-china is something bad.
>>18266188you'll know in due time>>18266189it is. they are objectively the better alternative to what america offers. i don't want greater varieties of porn. i don't want mexicans and indians putting my children out of work. i don't want more elaborate, sophisticated ways to donate my organs to put a down payment on a sandwich. at this rate being anti china is being anti human.
>>18266173Tartar mongs aren't "Churkas", you idiot. Nogai mongs are not native to the Caucasus.
They have mixed so much over the millennia they now have less "proto-white" DNA, as one might expect of the Yamnaya or Corded Ware compared to Europeans, themselves highly mixed. The last group that could boast this would probably be the Cimmerians.
