>Proves objective morality, preemptively assblasts Stirner and Nietszche while btfoing any other school of moral philosophy>Proves free will, all determinists btfo>Proves the existence of god, Dawkins btfod preemptively>Destroys all previous schools of metaphysics in seconds>Successfully predicts the future of humanity>Forms an essentially correct description of the creation of the solar system using newtonian physics, 100 years before his time>Describes string theory in the 18th century
you should actually read kant not just a wiki article
>>18286619I like Kant, but he absolutely does not “prove” objective morality. He creates a framework in which we can act with others though although subjectively.
>>18286619>proves objective morality >"we should be doing good things (which I randomly decided are good) and not doing bad things (I randomly assigned those too)"
>>18286704Nonsense, he didn't assign them randomly.He was guided by the moral structure of his upbringing-So some jews in the middle east randomly assigned them for him.
