So there is this black streamer, iShowSpeed, famous for doing livestream tours across countries.He's doing an Africa tour and now hes in Egypt. He openly whined on stream today that unlike the various sub-saharian countries he visited before, hes treated very coldy by the egyptians and the goverments outright forced him to bend to a lot of restrictions to be invited.The chat convinced him that the reason is because hes black: they told him originally Egypt and the whole Northen Africa was black, but arab invaders genocided and enslaved them, forcing their race to flee south of Sahara. And they still hate blacks like himself How true are these claims?
do you not get bored of making the same bait threads over and over?
>>18293426>lower egypthigh natufian, basical arabs>upper egyptmixed with nubians>nubiansblack gods, basically looked like pic rel not shit colored like west africans
>>18293426Its not bait: this is litterally what happened. iShowSpeed was convinced its true and its currently reaching his almost 50 millions followers that the original egyptians were blacks. I want sources to either confirm it or denunce it as bullshit
>>18293456Meant for >>18293427
>>18293456north africa hasn't been black since the paleolithichttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09195-5here's an article about an individual from the egyptian old kingdom who was 60% semitic-like 25% mesopotamian and 15% MULATTO (which means he would've been like 5% "black" (most similar to fulani since this "black" population is closer to us than to subsaharans)you can stop shitposting now
>>18293456>iShowSpeedBlind retard leading the retarded blind.
>>18293426The Goal of these niggers isn't to just claim Kmt was Black for their nigger self-esteem no it's bigger than that their Goal is to claim the whole world was Black and most important the Abrahamic cult is their Black ancient African religion that was subverted by the Eurasians. The dude who started this Afrocentric cult was an Islamist from Senegal whose family was slave traders like any Sahelian islamist family, these are the niggers talking about Black excellence. The Eurocentric Egyptologists were at least Freemason christbrides trying to find the truth about their Abrahamic greek gaylord kike Exodus and accepted albeit reluctantly the conclusion that it never happened and their Chritcunt fundamentalists don't claim their cult appropriates Mesopotamia myths let alone Egyptian. These wewuzzer niggers ain't like that they deliberately subvert Kmt to claim the Abrahamic cult because once they can subvert Kmt as a "Black" civilization then they can easily claim everything under Sun comes from Africans, so they'll say Adam wuz Black, Noah wuz Black, Abraham wuz Black etc...This is what it's all about not self esteem the Slavic people who gave the word slave to history deserve that self esteem not these SSA West/East African niggers wewuzzers.
>>18293475He was 80% Berber 20% Semitic. The Semitic came from his mother, likely a Saudi sex slave. >Thus, if tracing the ancestry of many present-day Egyptians in our study to the Bronze Age, much of it would be found in groups related to Nuwayrat or alternatively to sources best represented by Middle Neolithic Morocco from which approximately 80% of Nuwayrat’s ancestry derives. The second most common ancestry component is related to the Bronze Age Levant, consistent with the ancestry detected in the Third Intermediate Period individuals. Bronze Age Caucasus ancestry is present in a fraction of the present-day Egyptians but is similar to the Bronze Age Levant ancestry60.>The mitochondrial DNA (haplogroup I/N1a1b2) and chromosome Y (haplogroup E1b1b1b2b~) haplogroups of the Nuwayrat individual are most common in present-day North African and West Asian groups (Supplementary Table4), consistent with the whole-genome affinities.
>>18293845>BerberKek. It's a made up ethnicity like Cushit
>>18293945>>18293426this is some made up reconstruction from some book in the 1800s>>18293845>He was 80% Berber 20% Semitic. The Semitic came from his mother, likely a Saudi sex slave. his "moroccan" ancestry was largely recent levant_ppnb, not berber>In this study we investigate a time series of human remains from four archaeological sites spanning the Epipalaeolithic to Middle Neolithic in current-day Morocco: the Epipalaeolithic site of Ifri Ouberrid (OUB), the Early Neolithic sites of IAM and KTG and the Middle Neolithic cemetery of Skhirat-Rouazi (SKH)>All individuals from SKH show large proportions of a genetic component maximized in individuals from Neolithic and Chalcolithic Levant, Ptolemaic Egypt and modern-day Near Eastern populations (Fig. 1d). The ancestry in SKH can be modelled as a two-way admixture between Levant Neolithic populations (roughly 76.4±4.0%) and local northwestern Africans (represented by TAF; 23.6±4.0%).
