[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
01/14/26(Wed)19:50:58 No.18292427
File: breaddistro.jpg (103 KB, 556x382)
103 KB
103 KB JPG
Anonymous 01/14/26(Wed)19:50:58 No.18292427 Archived
In history I keep seeing the pattern of a political party representing rich elitist interests, and the subsidized poor.
How does this pairing keep popping up in history? Why don't the subsidized poor ever turn on the elite who claim to represent them and join alternate political factions?
>>
Anonymous
01/14/26(Wed)19:54:02 No.18292430
Anonymous 01/14/26(Wed)19:54:02 No.18292430
>>18292427
Because the people in general have always been easily influenced by political propaganda.
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.