My heart rends whenever I think about late Roman emperors such as Diocletian or Julian. These men were the final bastions against the eventual European conversion to Christianity.Had Christianity been defeated in its jewish crib, the White race never would've adopted its philosemitism and moral weakness. Jews never would've been venerated and achieved power, and the morality that led to guilt and atonement never would've been believed.Now we have jews in our government and browns on our streets, and we can't do anything about it - all because of Christian morality. All because of the perverted moral of "equality." I hate to say it, but even Islam would've been better for the White race - and if worshipping a Zuttslut is an improvement, then that's really bad.
Didn’t Julian literally try to rebuild the Jewish Temple?
>>18327519>it's da joos
>>18327521Yes but it was an attempt to undermine Jewish prophecies about its destruction.
>>18327521Solely to piss off Christians and stoke tension between them.
>>18327519Why is Christianity morally weak to you? Explain to me how continued pagans would have behaved in the collapsed world after the fall of Rome, and how it would have been better for European civilization. How pagan morality would have helped the “white man” (Amerimutt colonial term) to conquer the world like he did under Christianity
>>18327527Jews and Christians, is my point.>>18327616>(Amerimutt colonial term)I know you're brown or slavic but I'll answer anyway. Paganism venerated fighting and tribalism. European Whites still would've conquered the world, possibly sooner, but what would really change is that we would still have those empires now. Instead of showing mercy to the conquered natives at the behest of the church, or elevating them like the Enlightened idealists, they would've been enslaved, exterminated, or put into lower castes. We wouldn't have White Guilt nor antiracism that has led to what we are suffering now. We have nonwhites in our countries taking over our institions and decrying us (see: "White Privilege") and jews literally organising interracial rape of White women on yachts (see: Epstein Files) and no one stops it. Paganism never would've tolerated jewish supremacy. It's a kill or be killed world, and Christianity is why we're the latter. I believed in Christ up until last year when I started doubting and now I fucking hate the Bible and the Churches with all my heart. They killed my people and no one gives a shit.
wah wah...coulda woulda shoulda faglick rabbi balls
>>18327519>My heart rends whenever I think about late Roman emperors such as Diocletian or Julian. These men were the final bastions against the eventual European conversion to Christianity.>Had Christianity been defeated in its jewish crib, the White race never would've adopted its philosemitism and moral weakness. Jews never would've been venerated and achieved power, and the morality that led to guilt and atonement never would've been believed.>Now we have jews in our government and browns on our streets, and we can't do anything about it - all because of Christian morality. All because of the perverted moral of "equality." I hate to say it, but even Islam would've been better for the White race - and if worshipping a Zuttslut is an improvement, then that's really bad.
>>18327680Hey now, don't alienate the tradcaths from North America. Now only Latinx can deboonk me.>>18327677I'll leave that to the Galileans.
>>18327666I’m not a brown or slav. I’m Scottish. Paganism venerated fighting and tribalism but it could also venerate it to absurd degrees. Who’s to say Western Europeans (Roman civilization still would have collapsed without Christianity), would have united and came together in the same way that they did i. our timeline if they were constantly fighting each other over tribal squabbles and autistic infighting about honour and cattle? I don’t deny that Western Europeans are a very smart people, but the problem is that we are essentially a fish in water, 1700 years of our morality has been Christian and pagan morality is generally alien to us. No, not everyone back then was an atheistic Nietzschean who did what was “based” and “mighty” unlike the meek passive Christians. It’s far more complicated than that. Within historic Christendom, wars were still fought but generally were limited in scope and had to be for a good reason. In a purely pagan, decentralised Europe who knows how much needless bloodshed we would go over for centuries. >conquer the world soonerYou generally can’t do that without industrialisation. Even then you can’t. Far more likely that pagan settlers and conquerors would enslave and then filter into the conquered people outside of Europe. Like the Vikings did. Not establish empires like the British or Spanish, so they could convert and tax them.>Epstein, Jewish financial controlNothing to do with Christianity. In fact, in a properly Christian-Western society (100 years ago) they would never have had an in. We are atheistic materialists now and addicted to comfort so no one dares raise a finger. There’s many reasons on how these monsters make their wealth but Christianity is not one of them. I also don’t believe in “Jewish supremacy”. They are a merchant people that have always controlled finances and in our 21st century world only have power so long as ethnic Europeans are passive and demoralised enough.