>>18294171what do you consider "berber"? keb?
>>18294235none of them, berbers didn't exist in the neolithic, and skh in particular is similar to levant_ppnb with a bit of taforalt, overall nue001 is similar to levantine ppnbs
>>18294171No. He is 80% North African and 20% Levantine. So Berber. Levant_PPNB is itself a mixed race population of Berber E1b1b men and Lebanese beurettes.
>>18294171>It's a made reconstruction from some book in the 1800sOur North African reconstructions are better than the wall paintings and even carvings which are artistic exaggeration and not true representation of the North African egyptians phenotype. Kek sandniggers.
>>18294279>No. He is 80% North African and 20% Levantine. no, see here >>18294259, it's 15% north african, 70% levantine and 15% iranic in a mesolthic/neolithic context>So Berber.>Levant_PPNB is itself a mixed race population of Berber E1b1b men and Lebanese beurettes.berbers did not exist in the neolithic or mesolithic and even today berber and north african are not synonymous
>>18293456Why the FUCK would any rational human being listen to that stupid nigger, is what I would like to know.
>>18293456bait thread confirmed, what a dumb excuse lol
>>18294292See below 80% Berber 20% female-mediated Lesbanese ancestry. >Thus, if tracing the ancestry of many present-day Egyptians in our study to the Bronze Age, much of it would be found in groups related to Nuwayrat or alternatively to sources best represented by Middle Neolithic Morocco from which approximately 80% of Nuwayrat’s ancestry derives. The second most common ancestry component is related to the Bronze Age Levant, consistent with the ancestry detected in the Third Intermediate Period individuals. Bronze Age Caucasus ancestry is present in a fraction of the present-day Egyptians but is similar to the Bronze Age Levant ancestry60.
>>18294308keyword: middle neolithic morocco, aka the skh samplesa single two-source model (P=0.12) met the significance criteria (P>0.05), which consisted of a mixture of 77.6±3.8% ancestry represented by genomes from the Middle Neolithic Moroccan site of Skhirat-Rouazi dated to 4780–4230bce (Morocco_MN), and the remainder most closely related to genomes from 9000 to 8000bce Neolithic Mesopotamia (22.4±3.8%; Fig.3a)that are largely levant_ppnb>In this study we investigate a time series of human remains from four archaeological sites spanning the Epipalaeolithic to Middle Neolithic in current-day Morocco: the Epipalaeolithic site of Ifri Ouberrid (OUB), the Early Neolithic sites of IAM and KTG and the Middle Neolithic cemetery of Skhirat-Rouazi (SKH)>All individuals from SKH show large proportions of a genetic component maximized in individuals from Neolithic and Chalcolithic Levant, Ptolemaic Egypt and modern-day Near Eastern populations (Fig. 1d). The ancestry in SKH can be modelled as a two-way admixture between Levant Neolithic populations (roughly 76.4±4.0%) and local northwestern Africans (represented by TAF; 23.6±4.0%).you must be trolling me, this is not hard to understand, therefore overall >>18294259 15% north african, 70% levantine and 15% iranic in a mesolthic/neolithic context, berbers did not exist in the neolthic
>>18294321Keyword Ancient Levantines. Modern Levantine mystery meat are unrelated to Ancient Levantines (who are closer to Berbers both paternally and autosomally) due to being rapebabies of various invaders such Iranians, Turks, French, Asheknazis and so on. And they are obviously unrelated Ancient Berbers who are obviously identical to berbers and unrelated Lesbianese mystery meat. I repeat 80% Berber 20% Caucasian mystery meat aka Lesbianese
>>18294341ancient levantines were not closer to berbers, berbers did not exist in the neolithic and levantines have no berber (e-m81/e-m183) haplogroups, so they are not the rapebabies of berbers, they have in fact no berber ancestry, and that's why you won't find 1 single study claiming that>I repeat 80% Berber 20% Caucasian mystery meat aka Lesbianesei repeat, the middle neolithic skh samples are only geographically moroccan, they are 80% levant_ppnb>a single two-source model (P=0.12) met the significance criteria (P>0.05), which consisted of a mixture of 77.6±3.8% ancestry represented by genomes from the Middle Neolithic Moroccan site of Skhirat-Rouazi dated to 4780–4230bce (Morocco_MN), and the remainder most closely related to genomes from 9000 to 8000bce Neolithic Mesopotamia (22.4±3.8%; Fig.3a)>In this study we investigate a time series of human remains from four archaeological sites spanning the Epipalaeolithic to Middle Neolithic in current-day Morocco: the Epipalaeolithic site of Ifri Ouberrid (OUB), the Early Neolithic sites of IAM and KTG and the Middle Neolithic cemetery of Skhirat-Rouazi (SKH)>All individuals from SKH show large proportions of a genetic component maximized in individuals from Neolithic and Chalcolithic Levant, Ptolemaic Egypt and modern-day Near Eastern populations (Fig. 1d). The ancestry in SKH can be modelled as a two-way admixture between Levant Neolithic populations (roughly 76.4±4.0%) and local northwestern Africans (represented by TAF; 23.6±4.0%).what are you not understand here?
