[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Of all prior figures in world history I think he's most like Muhammad the profet, isnt he?
>>
>>18289702
No, the most like Muhammad is Isa.
>>
>>18289705
Yeshua didnt conquer one inch of land as far as I know
>>
File: Screenshot.png (46 KB, 1200x476)
46 KB
46 KB PNG
>>18289702
esl
>>18289723
not yet
>>
>>18289702
No. If you HAD to find a grandiose historical parallel Napoleon is right there.

Turning Hitler into a religious figure only got popular after his death, anyway. Before that, positive opinions on him tended towards "He is a great and impressive man", even if he still enraptured most of the world.
>>
>>18289741
If you tried you could manage a scuffed parallel between Jesus Christ and Hitler as seen by certain Esoteric Hitlerists. Serrano was basically a Catholic in practice anyway.
>>
>>18289728
They both had incredible military success, partly for sure built upon down to earth military inventions and strategy of their generals and engineers, but another part of the whole was making their followers believe in Victory and not fear Defeat. The scale of their conquest and how crucial zealous fanatical belief in the movement was in enabling the conquest (compared to other factors like economy, military training, invention, strategy etc) is what connects them as analogous figures in world history
>>
>>18289741
Napoleons conquest was driven by Napoleons personal warrior know-how and did not have zealousness of his soldiers as a crucial component in the way Hitler and Mohammad did. See >>18289744
>>
>>18289702
Muhammad was a statesman, a military general and a religious leader who founded Islam and unified Arabia under one flag, from a bunch of fragmented, feuding tribes of pagans. His influence led to the rise of the rashidun caliphate, out of irrelevance, from one solitary voice in the desert, into a powerful entity to challenge and carve it's way through two of the greatest empires in the world, reshaping the world for centuries to come.
Whether you're an atheist or a muslim, few people have impacted the course history as much as him.

How can he be compared to Hitler in any regard?
>>
>>18289702
Joseph Smith is the closest parallel I can think of
note that the Muslim conquests mostly happened after Muhammad's death.
>>
>>18289702
Muhammad made his own opinions very popular. 1/4 of people subscribe to his ideology today.

Hitler made his own opinions very unpopular. Nobody believes in imperialism, nationalism, eugenics, antisemitism, antislavism etc. as much as they used to in the interwar period.
>>
Napoleon and Hitler wish they were Muhammad so bad.
>>
>>18289702
Kinda
>>
>>18289702
Was hitler an illiterate schizo proclaiming to be in direct contact with the creator of the universe? Was hitler ever gangbanged by a group of yemeni marauders in the desert? Did hitler ever marry a 6 year old child?
No, hitler, bless his heart, was never on the same level as the propet
>>
>>18290267
>>18290327
apparently my post has upset a lot of mudslimes and nazcucks, but I've outlined quite clearly in what respect they were very much alike and historical analogues, and persuasively so >>18289744
>>
>>18289702
No that would be Joseph Smith, he invented Islam for white people



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.