>>18327690>Nothing to do with ChristianityEverything. Christianity gave jews power as early as Constantine.> in a properly Christian-Western society (100 years ago) they would never have had an inThey already did you dumb fuck. That's how the WWs happened, it's how the Frankfurt School happened, it's how the Bolshevik Revolution happened. Epstein is downstream from the Rothschilds (see: Epstein Files).>I also don’t believe in “Jewish supremacy”.But you celebrate the defeat of Germany in WWII and are horrified by the Holocaust. You Christcucks always claim to be for Europe but when the hands need to be bloodied for it, there's no finite black or jewish feet you won't lick to prevent it.To your previous points, there were plenty of European divisions as a result of Christianity. The Reformation and Christian alliances with Muslims, for instance. Not sure why you think Christianity united Europe when Rome managed centuries prior. Remember, it was Christians who converted the jews and moors post-Reconquista instead of exiling or killing them.
>>18327722>>18327690Denounce Vishnu.
>>18327729I do denounce Vishnu and the Dravidian race. I also denounce the Christian NGOs abetting the migration of Indians to England.
>>18327722You’re simply wrong. Christians have always been wary of Jews, and indeed, Talmudics only arose in the 6th century in Arabia defined by their explicit rejection of the Christ.
>>18327729>when the Mexican calls you Indian for not believing in the Bronze Age Jewish mythology followed mostly by AfricansBrown internet theory
paganism was ooga booga shit lol. like sacrifice a goat to appease the storm god so he rains on your crops. the Greeks by the classical age were already replacing the gods with speculative philosophy.
>>18327754They did not reject the gods, the philosophers believed that the gods were abstract metaphysical spirits. Do you know what Neoplatonism even is? It was the standard view amongst educated pagans before the Christianization of Rome.
>>18327519>browns on our streetsThis is also true of Imperial Rome though? Juvenal made fun of it.
>My heart rends whenever I think about late Roman emperors such as Diocletian or Julian. These men were the final bastions against the eventual European conversion to Christianity.>Had Christianity been defeated in its jewish crib, the White race never would've adopted its philosemitism and moral weakness. Jews never would've been venerated and achieved power, and the morality that led to guilt and atonement never would've been believed.>Now we have jews in our government and browns on our streets, and we can't do anything about it - all because of Christian morality. All because of the perverted moral of "equality." I hate to say it, but even Islam would've been better for the White race - and if worshipping a Zuttslut is an improvement, then that's really b-ACK
>>18327519>>18327521Concidentally, Julians statue looks like Massinissa - the guy that the Alexandrian Jews canonized their messiah-prophecy around as a template for what "their own massinissa" would eventually do as well.When Jesus son of Juba II adopted by Glaphyra and raised by her loyal Judahite followers of the Hasmoneans ended up cucking the Herodians and Pharisees, they went rabid and tried to erase any notion of the Messiah mythos being based on the house of Massyle as an offshoot of Davids banished firstborn.
>>18327793It's against the rules to use the N or K word on the blue boards.
>>18327519Diocletian sucked though, price controls are as low IQ as chriscuckery.
>>18327783>Do you know what NeoplatonismYes and Christianith its Neoplatonism but with somr jewish World Building background lore. What is the difference between Paganism and Christianity then?
>>18327519There are many misconceptions about Julian that I should clear up:>Julian’s ideas weren’t new or controversial among contemporary pagans as he was a Neoplatonist, which was already the standard view amongst educated pagans in the Roman Empire. He wasn’t some “distant academic” either as he was patron of public rituals and festivals which were still popular amongst pagans.>Despite popular misconception, Julian wasn’t trying to create a new “pagan church.” What he actually was trying to do was unify the already-existing pagan religions under a core Neoplatonic framework; the rituals, priesthoods, and whatnot would remain the same as they always had been, the only difference being that they all would come to see they were different shades of the truth rather than standing on their own. None of these are new ideas either as Platonists have always held this view towards the divine and Interpretatio graeca had already been a thing since the BC era. The only thing Julian actually did borrow from Christianity was charity and support for the poor since he argued that charity was the only reason why Christianity ever became widespread.>The only thing that was weird was Julian’s insistence on animal sacrifice which had already declined long before the rise of Christianity. He was reportedly upset by the fact that active pagan cults were no longer widely practicing it and was so obsessed with animal sacrifice that even other pagans sympathetic to him made fun of this and often joked that the empire would eventually run out of cattle.I should also clarify that although Julian did try to establish a unified hierarchy to supervise local city-cults, this isn’t the same thing as establishing a new “church” since all he really did was restore patronage to the imperial cult and tried uniting other already-existing priesthoods with it (which again, would all be theologically unified under a core Neoplatonic framework).
>>18328937Neoplatonism is not compatible with Christianity lmao. Yahweh is not the Monad and cannot be the Monad as unlike Yahweh, the Monad is ineffable