>>18294361>neolithic and levantines have no berber (e-m81/e-m183)They do, they also have E-M78 which is also Berber. Neither Nuerat nor Neolithic have the Lebanese haplogroup J1 tho.
>>18294361>what are you not understand here?My line. Nuerat is E1b1b1b which is Berber. Nuerat doesn't have the Lebanese/Arab haplogroup J1. You lost, you will always be a worthless sandnigger trying to latch onto superior civilization races.
>>18294372>They dothey don't, this is just some heatmap with no actual samples used>they also have E-M78 which is also Berber. no, e-m78 is not berber and you won't find 1 single study claiming that>>18294380>Nuerat is E1b1b1b which is Berber. nuerat is not e1b1b1b> The Nuwayrat individual is genetically most similar to present-day people in North Africa and West Asia (Fig.2a and Extended Data Fig.4), which is consistent with the results from ADMIXTURE clustering40 (Extended Data Fig.5). The mitochondrial DNA (haplogroup I/N1a1b2) and chromosome Y (haplogroup E1b1b1b2b~)it's E1b1b1b2b, that is not berberdon't waste peoples time by pretending you don't understand that in 2026 e1b1b1b is not e-m81 anymore, e-m81 nowadays is E1b1b1b1a
>>18294400>>18294400>lebanese 1.3 >Cypriots 8.7>Bedouns 3.6 Nice self own >no, e-m78 is not berber and you won't find 1 single study claiming thatIt is. E-M78 is what Paleolithic Berbers carried. And all study agree it is Berber fex >The biallelic markers E-M81 and E-M78, reported as being the specific male lineage of autochthonous Berbers of North Africa- Evidence for prehistoric origins of the G2019S mutation in the North African Berber population - Rafiqua Ben El Haj1>nuerat is not e1b1b1bIt is. What it is not is J1, you won't find any study who claim this haplogroup is Ancient Egyptian. >The mitochondrial DNA (haplogroup I/N1a1b2) and chromosome Y (haplogroup E1b1b1b2b~) haplogroups of the Nuwayrat individual are most common in present-day North African and West Asian groups (Supplementary Table4), consistent with the whole-genome affinities.>it's E1b1b1b2b, that is not berberIt is.Don't waste your time trying to self insert into Berber history, you worthless sandnigger.
