Communist science btw
>>18354147What does Ryback have to say about him?
>>18354147He was based
>>18354150On plants, plants that learned to be commies
>>18354147Lysenko is smeared by bourgeois media because he helped lay the groundwork for epigenetics and with colleagues discovering that abiogenesis was almost certainly real which btfo’s religion >https://mltheory.wordpress.com/2024/01/23/how-life-appears-1953/>Right up until the last few years, the science of the whole world generally accepted these claims. However, they left open a certain question, namely how the first cell could’ve emerged. If a cell can only emerge from another cell and a cell nucleus from another cell nucleus, it leaves open the issue of the origin of the first cell and it can only be explained by some kind of supernatural creator.>This question was left unanswered until Soviet researcher Lepeshinskaya proved with a long series of experiments that cells can descend also from living matter without a cell structure. Lepeshinskaya’s discovery has both a tremendous theoretical and practical significance.
>>18354147He was literally right though
>>18354404>he helped lay the groundwork forHe did no such thing thoughever
>>18354147He is deeply overhated, and to a point even slandered. Don't get me wrong, he was very incorrect theoretically (in the details, I mean) and a bad scientists by all means. But he is unfairly maligned insofar as people charge him with >Causing a famine>Making genetics illegal in the USSR (when in fact mendelians retained high ranking positions in soviet biology all-throughout Lysenko's prevalence).>What he did didn't work None of which are true. And to an extent I feel is projection from western science to forget their own unspoken dogmas and taboos.>>18354404>>18354692The only thing his theories (and Michurin's) have in common with Epigenetics is that both postulate the inheritance of acquired characteristics. Everything else tends to be wrong.
>>18354147Trofim Lysenko firmly proved that the modern concept of the gene is superfluous and thus permanently destroyed eugenics. The modern conception of the gene is as such: there exist distinct single “heredity units" that all phenomenologically manifest themselves in the species possessing them. It was first advanced by Mendel. The followers of Mendel conceive that genes contain, in some kind of code script, the entire pattern of the individual’s development and of its functioning in the mature state. But Lysenko conceives of heredity and development as such:>The organism and conditions required for its life are an inseparable unity. Heredity is the property of a living body to require definite conditions for its development and to respond in a definite way to conditionsHe came to this conclusion after observing V. I. Karapetian's experiment on wheat plantations. In 1949 a search for rye grains in wheat spikes was instituted in the fields of the foothill districts where winter-wheat crops are frequently found to be adulterated with rye. What had happened is that under new conditions, the Durham wheat (28-chromosome) had started morphing into soft wheat (42-chromosome). This was impossible to explain under Darwinian presuppositions since changes in species/phenology could only happen over hundreds of generations.This was not a mere accident but rather a recurrent effect. This is also observed in modern biological research and dubbed "epigenetics". Here's a paper exploring Lysenko's original epigenetic theory and how it was pretty accurate of an explanation:>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12449684/ (Note: The authors of this study have to say negative things about Lysenkoism to appease the NATO science complex. If you read the full study you see that it supports Lysenkoism.)(1/2)
>>18355075Further advances in biology kept sweeping away the Mendelian suppositions one by one. Experiments have shown how living forms flourished as “molecular soups” long before genes existed. They self-organized, synthesized polymers (like RNA and DNA), adapted, and reproduced. They followed “instructions” arising from relations between components, according to current conditions, with no overall controller: compositional information, as the geneticist Doron Lancet calls it.In this perspective, the genes evolved way later. Physiologist Denis Noble has described it as the Dancing to the Tune of Life. It is displayed in early development. Through the statistical patterns within the storms, instructions are, again, created de novo. That could not have been specified in the fixed linear strings of DNA. Another wrench in the works has been the discovery that a "gene product" typically undergoes rearrangements before being put to use. DNA on its own does absolutely nothing until activated by the rest of the system. DNA is not a cause in an active sense.>https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2014.00625/fullIn a review in the journal Genetics in 2017, the geneticists Petter Portin and Adam Wilkins question “the utility of the concept of a basic ‘unit of inheritance’ and the belief that genes are autonomous agents.” They show that “the classic molecular definition is obsolete.” The startling implication is that the gene as popularly conceived does not really exist.This is a devastating realization for the ones wishing to build a "pure" racially structured society. There is no purity within any species. They all act within and in response to conditions. This is one of the many ways ideology creeps into science, showing once again to always hold science to the test."Ruthless Criticism of All That Exists"(2/2)
>>18355075Why do we have resident Lysenkoists and why do they post in European hours.
>>18355075epigenetics isn't about going from 28 chromosomes to 42, you are simply lying
>>183550954chan is the Ibata Khana of the internet. You will meet everyone you can think lf if you stick around long enough.
>>18355095>why do we have educated correct people posting factual knowledge
