>They have Tigers?>Shermans will do
>>18285720Well, I mean they did win in the end.
>>18285720Ahahahahah that cuck died for nothing lmfaoBahahahah he died so his race would get erased kekekekek
>>18285720Tank on tank battles mainly come down to who shoots first. It was the job of tank destroyers, anti tank guns, artillery, and aircraft to destroy the german tanks. Which they did.
>>18285955> and aircraft to destroy the german tanksAlmost never happened. Pilots (both luftwaffe and allied) massively over exaggerated kills. 50% of this is because you can't actually go over a 2nd pass to confirm kills because of enemy AA. The other 50% of it is because pilots are cocky bastards who are extremely full of themselves. Air forces in general are full of haughty fucktards who think you can win a war solely with technology
>>18286340weren't there specifically designed anti-tank rockets for allied close air support later in the war though?
>>18286381Yeah and they literally had a grand total of 0 confirmed tank kills lmao
>>18286340>You can't trust a pilot's claims of kills>Yes this German tank ace totally killed 20 tanks in a battle where just a single tank company was deployed against them
>>18286412Eisenhower said they were highly valuable weapons. I would say he knew a little more about it than you do.
>>18286429I'll take "Things I never said!" for $200 Quick guide for war stories: Any story that makes the author sound cool is false.