>>18294400You sand apes have no presence in Ancient Egypt which was E-M81 and E-M78, your presence here date back to the Arab invasion when it became a shithole full of low inbred mutts. >Studies explain the current distribution of haplogroup J1-M267 to be a result of the Arab conquests connected to the diffusion of Islamhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/11378665_Genetic_Evidence_for_the_Expansion_of_Arabian_Tribes_into_the_Southern_Levant_and_North_Africa
>>18294408>Nice self own 1.3% in levantines doesn't seem like a self own>It is. E-M78 is what Paleolithic Berbers carried. And all study agree it is Berber fexe-m78 is not a berber haplogroup, it's widespread in many populations that have nothing to do with berbers, it's not berberthe only berber markers are e-m81, e-m183 and maybe e-L19>>The biallelic markers E-M81 and E-M78, reported as being the specific male lineage of autochthonous Berbers of North Africathis does not say that it's a berber marker, simply that it exists in berbers, try again>It is. What it is not is J1, you won't find any study who claim this haplogroup is Ancient Egyptian. it's E1b1b1b2b, that in modern nomenclature is E-CTS101880https://isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_HapgrpE.htmlthis is not a berber haplogroupi know you're trolling or being annoying on purpose
>>18294416>Ancient Egypt which was E-M81 and E-M78e-m78 sure, that haplogroup has nothing to do with berbers, but it wasn't e-m81, berbers are irrelevant to the argument, old kingdom egyptians were not genetically berber (they were mostly levant_ppnb), they didn't have a berber haplogroup (E-CTS10880 is not downstream from E-M81), they didn't speak berberalso why are you replying 2 times to my comments
>>18294433>1.3% in levantines doesn't seem like a self own1-8%. You lost. >The biallelic markers E-M81 and E-M78, reported as being the specific male lineage of autochthonous Berbersi.e. It is a Berber marker. >e-m78 is not a berber haplogroup, it's widespread in many populations that have nothing to do with berbers, it's not berberIberomaurusians were E-M78 is infact even more Berber than E-M81 which entered into the Maghreb from Egypt. >it's E1b1b1b2b, that in modern nomenclature is E-CTS101880Irrelevant. The entirety of E1b1b1b is Berber/North African. >i know you're trolling or being annoying on purposeBeing annoyed at facts sound like a YOU issue.
>>18294437They have the Berber haplogroup E1b1b1b, they are 80% Berber, and they are located in North Afrca. They are NOT J1 which is the Arab hapogroup, they are NOT 80% Arab, they are NOT located in the Levant.Ancient Egypts has nothing do with Arabs. Claiming otherwise is pure wewuzzery.
what's this obsession of anachronistic projection of ethnicity on /his/
>>18294440>1-8%. You lost. cypriots are not levantines>i.e. It is a Berber marker.no, if it was a berber maker they would have call it a berber marker, it's simply present among berber lineages (not very much either). the only haplogroup ever called berber marker is e-m81>Iberomaurusians were E-M78 is infact even more Berber than E-M81 which entered into the Maghreb from Egypt. iberomaurusians are not berber, e-m78 was also carried by levant ppnbs, e-m78 is carried by somalis and ethiopians in large percentages, that certainly are not berber admixed>Irrelevant. The entirety of E1b1b1b is Berber/North African. according to modern nomenclatures, no, only E1b1b1b1 (e-L19), E1b1b1b1a (e-M81) and E1b1b1b1a1 (e-M183) are berber>Being annoyed at facts sound like a YOU issue.no, you are clearly trolling, are you the OP, it would make sense that this is just a way to bump your own threadsalso E1b1b1b2b (E-CTS10880) is not even under e-m78, it's under E1b1b1b2, a typical natufian haplogroup also present in ppnbs, so the nuerat sample is just patrilinearly natufian/ppnb
>>18294449>They have the Berber haplogroup E1b1b1bthey have E1b1b1b2b that is not berber, only E1b1b1b1a (e-M81) is berber>they are 80% Berbernope, they are 80% morocco_mn/skh, that is itself 80% ppnb, overall they're largely levant_ppnb>a single two-source model (P=0.12) met the significance criteria (P>0.05), which consisted of a mixture of 77.6±3.8% ancestry represented by genomes from the Middle Neolithic Moroccan site of Skhirat-Rouazi dated to 4780–4230bce (Morocco_MN), and the remainder most closely related to genomes from 9000 to 8000bce Neolithic Mesopotamia (22.4±3.8%; Fig.3a)>In this study we investigate a time series of human remains from four archaeological sites spanning the Epipalaeolithic to Middle Neolithic in current-day Morocco: the Epipalaeolithic site of Ifri Ouberrid (OUB), the Early Neolithic sites of IAM and KTG and the Middle Neolithic cemetery of Skhirat-Rouazi (SKH)>All individuals from SKH show large proportions of a genetic component maximized in individuals from Neolithic and Chalcolithic Levant, Ptolemaic Egypt and modern-day Near Eastern populations (Fig. 1d). The ancestry in SKH can be modelled as a two-way admixture between Levant Neolithic populations (roughly 76.4±4.0%) and local northwestern Africans (represented by TAF; 23.6±4.0%).berbers did not exist in the neolithic btw, you just sound like a troll, just admit it, you're OP trying to generate a conversation to bump your own otherwise dead thread
