[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why cant africans, South asians, And amerindians make art?
Middle easten are not african btw same for egyptian
>>
Why can rightoids make art?
>>
>>18294932
Porn isnt art tranny.
>>
>>18294931
They can
>>
File: 1768553983.jpg (257 KB, 991x942)
257 KB
257 KB JPG
>>18294931
>South asians

Lol. Indians were making left-side picrel in 250 BCE while Nordics only made right-side picrel statues until the Renaissance, more than 1000 years later them, while muzzies haters of Art, Images and Statues were invading India.
>>
File: images(204).jpg (10 KB, 498x280)
10 KB
10 KB JPG
>>18294953
>Indians
Those were aryans, shitjeets never built anything
>>
>>18294935
>a spiteful poem that reads like a 4chan shitpost qualifies as art
>>
>>18294931
never seen a totem pole before?
>>
>>18294960
>Mauryans of fucking 3th Century
>Aryans

Lol again.

>The Lion Capital of Ashoka is the capital, or head, of a column erected by the Mauryan emperor Ashoka in Sarnath, India, c.250 BCE

>Erected after Ashoka's conversion to Buddhism, it commemorated the site of Gautama Buddha's first sermon some two centuries before

The funny thing is that Buddhist writers we wuzzing Chandragupta Maurya, founder of the first Indian empire, with the Shakyas because of his grandson Ashoka's patronage of them.

>The Puranas describe Mauryas as Shudras

>'Mudrakshasa' of Vishakhadatta uses the terms Vrishal/Kulhina (of low clan)

>The Classical writers, such as Justin, describe Chandragupta only as a man of humble origin

>The Junagarh Rock Inscription of Rudradaman (150 AD) has some indirect evidence, suggesting that Mauryas might have been of Vaishya origin

>The Buddhist work, on the other hand, try to link the Mauryan dynasty with the Sakya Kshatriya clan to which Buddha belonged

>According to them, the region from which the Mauryas came was full of peacocks (Mor), and hence they came to known as 'Moriyas'

>It is obvious from this that the Buddhists were trying to elevate the social position of Ashoka (their patron) and his predecessors

>In conclusion, we can say that the Mauryas belonged to the Moriya tribe and were certainly of a low caste, though it is not clear as to which low caste
>>
File: 1742850937310.png (1.57 MB, 1080x1080)
1.57 MB
1.57 MB PNG
>>18294979
The Shakyas themselves were lower-caste hapa mutts.

>The Shakyas were an eastern sub-Himalayan ethnic group on the periphery, both geographically and culturally, of the eastern Indian subcontinent in the 5th century BCE. Bronkhorst calls this eastern culture Greater Magadha and notes that "Buddhism and Jainism arose in a culture which was recognized as being non-Vedic". According to Levman, the Shakyas were considered outside of the Āryāvarta and of ‘mixed origin’ (saṃkīrṇa-yonayaḥ, possibly part Aryan and part Himalayan). The laws of Manu treats them as being non Aryan. As noted by Levman, "The Baudhāyana-dharmaśāstra (1.1.2.13–4) lists all the tribes of Magadha as being outside the pale of the Āryāvarta; and just visiting them required a purificatory sacrifice as expiation" (In Manu 10.11, 22). This is confirmed by the Ambaṭṭha Sutta, where the Sakyans are said to be "rough-spoken", "of menial origin" and criticised because "they do not honour, respect, esteem, revere or pay homage to Brahmans." Some of the non-Vedic practices of this tribe included incest (marrying their sisters), the worship of trees, tree spirits and nāgas

>However, Buddhism notably rejects fundamental Vedic doctrines such as atman (substantial self or soul), Brahman (a universal eternal source of everything) and the existence of a creator God (Ishvara). Instead, Buddhism teaches not-self (anatman) and dependent arising as fundamental metaphysical theories. Buddhism also rejects the scriptural authority of the Vedas (and other Hindu texts) and rejects Vedic teachings regarding ritual, caste and sacrifice
>>
>>18294931
Africans were building picrel while the greatest structures whites could build were mud huts and Arabs tents.

>egyptian
Correct. modern egyptians are bedouins. However Ancient Egyptians were North Africans who viewed Ionian Dogs (i.e. whites) and Vile Asiatics (i.e. arabs) as worthless subhumans only fit to be trampled under their sandals. Likening Ancient Egyptians to either of them is like comparing gold to diarrhea or a human to a neanderthal monkey.
>>
>>18294931



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.