[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 960px-SAVAK.svg.png (457 KB, 960x1224)
457 KB
457 KB PNG
Was the SAVAK really that bad? How much of the uproar against the Shah had to do with state repression as opposed to ordinary economic difficulties?
The Shah's repression of communists and clerical subversives just look like Turkey's Kemalist authoritarianism, so why did one work; while the other suffered a revolt?
>>
>>18294807
Only 3000 people were imprisoned during the shahs entire reign and most of them are the same Islamists who current run the country, including the current supreme leader. So the “both shah and ayatollah are equally bad” crowd can GTFO



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.