On 24 June 1652 when Louis XIV was 13 years old, his servant Pierre de La Porte undressed him for a bath and discovered that he was covered in semen, despite the fact that he had not yet reached puberty. He was likely drenched in viscous semen, as La Porte makes note of the fact of how visible the semen was.It was never confirmed who ejaculated on the boy king, and to this day historians debate on who the likely culprit was. Voltaire hypothesized that the king had ejaculated on himself, but this is unlikely, as La Porte would have been privy to the pubertal progress of the king, being that he bathed him daily, and knew that such a thing was impossible.
>>18287939It was the holey spirit
>>18287953When my grandpa was a kid they had a gay old priest named “Father Love.” Now my old pawpaw grew up in a coastal town, and so in the summers when all the kids were out playing in the water Fr. Love would show up in a Speedo. The best priests are autistic incels and the worst are predatory homosexuals.
>>18287939>13>not yet reached pubertyI think it's more likely that the servant was just wrong or had some weird reason for coming up with that story
>>18288025The average age of spermarche was 16 back then.
>>18288027I seriously doubt that considering people married and had children much younger
Apparently it was either Cardinal Mazarin, or a tutor of Louis XIV and Philippe I, hand-picked by the cardinal. Makes sense, since Philippe turned out homosexual.
>>18288029Girls reach maturity earlier than boys do, and males are usually older than females in marriages.
>>18288036That does not in any way support your claim that the average age of spermarche was 16 at the time.
>>18288037Females reach maturity earlier than males, and males are usually older than females in marriages (i.e. a man in his late teens or twenties could be impregnating a woman in her mid teens). Regardless, most in 17th century France first married in their twenties. Medical records and other forms of documentation support the fact that people reached puberty at a much later age in past centuries.Voltaire suggests that Louis XIV was capable of ejaculating at 13 because he had an unusually early puberty:>It appears that La Porte was too scrupulous and too bad a physician; he did not know that there are strongly advanced temperaments. He should above all have been silent; he was lost for having spoken, and for having attributed a very natural accident to debauchery.— Voltaire. Le Siècle de Louis XIV, auquel on a joint un précis du siècle de Louis XV , new revised edition, Vol. I (Rouen, 1788) p. 172.
>>18288048>data regarding menarche going back to 1840 suggests a longer time to reach it, so let me invent an extrapolation back to 1720 and that add a few years for the hell of it
>>18288054>so let me invent an extrapolation back to 1720 and that add a few years for the hell of itYes, because boys reach spermarche at a later age than girls reach menarche, and because the environmental conditions which made girls in 1840 reach menarche at a later age than girls do in the current day were unchanged in the 17th century. Just accept that you were wrong, and move on.
>>18287939I mean, just look at him!Kidding, truth be told the situation sounds kinda fake or exaggerated. Unless he means that there were dry drops on his clothes or something.
>>18287939>13 years old>despite the fact that he had not yet reached pubertyI was cumming at my 13
>>18287939I jizzed for the first time at the age of 11
>>18287939I was blowing loads at 13. He probably did it himself.
>>18287939Did this actually happen or it just more /his/ pedo fanfiction?
>>18288642>>18288777>>18288796There were no hormones in the food back then and perverted sex addicted women didnt piss chemical weapons into the water supply either, there was also no porn. So 13 was early to be sexually active.
>>18288037Women have started having periods earlier ever since industrialisation began. The trend has been opposite what you expect. Similarly, people typically didn't marry until mid-late 20s
>>18287939How come this wasnt a bigger deal than servant and women gossip? You would think the 13yo heir to the kingdom being raped and jizzed on would have been a much bigger deal with investigations to find the culprit lmao
>>18289410His younger brother was deliberately raped and feminized with support from his mother to ensure there was a single strong heir, Louis XIV being jizzed on a little bit was probably seen as necessary collateral damage
>>18287957preds are awful and deserve the woodchipper, but autistic priests have got to be pretty bad too. In the old days the church would stuff them into monasteries and make them copy books, which is something autists can actually do.Imagine showing up in the confessional and the priest just wants to talk about trains or dinosaurs instead of listen to the shit you did.
most human western males get their first nut off at 12/13 so this load should be assumed to be Louis' unless proven otherwise
>>18289442The semen was on his thighs and lower buttocks, consistent with pedarastic practices
>>18289439They likely would have hyper focused on Christian theology so probably not.
>>18287939Absolute degeneracy was a common thing amongs the nobility
>>18289439>In the old days the church would stuff them into monasteries and make them copy books, which is something autists can actually do.Not every autist is the same, nor do you need autism to be able to do work like that at all.
>>18288029No, they didn't. They really didn't.
And yet he ended up being surprisingly straight. Weird.
