[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1752135068697737.jpg (42 KB, 600x599)
42 KB
42 KB JPG
Hey /his/ I have a Law question
How do you understand criminal punishments at the margin.
If the baseline penalty for breaking someone's legs is 10 years, and you reduce that penalty to 8 years do you get more knecappings? If you increase the penalty to 12 years do you get fewer knecappings? How do you know?
>>
>>18361747
>If the baseline penalty for breaking someone's legs is 10 years, and you reduce that penalty to 8 years do you get more kneecappings?
For the people that are deterred by the punishment of being locked up, maybe.

>If you increase the penalty to 12 years do you get fewer knecappings?
For the people that are deterred by the punishment of being locked up, maybe.

But there's other factors and other people, so this is the sort of thing retired practitioners write books about.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.