>>18294463>cypriots are not levantinesRetard lol >no, if it was a berber maker they would have call it a berber marker, it's simply present among berber lineages (not very much either). the only haplogroup ever called berber marker is e-m81No they would've referred to it as a Berber lineage which they did. What a pathetic low iq semantic cope. >iberomaurusians are not berber, They are. They are the indigenous population of North Africa actually, you cannot be more berber than this. >e-m78 was also carried by levant ppnbs,They are younger, they carry it as a result of Iberomaurusian migrations.> e-m78 is carried by somalis and ethiopians in large percentages, that certainly are not berber admixedUtterly irrelevant. Europeans and Arabs also carry E-M81 in large percentage doesn't change its origin. >also E1b1b1b2b (E-CTS10880) is not even under e-m78, it's under E1b1b1b2Yes it is E1b1b1b which is related to E-M81 but not E-M78. Another self own your part. >, a typical natufian haplogroup also present in ppnbs, so the nuerat sample is just patrilinearly natufian/ppnbNatufians were Berber migrants, and are extinct now. The Arab haplogroup J1 you're not realted to them. A random Berber (E1b1b1b) is closer to them (E1b1b1b) than you are.
>>18294463Cypriots aren't the Levantines with the highest level of E-M81 either, that would be Lebanese, these little iranjeet carry 16% of our semen in their veins obviously through Ancient Egyptian raping their way accross Lesbianon.
>>18294485cypriots are not levantines, they're recognized as greek>No they would've referred to it as a Berber lineage which they did. What a pathetic low iq semantic cope. no, it's simply present among berbers, about 10 times less than it is present among somalis>They are. They are the indigenous population of North Africa actually, you cannot be more berber than this. you can actually, by being a berber, modern berbers are only between 25-45% iberomaurusian, the berber identity and language did not exist in the mesolithic, why do you have such a hard time understanding that modern ethnicities didn't exist in 10000 bce?>They are younger, they carry it as a result of Iberomaurusian migrations.they carry them because of natufians>Utterly irrelevant. Europeans and Arabs also carry E-M81 in large percentage doesn't change its origin. europeans and arabs (outside of northwest african arabs) don't carry e-m81 in large percentages, and when they carry it the origin is clearly from berber migrations and mixing, while there's no evidence of berber migrations to somalia>Yes it is E1b1b1b which is related to E-M81 but not E-M78. Another self own your part.no it's not a self own, E1b1b1b1a (e-M81) is from a different branch compared to E1b1b1b2>Natufians were Berber migrants, and are extinct now. The Arab haplogroup J1 you're not realted to them. A random Berber (E1b1b1b) is closer to them (E1b1b1b) than you are.natufians were not berbers, berbers did not exist in the mesolithicyou are obviously trolling, this is a bunch of the most idiotic nonsense everi remember having this same discussion with you, (don't even deny it) where you concluded that nuerat were "nubian slaves"https://desuarchive.org/his/thread/18216218/#18217507curiously same bait thread about the race of ancient egyptians, you are clearly OP trolling and creating a discussion to bump your own low quality bait thread
>>18294501considering the fact that 95% of lebanese are christian or muslim and only 5% of the lebanese population is druze, and that christians are, according to your chart 0% e-m81 and mulsims are 2% e-m81, overall lebanese are around 1% e-m81
