bumo

>>18279452
does it include the al zutt part where naked browns mounted and rode your prophet the entire night?

>>18281361
no

>>18279452
Is it a revisionist book following in the vein of Crone or some slop that slaps together the sirat with Islamic tradition? You won’t learn anything from the latter except for what the Muslims think about Muhammad. Read Shoemaker’s Death of a Prophet for a better look at who Muhammad was.

These fucking Christcucks think that Muhammed got raped by these al zutt people, where if you tried to find the hadith in the sunni books, you won't get shit, but these retards will find anything and spread it on social media, fucking faggots.

>if you reject my prophet, you are a christcuck

>>18281933
Well it's the same as online Muslims continually citing the Protoevangelium of James to claim that Mary was 12 years old when she was pregnant, even though no Christian denomination considers it part of scritpure and it's just regarded as another false gospel like the Apocryphal gospels. You can't complain when Christians do the same to you.

>>18281849
sloppa has no appeal to me so I only read it because it was written by a special author who was Jewish/Communist/semi-Atheist(?) who had an independent respect for the historical figure. Wound up delivering a sound narrative.