Is this accurate?
Source:https://x.com/rogi0615/status/2008047044439736612
>>18277191Is that Zelda? Whats with the ears?
>>18277196No, She from Futanari no Lef
>>18277424>futanariso, trannies, there was in fact a trans emperor
>>18277432>HeliogabalusIt was this tranny who brought the cult of Sol Invictus to Rome.>In recent years, the scholarly community has become divided on Sol between traditionalists and a growing group of revisionists. In the traditional view, Sol Invictus was the second of two different sun gods in Rome. The first of these, Sol Indiges, or Sol, was believed to be an early Roman god of minor importance whose cult had petered out by the first century AD. Sol Invictus, on the other hand, was believed to be a Syrian sun god whose cult was first promoted in Rome under Elagabalus, without success. Some fifty years later, in 274 AD, Aurelian established the cult of Sol Invictus as an official religion. There has never been consensus on which Syrian sun god he might have been: some scholars opted for the sky god of Emesa, Elagabal, while others preferred Malakbel of Palmyra. In the revisionist view, there was only one cult of Sol in Rome, continuous from the monarchy to the end of antiquity. There were at least three temples of Sol in Rome, all active during the Empire and all dating from the earlier RepublicThe religion of the Roman emperor and army before Christianity was a fucking Iranian-Syriac syncretism (Mithraism) introduced by a tranny who placed his black rock solar god above Dyeus Phter and tried to marry a vestal virgin, hue.
>>18277191Just an excuse to post anime so I'll counterpost my own. That's just the early stages of constitutional monarchy, like pre-French Revolution constitutional monarchy, with a weak PM and a stronger king. Brits were doing something roughly similar to that before Robert Walpole came around in the 1720s
That kind of power-sharing is a precarious balance that has never lasted long, historically. All it takes is a weak king for the democratic body to seize power, or else a weak and divided democratic body for a strong king to usurp full control. Sometimes it might take several such tug-o-wars between the monarch and the elected body, but it shakes out in favor of one or the other before too long. The Roman system started out with the emperor as a nominal head of the senate, but even in the days of Augustus the "princeps" was nothing but pretense. Augustus ruled absolutely, the various senate-appointed titles given to him were just for show, to give the veneer of old Roman republicanism. There was no way for the Senate to actually check his power or meaningfully defy him. This is why every successive emperor saw less and less need to go along with the pretense until it was eventually dropped altogether.
>>18277191>futanari elf romePeak
>>18277432Futanari are not trans people in any setting I've ever seen. They're usually a natural third sex or a unique characteristic of a species (like in the case of futanari no elf)
>>18277748Trans people is an oxymoron
>>18277475>Just an excuse to post anime Anime website with Japanese terminology in the name.>That's just the early stages of constitutional monarchy, like pre-French Revolution constitutional monarchyBasically, in the Middle Ages there was a institution called the Three Estates, which could vaguely be considered a parliament (not to be mistaken parlement, which historically was a court of law/judicial institution in France). There the Three Estates were represented (Clergy, Nobility and Commoners), they voted per estate (meaning the commons had only 1/3 of the votes despite being the majority) and the king could not change certain legal affairs such as place illegitimate sons in the line of succession (Louis XIV tried to do this in his Testament) and taxes without their permission. The resemblance to British parliament should be pretty obvious (Clergy in the place of Lords Spiritual, Nobility in the place of House of Lords and Commoners in the place of House of Commons), though there are some subtle differences here and there. The question becomes why Britain moved towards parliamentarism and France to absolutism which is still kinda visible in their modern systems.
>>18277870The process began with Francis I, but when Louis XIV took office, his first piece of advice by Cardinal Richelieu was "Watch your ass, there are a bunch of nobles all over France seeking power and grandeur". Louis XIV as a young lad had to deal with a noble group that called themselves the Fronde. They were basically a bunch of nobles who wanted more power and believed the young king to be so weak that they could more or less take over the country. Problem was that Louis wasn't weak... at all. He pushed their shit in during the Fronde War (to put it very bluntly: Glorious Revolution except the royalists win), used the Versailles system to keep the remaining nobles in line and drew as much power to himself as possible (which the commons actually didn't hate, as it meant they got to now do the administrative jobs that once only nobles did). When Louis XV did this, most of this sword-wielding nobility was co-opted into the court society's theater, with all their military talent and lust for power reduced to gossip, banquets (yes, they became fatties), theater, concerts, adultery, promiscuity and other shit as the Affair of the Poisons and Marquis de Sade showed. What Louis XIV did not expect was that the Nobles would become both useless, and deeply in debt, transferring their role and power to bourgeois. There was no going back unless with a strong king. Louis XV and Louis XVI were not such a king. The power vacuum had paved the way for the Revolution, and the overthrowing of the nobles.
>>18277910Didn't Versailles originally have no toiletsDid the designer have a scat fetish or was it a humiliation ritual
>>18277917Nobody had toilets in the 18th century because indoor plumbing was lost Roman technology. They had privies and chamber pots. The royals of France actually had a whole special job called Groom of the Stool whose job it was to tend to the royal chamber pot.
>>18277745Oh my venus!
>>18277191>Latins are humans>Elves are Byzantines >Orcs are moslemsKino setting
>>18277424It was good before it became straight up porn.
>>18279023Publisher rejected his work mind you.
>>18277191Consul sound better than vice-president
>>18278770>the beautiful race is the one that mutilates its people as political punishment cutting off noses and shit That IS kinda kino
>>18277748A third sex would be a biologically redundant aberration. Hope that answers your question.
>>18277191Wait, does emperors wear a stole and a tunic too, just like priests do?
>>18281163Priest, emperor and military (angel).Stole specifically seems like a priestly garment, although rest of the clothes are relatively the same.
>>18280340Bulgarian are dark elf
>>18282370Russians are the wood elves
>>18282389Hungarian are wood kind
>>18280340weird Arabs that shout "kiriye eleysooooon agios atahanatosss eleison maaas hristesleysoooon" while mutilating people brutally is BASED
>>18282370>>18282389slavs are not elves by any stretch of the imagination, be honest and tell me what mythological creature this reminds you ofthey were balts and finno-ugrics once, but were taken by dark powers, twisted and mutilated, into what we see today
>>18283326hungarians are quite elflike though
>>18283342
>>18283354fuck you.
>>18278770>>Orcs are moslemsIt's MUSLIM, retarded judeochristian euroach, and no, judeochristians are more akin to orcs than us
>>18283359>Arabs that shout "Allah-umma sali Alla sayidina mohAmmedin wa alla Sayyidina Muhammad wa ala ali Abraheeeeem" is MORE based than the>weird Arabs that shout "kiriye eleysooooon agios atahanatosss eleison maaas hristesleysoooon" while mutilating people>because, Jews.Byzantines and Caliphate were both brutal mass of barbarity and despotism that ruled with fear and obsession over philosophical-linguistic complexity (Byzos called this theoria, Arabs called this kalam).
