/his/ - historically why have marxists been so opposed to - History & Humanities

Anonymous

02/03/26(Tue)02:59:44 No.18326598

File: hq720-3.jpg (87 KB, 686x386)

Anonymous 02/03/26(Tue)02:59:44 No.18326598 Archived

historically why have marxists been so opposed to prostitution? you'd think they would be for evening out the sexual market, in a society without prostitution only the wealthiest have easy access to sex and sexual satisfaction

Anonymous
02/03/26(Tue)03:02:12 No.18326599

Anonymous 02/03/26(Tue)03:02:12 No.18326599

>>18326598
Who gives a shit. Women will always find a way to sell their holes for benefits. It happens everywhere, even in fucking gas station jobs, let alone office work.

Anonymous
02/03/26(Tue)03:03:59 No.18326602

Anonymous 02/03/26(Tue)03:03:59 No.18326602

>>18326599
so why oppose sex work?

Anonymous
02/03/26(Tue)03:29:20 No.18326637

Anonymous 02/03/26(Tue)03:29:20 No.18326637

>>18326598
Because it messes with the family structure, which fucks up how your society works, and is fundamentally capitalist and individualist to its core.

Anonymous
02/03/26(Tue)03:30:25 No.18326638

Anonymous 02/03/26(Tue)03:30:25 No.18326638

File: paternity france.jpg (179 KB, 1189x633)

179 KB JPG

>>18326637
>Because it messes with the family structure
Oh no

Anonymous
02/03/26(Tue)03:53:10 No.18326651

Anonymous 02/03/26(Tue)03:53:10 No.18326651

The original Marxists and oldschool commies considered all forms of sexual degeneracy inherently bourgeoisie. Uncorrupted workers only have heterosexual marital sex.

Anonymous
02/03/26(Tue)04:25:56 No.18326679

Anonymous 02/03/26(Tue)04:25:56 No.18326679

>>18326651
This. And most women are motivated by their bad economic positions to become prostitutes. Even to this day human trafficing and taking advantage of women from poor regions is part and parcel when it comes to regulated prostitution. I don't even want to know that occurs in the "unregulated" underbelly of this business.

Anonymous
02/03/26(Tue)05:11:46 No.18326718

Anonymous 02/03/26(Tue)05:11:46 No.18326718

>>18326679
>I don't even want to know that occurs in the "unregulated" underbelly of this business
exactly that's why it's retarded to keep it illegal and unregulated in order to stop trafficking
>most women are motivated by their bad economic positions
that applies to pretty much all low wage jobs and jobs in service sectors.

Anonymous
02/03/26(Tue)06:12:22 No.18326763

Anonymous 02/03/26(Tue)06:12:22 No.18326763

>>18326718
Anon, trafficing also takes places in legal and regulated prostitution venues.

Anonymous
02/03/26(Tue)06:52:31 No.18326783

Anonymous 02/03/26(Tue)06:52:31 No.18326783

>>18326763
most countries wuth legal prostitution don't have it properly regulated since christcuck or feminist moralfags oppose stuff like licensed or state owned brothels

Anonymous
02/03/26(Tue)07:09:07 No.18326794

Anonymous 02/03/26(Tue)07:09:07 No.18326794

>>18326598
Prostitutes = capitalists
Incels = socialists

> in a society without prostitution only the wealthiest have easy access to sex and sexual satisfaction
We have abundance of prostitute yet sex inequality is stronger than ever

Anonymous
02/03/26(Tue)07:34:29 No.18326814

Anonymous 02/03/26(Tue)07:34:29 No.18326814

Marxists don't consider making it easier for women to become petite bourgeoisie to be a goal worth expending effort on

Anonymous
02/03/26(Tue)07:39:40 No.18326819

Anonymous 02/03/26(Tue)07:39:40 No.18326819

>>18326602
>work
spreading genital herpes is not work, strictly speaking

Anonymous
02/03/26(Tue)08:35:42 No.18326891

Anonymous 02/03/26(Tue)08:35:42 No.18326891

>>18326819
define work

Anonymous
02/03/26(Tue)10:01:53 No.18326990

Anonymous 02/03/26(Tue)10:01:53 No.18326990

>>18326637
>Because it messes with the family structure
Correct.
/thread

Anonymous
02/03/26(Tue)12:48:52 No.18327179

Anonymous 02/03/26(Tue)12:48:52 No.18327179

>>18326891
I mean, I guess technically biological warfare is considered 'work' in some circles
I do not belong to those circles though