[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1755503049589173.jpg (169 KB, 1200x854)
169 KB
169 KB JPG
Has anyone written a coherent critique of wokeness, both in it's left and right-wing manifestations yet?
>>
>>18360773
This meme should be put in a thought bubble coming from a troonjak.
>>
>>18360775
No, those people hate Israel because they think they're "white colonizers"

This is what a boomer "conservative" says when you suggest conserving something other than corporate profits and the state of Israel.
>>
>>18360773
No because woke has become a meaningless buzzword.
>>
>>18360773
Schopenhauer (pbuh) describes the very style of sophistry this nonsense is based upon:
"If you are confronted with an assertion, there is a short way of getting rid of it, or, at any rate, of throwing suspicion on it, by putting it into some odious category; even though the connection is only apparent, or else of a loose character. You can say, for instance, "That is Manichaeism" or "It is Arianism," or "Pelagianism," or "Idealism," or "Spinozism," or "Pantheism," or "Brownianism," or "Naturalism," or "Atheism," or "Rationalism," "Spiritualism," "Mysticism," and so on. In making an objection of this kind, you take it for granted (1) that the assertion in question is identical with, or is at least contained in, the category cited — that is to say, you cry out, "Oh, I have heard that before"; and (2) that the system referred to has been entirely refuted, and does not contain a word of truth.
Of any claim, do not ask if it belongs to some vague category such as "woke" but only whether it is true or false.
>>
>>18360775
Obssessed
>>
File: rw3.jpg (2.61 MB, 4500x6000)
2.61 MB
2.61 MB JPG
>>18360773
RIGHT WING BASICS
http://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1pi20Rr9_BxBbMIfcZUTTGslfZTifEiCm
google drive easy to use interface
download the whole blob or pick and choose
.
.
this collection was updated yesterdaY
>>
Why are you using black American slang to start a serious conversation about an academic subject?
>>
>>18360773
>admires national socialism
no
>blames women
no
>government redistribution is good if it's called Distributism
yes
>Everyone should think the same (all legal immigration is bad)
no, all ILLEGAL immigration is bad
>Wants state religion (Christianity)
no
>obsessed with racial identity
if acknowledging cultural and biological differences between ethnic groups makes me 'obsessed with racial identity', then yes?
>believes power matters more than truth
in a cosmic sense, power and truth are one and the same, both being derived from the all-knowing, all-powerful Supreme Being who gave birth to existence (whomever you conceptualize that to be)
>wants more government power
no
>goes after people's family members (struggle sessions)
no
>thinks the US constitution is dead
i think it's flawed and should definitely be re-evaluated, but not 'dead'
>perpetual victims
no
>collectivists
if suggesting that people should be mindful and sympathetic of others in their immediate community and not just live solely for themselves is 'collectivist', then yes?
>hates jews
depends on the jew
>>
This thread was moved to >>>/pol/529143255



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.