[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 174931579592996711.jpg (213 KB, 1131x1280)
213 KB
213 KB JPG
Did European/Western individualism cause a change in attitude towards immigration starting sometime in the 80s? What caused Europeans to lose their strong in-group preference that they had evidently had before?
>>
>>18328506
"Representative" democracy or in plain old English.The ruling class stopped listening to its people.
>>
lolno. Euro boomers were indoctrinated on hippie open borders ideologies/WW2 guilt and they should just let the entire Third World live there.
>>
>>18328506
Nah, mass immigration was mainly a decision made by the elite
The lower classes are the most affected by its harmful effects but the elites don’t care
>>
>>18328506
Well back in my day, letting in some immigrants from war torn countries was seen as the compassionate and moral thing to do. Letting them have a second chance to live a normal life. Basically everyone agreed with this, until we started having group rapings, religious radicals, so many non whites they completely took over towns, etc. Every liberal I knew became chuds yelling for the boats to stop.
>>
>>18328506
>that they evidently had before
in-group preference was never a limiting factor
migration used to be limited by time and distance, making it far too troublesome unless you were genuinely determined or desperate. or somebody was shipping you around for their own profit
modern technology, starting with rail, made it easy for large numbers to travel quickly and cheaply. added to that, population numbers exploded, and now we have millions of people constantly migrating in every direction
attitudes worsened over the 20th century because of this and wars, as well as easy scapegoats for gubmints screwing people over, and humanity hasn't really recovered, with many countries still making it harder rather than easier
>"non-european" births in europe
>non-european (i.e non-white)
retard
>>
>>18328506
Bullshit map
>>
File: 18771738848277.png (255 KB, 644x335)
255 KB
255 KB PNG
>>18328506
Iberian peninsula should be 100%
>>
>>18328852
lol come on dude
>>
>>18328512
Ruling class? People vote for politicans, most of whom are not aristocrats or part of the nobility lol. Europeans became much more liberal and were heavily propagandized to accept it. To think it was cool to import 3rd world brown and black people to fill the schools and jobs. It was terrible and now europeans are fucked.
>>
>>18328512
>>18328506
Immigration never existed as an issue and doesn't mean anything. Whites consume more resources and always have lower fertility, this is why immigration happens and his is a retard board.
You can focus on making humans extinct entirely instead of spamming black cock and race threads.
>>
>>18328506
>non-European
>i.e. non-white
good to know Americans and Aussies are seen as browns to Euros
>>
>>18329422
the majority of americans ARE brown
>>
Two things

1. Strong leadership hypothesis. Europeans much more likely to follow the views of a well-spoken, willful leader. See Blair.

2. Legal restrictions on speech. Britain for example had a strong antimmigration movement in the 70s (immigration was restricted then but they also wanted to remove existing immigrants and end family reunion I think), but their meetings and propaganda were basically made illegal. That's one way to neuter antimmigration sentiment
>>
>>18329422
Most "white" Americans and Australians are ethnically European
>>
>>18328506
It was never lost (except for the woke tranny left which is basically a sect of furiously anti everything european/western/christian mentals).

It just happened because the elites wanted it to happen, so you see a coalescence of interests between the woke tranny leftist mentals, and the corporate money-hungry elites at work. One day you see a few brownies in the street, next month you see a dozen of them, next a hundred of them... it all happened progressively, but it didn't matter because you were playing vidyagames and watching porn, enjoying the 90s and 00s, the fruits of neoliberalism and so on. Then you wake up but the damage's been done.

Classic left was opposed to it and saw this coming, but there is no classic left anymore.
>>
>>18328506
bullshit map is bullshit. the numbers are big and round. some ground-zero-pimple-attack snotty kid put it all together in about ten minutes.
>>
>>18328506
Communists took hold and started manipulating elections, censoring dissents, imprisoning dissents, and killing dissents.

Europe is ruled by WEF
>>
>>18329644
nah it looks pretty accurate and the sources are in there
>>
>>18328506
1. Boomers are opposed to any kind of pension reform and even suggesting that pensions should be lowered is political suicide so politicians thought that they'd avert state bankruptcy by importing niggers and browns in the false belief that they'd actually work and contribute to society.
2. Western europeans became too emphatic
>Look at these poor niggers in those shithole countries, we have a moral obligation to help them
Imo this is partly a result of the immense wealth of western europe and the lack of struggle and violence in the life of it's inhabitants
3. It became fashionable to be oikophobic. Being a bleeding heart libtard who hates his own nation and race is seen as a kind of status symbol
>>
>>18329939
>by importing niggers and browns in the false belief that they'd actually work and contribute to society
the problem with this idea is that it might have worked before welfare when they had to work or starve but welfare created the possibility of a permanent parasite class
>>
>>18329945
Not that at all. Europeans generally use Slavs for low wage grunt labor nowadays. Yet why can Slavs pick tomatoes and clean toilets while browns just live on welfare? The answer is cultural.
>>
>>18328506
/pol/tranny pulling data out of his ass
>>
>>18328852
>>
>>18328506
>What caused Europeans to lose their strong in-group preference that they had evidently had before?
Social engineering. I am from Spain, and old enough to remember there wasalmost no inmigrants in the eighties. I saw blacks, asians and hispanic-americans for the first time in the nineties. Fiest, very few numbers. Now they've stepped on the gas, and we, like hares, are watching paralyzed as the truck passes over us.
>>
>>18330147
Yeah. Spain is still a great country but immigration has issues.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.