>>18294502>cypriots are not levantines, they're recognized as greekSee >>18294501 16% of Lebanse carry our Semen. >modern berbers are only between 25-45% iberomaurusianNo Berber is 45% or even 25% IBM. You are on drug. >no, it's simply present among berbers, about 10 times less than it is present among somalisOkay it is Somali thus not North Africa/Ancient Egyptian. I can agree to this. >they carry them because of natufiansNatufians aren't- E-M78. You're a complete retard whith no understand of subclades. >no it's not a self own, E1b1b1b1a (e-M81) is from a different branch compared to E1b1b1b2No it's the same line. You lost.>natufians were not berbers, berbers did not exist in the mesolithicYour claim fall apart on its own as you have repeatdly claimed E-M81 is Berber and thus that Berber existed during the Mesolithic. >europeans and arabs (outside of northwest african arabs) don't carry e-m81 in large percentagesIberians are up to 40% E-M81. Arabs are up to 100% E-M81. Your logic collapse on itself;
>>18294508>See >>18294501 16% of Lebanse carry our Semen. see >>18294505only the druze, that are a small percentage of the lebanese population, i'm more and more convinced that you're trolling>No Berber is 45% or even 25% IBM. You are on drug. yes, this is common knowledge, again, clearly trolling here>Okay it is Somali thus not North Africa/Ancient Egyptian. I can agree to this. it is of natufian origin, 3 natufian carried E1b1b1b2 >>18294463, levantine ppnbs were clearly responsible for some backmigration and carried E1b1b1b2 to africa, including egypt>No it's the same line. You lost.it's not, e-m81 (E1b1b1b1a) is from E1b1b1b1, while the nuerat, that is E1b1b1b2b, is from E1b1b1b2>Your claim fall apart on its own as you have repeatdly claimed E-M81 is Berber and thus that Berber existed during the Mesolithic. no i didn't, e-m81 is berber, and berbers didn't exist in the mesolithic, the berber identity postdate the neolithic, regardless of how ancient e-m81 is>Iberians are up to 40% E-M81. Arabs are up to 100% E-M81. Your logic collapse on itself;no it doesn't, only northwest african arabs have such high percentages of e-m81 and only the pasiegos in europe that are likely of berber origin, have 40% e-m81
>>18294502No scientists consider E-M81 to be an exclusive Berber lineage either that just something you made up. What they consider it to be is the autochtonous lineage of North Africa i.e. what Ancient Egyptians & Libyans carried who are basically the same race the only difference being the former became settled while the latter stayed nomads. The also consider E-M78 to be a Sub-Saharan marker i.e. Cushitic marker and thus unrelated to Ancient Egyptians. I was actually being nice by referring to E-M78 as North African, but if you want to speak truthfully it's a Somali/Nubian bloodline and thus not Egyptian. Only the North African E-M81 can be considered Egyptian.
>>18294519>yes, this is common knowledge, again, clearly trolling hereShow me a single peer-reviewed study supporting 25% IBM not even asking about 45% because it's obviously BS. >it is of natufian originSee your own post "no it doesn't, only northwest african arabs have such high percentages of e-m81 and only the pasiegos in europe that are likely of berber origin" They have it because they are of likely Berber origin.Also Iberomaurusian carried E-M78 which is distinct from Natufian E-Z830 which is descended from the North African marker E-Z827.You are either a drooling retard or trolling.
>>18294525https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378111915001900>Genetic studies indicate that the contemporary populations of Spain are not uniform. The Basque, for example, is characterized by several high frequency genetic markers including Y haplogroup R1b and its derivative R1b1b2 at 87.1% (highest in Western Europe) (Alonso et al., 2005, Balaresque et al., 2010) and the blood groups' Rh negative and O alleles, at 35% and 55% (Cavalli-Sforza et al., 1994, Capelli et al., 2009), respectively, but exhibits one of the lowest frequencies (2%) in Iberia of the Berber marker E1b1b1b1a-M81 on the Y chromosome (Flores et al., 2004). >>18294540>Show me a single peer-reviewed study supporting 25% IBM not even asking about 45% because it's obviously BS. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982219312412>They have it because they are of likely Berber origin.berbers did not exist in the mesolithic, so that's an impossibility>Also Iberomaurusian carried E-M78 which is distinct from Natufian E-Z830 which is descended from the North African marker E-Z827.E-Z827 is not a north african marker
>>18294546wth nafris are actually octoroons even discounting the ANA admix
>>18294548their west african ancestry is comparable to egyptians
>>18294546No 45% + garbage modeling. The component linked to E-M81 is related to IAM which is Capsian and not IBM. IBM is only linked to E-M78. >European Absolutely retarded BS, Euro are mutts of ANE, AASI and other component not found among North Africans. >E-Z827 is not a north african markerAccording to who, some inbred bedouin on 4chan?
