We already know that culturally there is a lot, a lot, a lot of non-Indo-European influence and appropriation in cultures derived from the so-called "PIE," but one subject that captivates me is the substrate There are good arguments for the Germanic substratum, and it is supported by top-tier linguists, but the same occurs with Goidelic, which has many loanwords related to fishing and sea from a "mysterious" non-Indo-European language. (Paleo-Atlantic) These include Partan 'crab' and Gliomach 'lobster'. Read George Broderick, the Indo-European killer. Furthermore, we have Etruscans and all the non-Indo-European languages in Iberia, which means that Indo-European lost to Megalithic Sardinians. The situation worsens for you when Irish didn't have /pʰ/ at all, and the earliest Latin loans substitute Latin /p/ by /kʰ(u)/. So, this must have been brought into the language *after* that. and PG was not a language formed until the Iron Age. Goidelic were borrowed from a donor language spoken in the Northern EEF won again.Actually, GAC itself actually survives in Poland for a long time- Corded Ware expands in every direction around them.Globular Amphora were mainly pastoralists, and very warlike people who invanded along the amber trade, even into Ukrainian yamnaya territory. Corded Ware expansion was probably a koryos-led counter expansion, but they lost.Also it probably wasn't this peacefulT: Sardinian aka GAC 3;
>>18294678Ah yes, the girl from Sardinia is back. You're still the same pathetic, arrogant person as always with your schizophrenic theories, right? First, this article is a bit outdated with new discoveries. Second, the expansion of the CW didn't happen simply because some EEFoid group survived longer than it should have.
>>18294678>the so-called "PIE,"weird crank thread
>>18294685I honestly don't know who that is is she just another new character for the album of retards on /his/?>>18294678>There are good arguments for the Germanic substratumNo, there isn't. The theory you're thinking of about the "pre-IE" superstratum in Germanic languages is discarded today. Name your favorite linguists and I'll name mine; those figures of "40%", "30%" are all discarded>Goidelic were borrowed from a donor language spoken in the Northern EEF won againYou can't prove that. We don't know what these "Atlantic languages" were like, and in fact it's natural for them to have a substrate. The same occurs with almost all Aryan languages, but when they say "substrate" it doesn't always mean "non-Ie," look at the case of Greek.
>>18294693>>18294689She's a lunatic who LARPs as Neolithic farmers because she saw some G25 chart about how Sardinians are "pure EEF" or something, so she decided to make these shitty threads. I think it's her boyfriend or something bcause wimen Haplotard are restricted to xiiter In short, she's the EEFoid version of the Frisian
lmao at all the midwit seethe ITTanyways OP you learning more about the Amber Road and tin trade during the bronze age would be beneficial Iberia has been a unique case for a long time, your primary sources on that are the antique Roman and Greek witnessesPIE is a conceit of linguistics, the entire field is conceited and self referential in a wayreconstructions are merely hypothetic, their etymological presumptions aren't always well foundedtrying to speculate about prehistoric population movements from more than 4000 years ago in exclusive terms is basically pointless>GACarchaeogenetics discussion, and in an unfortunate way the field itself is a crockliterally not worth involving yourself withthey just discovered that bone in the inner ear which preserves ADNA in specimens thought irrecoverable a few years agothere are *no* high fidelity representative models from antiquity of prehistoric populations because the sample sizes are so absolutely minimalin fact, this is a problem that we haven't even solved in the modern worldsomething like less than 1 percent of the people *currently* alive have been sequenced, which is very statistically below the threshold of significance (meaning, you wouldn't even have the confidence required to make positive correlations much less claim a causal); this trend compounds exponentially the further you go back in timeall you really have is a limited selection of modern populations on a global PCA that these archaic people are hamfisted into and hyperbolic projections bumped by survivorship bias projected temporally backwardsSapiens Neanderthals weren't even recognized as being capable of interbreeding with Sapiens Sapiens until 2010, Denisovans were only recognized recently they are finding ghost populations constantly that defy expectations and how many geneticists predicted these developments, the list is smalldoes genetics even have predictive validity, is it a real science with actual experiments being run
>>18294757weird crank post
Shitty thread lmao
>>18294685What? We have girls in this board?
>>18294896Girls with penises
bump for a single non shill thread
>>18295440You just think it's worth bumping an /x/-tier thread made by a crank