E-Z827 is not a north african marker btw
>>18294563>No 45%saharawis are almost 40%>The component linked to E-M81 is related to IAM which is Capsian and not IBM. IBM is only linked to E-M78.IAM samples and iberomaurusians were genetically very similar>Absolutely retarded BS, Euro are mutts of ANE, AASI and other component not found among North Africans. for the purpose of our argument it's a good model it captures the right percentages of iberomaurusian ancestry>According to who, some inbred bedouin on 4chan?it's not a north african clade, it's found in the mesolithic near east too, and no one ever called it a north african clade in any study
>>18294548wtf snowniggers and sandniggers are 30% monkey
>>18294575yikes I'd be spiteful too, if I was the product of zoophilia between human and monkeys
>>18294575Anon they're 20% monkey, still very high tho
>>18294575why are you so pressed? there's nothing wrong with being part black amine
>>18294574As a result of North Africans migrating there and raping the CHG natives. It's not a Near East haplogroup, it's a North African marker peaking among Berbers, only J1 is Near Eastern.
>>18294587E-Z827 is not north african and does not peak among berbers, the berber marker is e-m81 and all its subclades, e-L19 its upstream blade is also strongly berber related, but E-Z827 has no unique relations to berbers
>>18294585And there's nothing wrong with being 20% monkey. You're simply not the same as us, but that doesn't make you inferior, just different.
>>18294589E-Z827 is North African and peaks at 100% frequency among Berbers & North African Arabs. Lebanese are 0-1% E-Z827 due to being of North African origin.
>>18294596>E-Z827 is North African and peaks at 100% frequency among Berbers & North African Arabs.E-Z827 is not north african and peaks in a lot of places, including the sahel or east africa or some parts of the middle east
>>18294601The Sahel is 1% E-Z827 and due to North Africans mixing with the Blacks, East Africa is barely 10% again due to North African mixing with the Blacks there. The actual East African lineage is E-M78 and the actual Sahelian lineage is E-M2.>or some parts of the middle eastE-Z827 is non-existent in the Middle East or at best found at most at 16% due to berber migrations.
>>18294611E-Z827 is not north african in origin, there is not study claiming that, also e1b1b1b2b is the main natufian haplogroup, inherited by ppnb levantines, and is not north african, the nuerat is simply patrilinearly levant ppnb
>>18294612E-Z827 is not of Near East origin, it is North African marker. E1b1b1b2b and descended from the North African marker E1b1b1b which peaks at 100% frequency in North Africa. The dominant and actual Near East lineage is J1. The Nuerat sample is paternally related to Berbers but not to Near Easterners.
>>18294612>levant ppnblevant ppnb were North African migrants and unrelated to modern levantines who are barely 10% Natufian/Levant_N and paternally 0-5% Natufian/Levant_N .
>>18294620>E-Z827 is not of Near East origin, it is North African marker. nope, it's not a north african marker and no study ever claimed that, that's why you aren't posting any>>18294622>levant ppnb were North African migrants and unrelated to modern levantines who are barely 10% Natufian/Levant_N and paternally 0-5% Natufian/Levant_N .no, they weren'tyou replied multiple times to the same comment, you are getting desperate
I crushed that AAMU monkeyfeel good bro
>>18294630You're arguing with several anons
>>18294641i'm definitely not
>>18294622>Everyone who disagrees with me is the same person!
>>18294641Don't waste your time
>>18294656you have a peculiar way of writing, and your insane claims like "levant_ppnbs were berber migrants" that not even the most ardent pro berber poster would say can only come from one person
>>18294630>s-samefag
*sigh* I knew this would happen
>>18294679>Claim North African achievements>Attempt to erase actual North Africans from their own history>Get called out for having no credible historical or cultural ties to North AfricaWow, who could’ve predicted this outcome?
